Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T16:12:29.667Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Orientation Effects on the Heteroepitaxial Growth of CdxHg1−xTe on to CdTe and GaAs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

J Giess ,
J S Gough ,
S J C Irvine ,
J B Mullin  and
G W Blackmore
J Giess
Affiliation:
Royal Signals and Radar Establishment, St Andrews Road, Great Malvern, Worcs WR14 3PS, UK
J S Gough
Affiliation:
Royal Signals and Radar Establishment, St Andrews Road, Great Malvern, Worcs WR14 3PS, UK
S J C Irvine
Affiliation:
Royal Signals and Radar Establishment, St Andrews Road, Great Malvern, Worcs WR14 3PS, UK
J B Mullin
Affiliation:
Royal Signals and Radar Establishment, St Andrews Road, Great Malvern, Worcs WR14 3PS, UK
G W Blackmore
Affiliation:
Royal Signals and Radar Establishment, St Andrews Road, Great Malvern, Worcs WR14 3PS, UK
Get access

Abstract

For MOVPE growth of CdTe on to (100) GaAs the orientation of the epitaxial layer is dependent on a combination of the growth conditions and substrate treatment prior to growth, (100) being the preferred orientation. (111) oriented CdTe layers can be grown on to (111) GaAs substrates. The effect of orientation on the choice of buffer composition, electrical properties and the extent of Ga diffusion from the substrate is discussed. Epitaxial CMT layers grown on to suitably buffered GaAs substrates are compared to similar layers grown on to CdTe substrates.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 90: Symposium R – Materials for Infrared Detectors and Sources , 1986 , 389
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Irvine, S J C and Mullin, J B, J Crystal Growth 55, 107 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Mullin, J B, Irvine, S J C and Ashen, D J J Crystal Growth 55, 92 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Tunnicliffe, J Irvine, S J C, Dosser, O D and Mullin, J B, J Crystal Growth 68, 245 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Bevan, M J and Woodhouse, K T, J Crystal Growth 68, 254 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Hoke, W E and Traczewski, R, J Appl Phys 54, 5087(1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Giess, J, Gough, J S, Irvine, S J C BTackmore, G W Mullin, J B and Royle, A, J Crystal Growth 72, 120 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Hoke, W E, Lemonias, P J and Traczewski, R, Appl Phys Lett 44, 1046 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Ghandhi, S K, Bhat, I B and Tasker, N R, J Appl Phys 59, 2253 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Cole, H S, Woodbury, H H and Schetzina, J F, J Appl Phys 55, 3166 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Hoke, W E, Traczewski, R, Kreismanis, V G, Korenstein, R and Lemonias, P J, Appl Phys Lett 47, 276 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Thompson, J, Woodhouse, K T and Dineen, C, J Crystal Growth, in press.Google Scholar
12 Feldman, R D, Austin, R F, Kisker, D W, Jeffers, K S and Bridenbaugh, P M, Appl Phys Lett 48, 248 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Lu, P Y, WiITiams, L M, Chu, S N G, J Vac Sci Technol A4, 2137 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Anderson, P L, J Vac Sci Technol A4, 2162 (1986). -CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 Fewster, P F and Whiffin, P A C, J-Appl Phys 54, 4668 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Giess, J, Barnett, S J, Brown, G T, Rodway, D C and Irvine, S J C, to be published.Google Scholar
17 Hails, J E, Russell, G J, Brinkman, A W and Woods, J, J Crystal Growth, in press.Google Scholar