Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:23:56.260Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morphological Stability of Ni(Al)/Ni3Al Nanolaminate Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Jason P. Fain
Affiliation:
Dept. MSE, The Ohio State University, 2041 College Rd., Columbus, H 43210-1179
Rajarshi Banerjee
Affiliation:
Dept. MSE, The Ohio State University, 2041 College Rd., Columbus, H 43210-1179
Daniel Josell
Affiliation:
Materials B 164 NIST 100 Bureau Dr, Stop 8554 Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8554.
Peter M. Anderson
Affiliation:
Dept. MSE, The Ohio State University, 2041 College Rd., Columbus, H 43210-1179, anderson.1@osu.edu.
Hamish Fraser
Affiliation:
Dept. MSE, The Ohio State University, 2041 College Rd., Columbus, H 43210-1179
Natalia Tymiak
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemical Eng. and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. MN.
William Gerberich
Affiliation:
Dept. MSE, The Ohio State University, 2041 College Rd., Columbus, H 43210-1179
Get access

Abstract

This manuscript discusses the morphological instability observed when multilayered samples with alternating layers of Γ-Ni(Al)/γ-Ni3Al are exposed to 800C for approximately 100 hours. Samples with 20nm/20nm or 120nm/120nm layer thickness and <001> or <Ill> crystal orientation to the interface normal were tested. Pinching off of layers is strongly affected by crystal orientation and layer thickness. Corresponding modeling suggests that the stability of this system is sensitive to fluctuations in the volume fraction of the two phases, the aspect ratio of columnar grains in the layers, and whether coherent or semi-coherent interfaces are present.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Clemens, B.M., King, H., Barnett, S.A., MRS Bulletin 24(2), p. 20 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Anderson, P.M., Foecke, T., and Hazzledine, P.M., MRS Bulletin 24(2), p. 27 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Nathal, M.V., MacKay, R.A., and Miner, R.V., Metall. Trans. A 20A, p. 133 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Paris, O., Fahrmann, M., Fahrmann, E., Pollock, T.M., and Fratzl, P., Acta Mater. 45(3), p. 1085 (1997).Google Scholar
5. MacKay, R.A. and Ebert, L.J., Metall. Trans. A 16A, p. 1969 (1985).Google Scholar
6. Caron, P., Henderson, P.J., Khan, T., and McLean, M., Scripta Metall. 20, p. 875 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Josell, D., Coriell, S.R., and McFadden, G.B., Acta Metall. Mater. 43(5), p. 1987 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Josell, D. and Spaepen, F., MRS Bulletin 24(2), p. 39 (1999).Google Scholar
9. Sridhar, N.J., Rickman, J.M., and Srolovitz, D.J., Acta Mater. 45(7), 2715 (1997).Google Scholar
10. Ardell, A., personal communication with JPF (1998).Google Scholar
11. Murr, L.E., Interfacial Phenomena in Metals and Alloys, Addison-Wesley, NY (1975).Google Scholar
12. Chen, S.P, Srolovitz, D.J., and Voter, A.F., J. Mater. Res. 4(1), p. 62 (1989).Google Scholar
13. Marsh, C. and Chen, H., Acta Metall. Mater. 38(11), p. 2287 (1990).Google Scholar
14. Mishin, Y., Orekhov, N., Razumovskii, I., Alyoshin, G., and Noat, P., Mater. Sci. Eng. A171, p. 163 (1993).Google Scholar
15. Gada, J. and MacKay, R.A., Scripta Metall. 23, p. 1835 (1989).Google Scholar