Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T06:52:20.400Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ion Implantation Damage and B Diffusion in Low Energy B Implantation with Ge Preimplantation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

M. Kase  and
H. Mori
M. Kase
Affiliation:
Fujitsu limited, 1015, Kamikodanaka, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, 211, Japan.
H. Mori
Affiliation:
Fujitsu limited, 1015, Kamikodanaka, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, 211, Japan.
Get access

Abstract

For low energy B (LEB) implantation into Si, the channeling tail is larger than for BF2+ implantation, so Ge+ preamorphization is expected to provide a shallower junction. We studied the Ge+ and B+ implantation damages and the damage-induced B diffusion. The substrate implanted Ge+ with 2×l014 cm-2, that is, a complete amorphization, retains less residual defects after RTA. However the sheet resistivity (S) is higher than the sample implanted with only LEB. Solid phase epitaxy (SPE) of amorphized layer causes B out-diffusion. The diffusion length of the amorphized substrate is smaller than that of LEB. We expect that the B diffusion is enhanced by the LEB damage, which corresponds to the enhanced diffusion of light damage.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 396: Symposium A – Ion-Solid Interactions for Materials Modification and Processing , 1995 , 757
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Current, M. I., Adibi, B., Wanger, D., Anjum, M., McComas, W., and Prussin, S., proceeding of Ion Implantation Technology 94, 1–43 (1994)Google Scholar
2 Bai, G. and Nicolet, M.-A., J. Appl. Phys. 70, 3551 (1991)Google Scholar
3 Kikuchi, Y., Kase, M., Kimura, M., and Yoshida, M., Nucl. Instr. Meth. B80/81, 628 (1993)Google Scholar
4 Kase, M., Kikuchi, Y., Kimura, M., Mori, H., and Ogawa, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 1335 (1991).Google Scholar
5 Kase, M., Kikuchi, Y., Kataoka, Y., and Mori, H., Nucl. Instr. Meth. B74, 75 (1993)Google Scholar
6 Griffin, P. B., Lever, R. F., Packan, P. A., and Plummer, J. D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 1242 (1994).Google Scholar
7 Zieglar, J. F., Biersack, J. P. and Haggmark, L. G., The Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids, ed. Zieglar, J. F., (Pergamon Press, New York, 1985)Google Scholar
8 Claverie, A., Laânab, L., Bonafos, C., Bergaud, C., Martinez, A., and Mathiot, D., Nucl. Instr. Meth. B96, 202 (1995)Google Scholar
9 Poate, J. M. and Williams, J. S., Amorphization and Crystallization of Semicondutors, (Ion Implantation and Beam Processing, edited by Williams, J. S. and Poate, J. M.) Academic Press, New York, 1984 Google Scholar
10 Masetti, G., Severi, M., and Solmi, S., IEEE, trans. Electron. Devices, ED-30, 764 (1983)Google Scholar