Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T04:10:44.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructural Modeling of Electrical Behavior in CNT Polymer Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2012

S. Xu
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
O. Rezvanian
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
K. Peters
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
M.A. Zikry
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
Get access

Abstract

A three-dimensional (3D) carbon nanotube (CNT) resistor network computational model was developed to investigate the electrical conductivity, and current and thermal flow in polymer composites with randomly dispersed CNTs. A search algorithm was developed to determine conductive paths for 3D CNT arrangements and to account for electron tunneling effects. By coupling Maxwell specialized finite-element (FE) formulation with Fermi-based tunneling resistance, specialized FE techniques were then used to obtain current density evolution for different CNT/polymer dispersions and tunneling distances. These computational approaches address the limitations of percolation theories that are used to estimate electrical conductivity of CNTs. The predictions indicate that tunneling distance significantly affects 3D electrical conductivity and thermal distributions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hu, N., Masuda, Z., Yan, C., Yamamoto, G., Fukunaga, H., and Hashida, T., Nanotechnology, 215701-10, 19 (2008).Google Scholar
2. Nan, C. –W., Shen, Y., and Ma, J., Annual Review of Material Research, 131-51, 40 (2010).Google Scholar
3. Qian, H., Greenhalgh, E. S., Shaffer, M. S. P., and Bismark, A., Journal of Materials Chemistry, 4751-62, 20 (2010).Google Scholar
4. Stauffer, D. and Aharony, A., Introduction to Percolation theory (Taylor & Francis, London, 1994).Google Scholar
5. Balberg, I., Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 42 (2009).Google Scholar
6. Mclachlan, D. S., Chiteme, C., Park, C., and Wise, K. E., Journal of Polymer Science B, 3273-87, 43 (2005).Google Scholar
7. Kovacs, J. Z., Velagala, B. S., Schulte, K., Bauhofer, W., Composite Science and Technology, 922-8, 67 (2007).Google Scholar
8. Ambrosetti, G., Grimaldi, C., Balberg, I., Maeder, T., Danani, A., and Ryser, P., Physical Review B, 155434-45, 81 (2010).Google Scholar
9. Dalmas, F., Dendievel, R., Chazeau, L., Cavaille, J-Y, and Gauthier, C., Acta Materialia, 2923-31, 54 (2006).Google Scholar
10. Liu, Y. J., Chen, X. L., Mechanics of Materials, 69-81, 35 (2003).Google Scholar
11. Tserpes, K. I., Papanikos, P., Labeas, G., and Pantelakis, S. G., Theoretical and applied fracture mechanics, 51-60, 49 (2008).Google Scholar
12. Ashrafi, B., Hubert, P., Composites Science and Technology, 387-96, 66 (2006).Google Scholar
13. Hu, N., Karube, Y., Arai, M., Watanabe, T., Yan, C., Li, Y., Liu, Y., and Fukunaga, H., Carbon, 680-7, 48 (2010).Google Scholar
14. Li, C., Thostenson, E. T., and Chou, T-W., Applied Physics Letters, 223114-6, 91 (2007).Google Scholar
15. Simmons, J. G., Journal of Applied Physics, 1793-803, 34 (1963).Google Scholar