Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-smtgx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-19T22:06:48.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Matrix Modulus Affects Invasion Rate of Tumor Cells throughSynthetic Hydrogels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2012

Esmaiel Jabbari*
Affiliation:
Biomimetic Materials and Tissue Engineering Laboratory, University of South Carolina Columbia, SC 29208, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Understanding factors affecting cell invasion influences the design ofengineered constructs for tissue regeneration. The objective of this workwas to investigate the effect of matrix stiffness on invasion of tumor cellsthrough a synthetic hydrogel with well-defined properties. A novel staracrylate-functionalized polyethylene glycol-co-lactide (SPELA) macromer wassynthesized to produce hydrogels with well-defined water content, elasticmodulus, degree of crosslinking and hydrophilicity. The hydrogel was formedby photo-polymerization of the macromer with or without integrin-bindingcell adhesive RGD peptide. Cell invasion experiments were carried out in atranswell with SPELA hydrogel as the invading matrix and 4T1 mouse breastcancer cells. The invading cells on the lower membrane side were countedwith an inverted fluorescent microscope. The concentration of SPELA macromerranged from 10-25 wt% and that of RGD ranged from 1x10-4 to 1x10-2 M. The shear modulus of the hydrogel varied from 200 Pato 25 kPa as the SPELA concentration increased from 10 to 25 wt%. Cellinvasion slightly increased with increasing RGD concentration. However, RGDconcentration >1% resulted in a significant decrease in cell migration.As the matrix stiffness increased from 0.15 to 0.4, 3, 5, 6, 14, and 25 kPathe invasion rate decreased from 18.0 to 5.5, 6, 5.7, 5.2, 1.5, and 1.0 cells/mm2/h, respectively. There was a sharp decrease ininvasion rate for matrix stiffness greater than 10 kPa. Results demonstratethat matrix stiffness plays a major role in invasion of tumor cell through agelatinous matrix.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Alvarez, D., Vollmann, E.H. and von Andrian, U.H., Immunity 29, 325 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Dambly-Chaudiere, C., Cubedo, N. and Ghysen, A., BMC Dev. Biol. 7, 23 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Friedl, P. and Wolf, K., Nat. Rev. Cancer 3, 362 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Kitaori, T., Ito, H., Schwarz, E.A., Tsutsumi, R., Yoshitomi, H., Oishi, S., Nakano, M., Fujii, N., Nagasawa, T. and Nakamura, T., Arthritis Rheumatism 60, 813 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Schantz, J.T., Chim, H. and Whiteman, M., Tissue Eng. 13, 2615 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Jabbari, E. and He, X., J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 19, 311 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Moeinzadeh, S., Khorasani, S.N., Ma, J., He, X. and Jabbari, E., Polymer 52, 3887 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. He, X. and Jabbari, E., Prot. Pept. Lett. 13, 715 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar