Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:27:33.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructure and Deformation of Ti-22Al-23Nb Orthorhombic-Based Monolithic and Composite Titanium Aluminides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

François-charles dary
Affiliation:
Current address: Materials Dept., University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Shiela R. Woodard
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Dept., Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Tresa M. Pollock
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Dept., Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Get access

Abstract

A new class of intermetallic matrix composites (IMC's) based on orthorhombic titanium aluminides offer attractive properties for high-temperature structural components at temperatures up to 760°C. Results from an ongoing study on the microstructural stability and mechanical properties of the orthorhombic-based alloy Ti-22Al–23Nb (at%), in both monolithic and composite forms, are discussed. Oxygen acquired during processing or as a result of high-temperature exposure in air or vacuum has a pronounced influence on the microstructure of the monolithic and composite materials. Two-phase lath microstructures of ordered beta (βo) + orthorhombic (O) phases produced by processing low oxygen material above the beta transus are morphologically stable at 760°C. Conversely, in higher-oxygen three-phase microstructures containing O+βo+ α2(Ti3Al), lath coarsening and additional precipitation of α2 in oxygen-enriched sheet surface regions is observed. At 760°C/69MPa the two-phase lath microstructure has a higher creep resistance and lower tensile strength compared to the three-phase α2- containing microstructures of the higher oxygen material.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Banerjee, D., Gogia, A.K., Nandi, T.K. and Joshi, V.A., Acta Metall. 36, (1988), pp. 871882.Google Scholar
2. Rowe, R.G., in Microstructure/Property Relationships in Titanium Aluminides and Alloys, Y.K., Kim and R.R., Boyer, eds., TMS, Warrendale, PA, (1991), pp. 387398.Google Scholar
3. Nandy, T.K., Mishra, R.S. and Banerjee, D., Scripta Metall. Mater. 28, (1993), 569574.Google Scholar
4. Rhodes, C.G., Graves, J.A., Smith, P.R. and James, M.R., in Structural Intermetallics, R., Darolia et al. , eds., TMS, Warrendale, PA, (1993), pp. 4552.Google Scholar
5. Graves, J.A., Smith, P.R. and Rhodes, C.G. in Intermetallic Matrix Composites II, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 273, D.B., Miracle et al. , eds., MRS, Pittsburgh, PA, (1992), pp 31–42.Google Scholar
6. Graves, J.A., Smith, P.R. and Rhodes, C.G. in Intermetallic Matrix Composites II, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol.273, D.B., Miracle et al. , eds., MRS, Pittsburgh, PA, (1992), pp 4352.Google Scholar
7. Smith, P.R., Khobaib, M. and Graves, J.A., Scripta Metall. Mater. 29, (1993), pp 13131318.Google Scholar