Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T12:27:48.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanical and Electrical Properties of Nanocrystalline and Epitaxial TiN Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

H. Wang ,
A. Kvit ,
X. Zhang  and
C. C. Koch
H. Wang
Affiliation:
J. Narayan Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7916
A. Kvit
Affiliation:
J. Narayan Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7916
X. Zhang
Affiliation:
J. Narayan Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7916
C. C. Koch
Affiliation:
J. Narayan Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7916
Get access

Abstract

High-temperature materials such as TiN have been successfully applied as wear corrosion protection, decorative coatings, electrical contacts and diffusion barriers in electronic devices. However the poor toughness and ductility have limited some of these applications. To alleviate some of these problems, reduction of grain size can enhance grain boundary sliding and grain boundary diffusion related creep phenomena. We have investigated mechanical and electrical properties of TiN as a function of microstructure varying from nanocrystalline to single crystal TiN films deposited on (100) silicon substrates. By varying the substrate temperature from 25oC to 700oC during pulsed laser deposition, the microstructure of TiN films changed from nanocrystalline (having uniform grain size of 8 nm) to a single crystal epitaxial film on the silicon (100) substrate. The microstructure and epitaxial nature of these films were investigated using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). Hardness measurements were made using nanoindentation techniques. Resistivity measurements were performed by van der Pauw method. The nanocrystalline TiN contained numerous triple junctions without any presence of amorphous regions. The width of the grain boundary remained constant 1 nm as a function of boundary angle. Similarly the grain boundary structure did not change with grain size. The hardness of TiN films decreased with decreasing grain size in nanoscale. This behavior has been modeled recently involving grain boundary sliding which is particularly relevant in the case of hard materials such as TiN. The dependence of resistivity of TiN as a function of the substrate temperature is discussed and correlated with hardness results.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 697: Symposium P – Surface Engineering 2001--Fundamentals and Applications , January 2001 , P8.4
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Shenhar, A., Gotman, I., Radin, S., Ducheyne, P., and Gutmanas, E.Y., Surface and Coating Tech. 126, 210 (2000).Google Scholar
2. Musil, J., Surface and Coating Tech. 125, 341 (2000).Google Scholar
3. Roquiny, P., Mathot, G., Tewagne, G., Bodart, F., and Brande, P. van den, Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research, Section B 161–163, 600 (2000).Google Scholar
4. Vershinin, N., Filomov, K., Straumal, B., Gust, W., Wiener, I., Rabkin, E., and Kazakevich, A., Surface and Coating Technol. 125, 229 (2000).Google Scholar
5. Wittmer, M., Studer, B., and Melchiar, H., J. Appl. Phys. 52, 5722 (1981).Google Scholar
6. Narayan, J., Tiwari, P., Singh, J., Chowdhury, R., and Zheleva, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 1290 (1992); J. Narayan, U.S. Patent 5, 406,123 (April 11, 1995).Google Scholar
7. Lawn, B., Fracture of Brittle Solids, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1995), pp. 332–334.Google Scholar
8. Conrad, H. and Narayan, J., Scripta Mater. 42, 1025 (2000).Google Scholar
9. Narayan, J., J. Nanoparticle Res. 2, 91 (2000).Google Scholar
10. Koch, C.C. and Narayan, J., Structure and Mechanical Properties of Nanophase Materials-Theory and Computer Simulation vs Experiment, MRS Symp. Proc. in press, (2001).Google Scholar
11. Venkatesan, R., Sharma, A.K., Kvit, A., Wei, Q., Sankar, J. and Narayan, J., MRS Proceedings 634 (2000).Google Scholar
12. Weertman, J.R. et al. MRS Bulletin 24, 44 (1999).Google Scholar
13. Swegenhoven, H. Van and Caro, A., Phys. Rev. B 58, 11246 (1998).Google Scholar
14. Narayan, J. and Washburn, J., Phil. Mag. 26, 1179 (1972).Google Scholar
15. Wang, H., Tiwari, A., Kvit, A., Zhang, X., and Narayan, J., accepted by Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002.Google Scholar