Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T18:53:20.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigation of ZnO:Al Doping Level and Deposition Temperature Effects on CIGS Solar Cell Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Joel N. Duenow ,
Timothy A. Gessert ,
David M. Wood ,
Brian Egaas ,
Rommel Noufi  and
Timothy J. Coutts
Joel N. Duenow
Affiliation:
joel_duenow@nrel.gov, Colorado School of Mines, Dept. of Physics, 1500 Illinois St., Golden, CO 80401, Golden, CO, 80401, United States, 303-384-6493, 303-384-7600
Timothy A. Gessert
Affiliation:
tim_gessert@nrel.gov, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO, 80401, United States
David M. Wood
Affiliation:
dmwood@mines.edu, Colorado School of Mines, Dept. of Physics, 1500 Illinois St., Golden, CO, 80401, United States
Brian Egaas
Affiliation:
brian_egaas@nrel.gov, Colorado School of Mines, Dept. of Physics, 1500 Illinois St., Golden, CO, 80401, United States
Rommel Noufi
Affiliation:
rommel_noufi@nrel.gov, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO, 80401, United States
Timothy J. Coutts
Affiliation:
tim_coutts@nrel.gov, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO, 80401, United States
Get access

Abstract

Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) photovoltaic cells require a highly conducting and transparent top electrode for optimum device performance. ZnO thin films doped with 2 wt.% Al (ZnO:Al) are commonly used to ensure sufficient conductivity while providing acceptable transparency to the active absorber layers. Deposition of transparent conducting oxide (TCO) films on CIGS cells often is performed at room temperature in the manufacturing process because of production advantages. However, material properties and reproducibility may be poorer at room temperature than at higher temperatures. Maximum mobilities of 2 wt.%-doped ZnO:Al grown at room temperature in pure Ar are typically ∼20-25 cm2V-1s-1. Relatively high carrier concentration is therefore required to achieve the desired conductivity. This high carrier concentration produces low infrared transmittance due to increased free-carrier absorption.

World-record CIGS cells produced at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) are known to tolerate photolithographic processing temperatures of ∼100°C, though significant changes in device performance occur beyond 200°C. In this study, we investigate whether ZnO:Al films with superior material properties can be produced at the elevated temperatures consistent with CIGS processing parameters. We examine undoped ZnO and ZnO:Al with doping levels of 0.5, 1, and 2 wt.% Al2O3 for growth at substrate temperatures from 25° to 360°C using radio-frequency magnetron sputtering. For films grown in a 100% Ar ambient, optimal electrical and optical properties are achieved at ∼150°-200°C. Controlled incorporation of H2 in the Ar sputtering ambient at 200°C increases mobility to 48 cm2V-1s-1 for undoped ZnO and 36 cm2V-1s-1 for 0.5 wt.%-doped ZnO:Al. Both values are considerably higher than the 25 cm2V-1s-1 of 2 wt.%-doped ZnO:Al deposited at 200°C in 100% Ar. We have explored whether these higher-mobility films can be exploited in the design of high-quality CIGS devices produced at NREL. Preliminary results show similar open-circuit voltage and only slightly lower short-circuit current compared to devices utilizing the standard 2 wt.%-doped ZnO:Al deposited at room temperature. This suggests that higher-performance devices may result once the TCO thickness is optimized for the higher mobility.

Keywords

transparent conductorsputteringphotovoltaic
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1012: Symposium Y – Thin-Film Compound Semiconductor Photovoltaics-2007 , 2007 , 1012-Y01-08
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lewis, B. G. and Paine, D. C., MRS Bulletin 25, 22–27 (2000).Google Scholar
2. Wasa, K., Hayakawa, S., and Hada, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 10, 1732 (1971).Google Scholar
3. Minami, T., Nanto, H., and Takata, S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 23, L280–L282 (1984).Google Scholar
4. Duenow, J. N., Gessert, T. A., Wood, D. M., Barnes, T. M., Young, M., To, B., and Coutts, T. J., Proceedings of the American Vacuum Society 53rd International Symposium and Exhibition, to be published in J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A 25, Nbr. 4 (2007).Google Scholar
5. Coutts, T. J., Young, D. L., and Li, X., MRS Bulletin 25, 58–65 (2000).Google Scholar
6. Gabor, A. M., Tuttle, J. R., Albin, D. S., Contreras, M. A., and Noufi, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 198–200 (1994).Google Scholar
7. Bhattacharya, R. N., Contreras, M. A., Egaas, B., and Noufi, R. N., Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 253503 (2006).Google Scholar
8. Pei, Z. L., Sun, C., Tan, M. H., Xiao, J. Q., Guan, D. H., Huang, R. F., and Wen, L. S., J. Appl. Phys. 90, 3432–3436 (2001).Google Scholar
9. Szyszka, B., Thin Solid Films 351, 164–169 (1999).Google Scholar