Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-k7rjm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-04T07:53:14.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Characterization of a Polymerized Ionic Liquid Electrolyte Material

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2012

A.L. Michan ,
G.T.M. Nguyen ,
O. Fichet ,
F. Vidal ,
C. Vancaeyzeele  and
C.A. Michal
A.L. Michan
Affiliation:
Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
G.T.M. Nguyen
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Physicochimie des Polymères et des Interfaces (LPPI), Institut des Matériaux, University of Cergy-Pontoise, France.
O. Fichet
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Physicochimie des Polymères et des Interfaces (LPPI), Institut des Matériaux, University of Cergy-Pontoise, France.
F. Vidal
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Physicochimie des Polymères et des Interfaces (LPPI), Institut des Matériaux, University of Cergy-Pontoise, France.
C. Vancaeyzeele
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Physicochimie des Polymères et des Interfaces (LPPI), Institut des Matériaux, University of Cergy-Pontoise, France.
C.A. Michal
Affiliation:
Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Get access

Abstract

Solid electrolyte materials have the potential to improve performance and safety characteristics of lithium-ion batteries by replacing conventional solvent-based electrolytes. A candidate solid polymer electrolyte, AMLi/PEGDM, has been synthesized by crosslinking an anionic monomer AMLi, with poly(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate. The main goal of the synthesis is to produce a single-ion conducting polymer network where lithium cations can move freely and fluorinated anions are immobilized as part of the polymer network. A comprehensive characterization of anion and cation mobility in the resulting material is therefore required. Using pulsed-field gradient nuclear magnetic resonance (PFG-NMR), we are able to measure and quantify the individual diffusion coefficients of mobile species in the material (19 F and 7 Li) and confirm the extent to which the fluorinated anionic component is immobilized. We have characterized dry (σ~3.0 x10-7 S/cm at 30°C) and propylene carbonate (PC) saturated gel (σ~1.0x10-4 S/cm at 30°C) samples. Experimental results include NMR spin-spin and spin-lattice relaxation times in addition to diffusion coefficient measurements over a temperature range up to 100°C. Practically, the diffusion measurements are extremely challenging, as the spin-spin (T2) relaxation times are very short, necessitating the development of specialized pulsed-field gradient apparatus. Diffusion coefficients for the most mobile components of the lithium cations and fluorinated anions at 100°C in dry membranes have been found to be 3.4 x10-8 cm2/s and 2.1 x10-8 cm2/s respectively. These results provide valuable insight into the conduction mechanisms in these materials, and will drive further optimization of solid polymer electrolytes.

Keywords

polymerdiffusionnuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)

Information

Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1440: Symposium O – Next-Generation Energy Storage Materials and Systems , 2012 , mrss12-1440-o09-02
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Mazor, H., Golodnitsky, D., Peled, E., Wieczorek, W. and Scrosati, B., J. of Power Sources 178, 736–743 (2008).Google Scholar
2. Juger, J., Meyer, F., Vidal, F., Chevrot, C., Teyssie, D., Tetrahedron Letters 50, 128–131 (2009).Google Scholar
3. Tanner, J.E., J. of Chemical Physics, 52, 5, 2523-2526 (1970).Google Scholar
4. Conradi, M.S., Garroway, A.N., Cory, D.H., and Miller, J.R., J. Magn. Reson. 94 370–375 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Zhang, W. and Cory, D.G., J. of Magnetic Resonance 132, 144–149 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Michal, C. A. and Broughton, K. and Hansen, E., Review of Scientific Instruments 73, 453–458 (2002).Google Scholar
7. Mattiello, J., Basser, P.J. and LeBihan, D., J. Mag Reson. Series A 108, 131–141 (1994).Google Scholar
8. Armand, M.B., Bruce, P.G., Forsyth, M., Scrosati, B. and Wieczorek, W. in Energy Materials edited by Bruce, D.W., O’Hare, D. and Walton, R.I. (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, West Sussex, 2011) pp 15.Google Scholar
9. Chauvin, C., Alloin, F., Judeinstein, P., Foscallo, D., and Sanchez, J.-Y., Electrochimica Acta 52, 1240–1246 (2006).Google Scholar