Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:03:23.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microstructural Effects on the Shock Compression Response of Cold-Rolled Ni/Al Multilayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2013

Paul E. Specht ,
Naresh Thadhani  and
Timothy P. Weihs
Paul E. Specht
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Naresh Thadhani
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Timothy P. Weihs
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Get access

Abstract

Heterogeneities at the meso-scale strongly influence the shock compression response of composite materials. Laminated geometries with full density and intimate particle contacts provide a unique system to investigate the influence of microstructure on a propagating shock wave. Computational analysis is used to understand the effects of layer orientation and bilayer spacing on the shock compression response of cold-rolled Ni/ Al multilayers. Real, heterogeneous microstructures, obtained from optical micrographs, are incorporated into the Eulerian, finite volume code CTH. The results show a marked difference in the dissipation and dispersion of the shock wave as the underlying microstructure varies.

Keywords

shock loadingsimulationcomposite
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1521: Symposium OO – Properties, Processing and Applications of Reactive Materials , 2013 , mrsf12-1521-oo08-03
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Munir, Z., and Anselmi-Tambrini, U., Mat. Sci. Rep. 3, 277–365 (1989).10.1016/0920-2307(89)90001-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, A. et al. ., J. Appl. Phys., 82, 1178–1188 (1997).10.1063/1.365886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xun, Y. et al. ., U.S. Patent Application No. 20110027547 (2011).Google Scholar
Sandia National Laboratories, CTH v8.1, v9.1, and v10.2, (2007-2011).Google Scholar
Specht, P. et al. ., J. Appl. Phys., 111, 073527 (2012).10.1063/1.3702867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, D. et al. ., J. Appl. Phys. 51, 1498–1504 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oved, Y. et al. ., J. Composite Materials, 12, 84–96 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhuang, S. et al. ., J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 51, 245–265 (2003).10.1016/S0022-5096(02)00100-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar