Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-w5vf4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-03T07:56:10.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanisms for N-Type Impurity-Induced Disordering of AlGaAs/GaAs Superlattices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

B. L. Olmsted
Affiliation:
The Institute of Optics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627
S. N. Houde-Walter
Affiliation:
The Institute of Optics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627
R. Enrique Viturro
Affiliation:
Xerox Webster Research Center, 114–41D, Webster, NY 14580
Get access

Abstract

We report on a study of disordering by the in-diffusion of a variety of Group IV and Group VI n-type impurities. Secondary ion mass spectroscopy, electrochemical C-V profiling, photoluminescence spectroscopy, and cathodoluminescence spectroscopy were used to determine the extent of interdiffusion, and the spatial distribution of impurities and native defects for impurity-induced disordering. In all cases, the n-type dopants enhance the Al-Ga interdiffusion coefficient over that due to an As overpressure of 2 atm alone. The Si-induced enhancement has been previously attributed to the change in Fermi level with doping and therefore should account for disordering using other n-type impurities. However, we observe important differences in the interdiffusion characteristics (diffusion rate, dopant profiles, energy and intensity of the deep-level emission) induced by Si or Ge, and that by S or Se. Whereas a strong correlation exists between the carrier concentration profile and the disordered regions in the Si-, Ge-, and Se-doped crystals, little direct correspondence is found for crystals doped with S. Instead, the disordering seems to be determined primarily by the presence of Group III vacancies, as is also the case in undoped crystals disordered by an As ambient alone. In addition, the deep level emission at 1.15 and 1.3 eV, which are associated with vacancy defects, correlates well with the extent of the Al-Ga interdiffusion.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Olmsted, B. L., Houde-Walter, S. N., and Viturro, R. E. in Advanced III-V Compound Semiconductor Growth. Processing and Devices, edited by Pearton, S. J., Sadana, D. K., and Zavada, J. M. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 240, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992), pp. 721726.Google Scholar
2. Walukiewicz, W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 2094 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Tan, T. Y. and Gösele, U., Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 1240 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Tan, T. Y. and Gösele, U. in Advances in Materials. Processing and Devices in III-V Compound Semiconductors, edited by Sadana, D. K., Eastman, L. E., and Dupuis, R. (Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 144, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989), pp. 221232.Google Scholar
5. Viturro, R. E., Olmsted, B. L., Houde-Walter, S. N., and Wicks, G. W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 9, 2244 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Chiang, S. Y. and Pearson, G. L., J. Appl. Phys. 46, 2986 (1975).Google Scholar
7. Kahen, K. B., Peterson, D. L., Rajeswaran, G., and Lawrence, D. L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 651 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Deppe, D. G. and Holonyak, N. J., J. Appl. Phys. 64, R93 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Sze, S. M., Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1981), p. 19.Google Scholar
10. Kavanagh, K. L., Magee, C. W., Sheets, J., and Mayer, J. W., J. Appl. Phys. 64, 1845 (1988).Google Scholar
11. Yu, S., Gösele, U. M., and Tan, T. Y., J. Appl. Phys. 66, 2952 (1989).Google Scholar
12. Kahen, K. B., J. Appl. Phys. 66, 6176 (1989).Google Scholar
13. Zaharí, M. D. and Tuck, B., J. Phys. D 15, 1741 (1982).Google Scholar
14. Hurle, D. T. J., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 40, 627 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Williams, E. W., Phys. Rev. 168, 922 (1968).Google Scholar