Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:38:59.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Orientation of Aromatic Ion Exchange Diamines and the Effect on Melt Viscosity and Thermal Stability of PMR-15/ Silicate Nanocomposites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Sandi Campbell
Affiliation:
NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, 44135
Daniel Scheiman
Affiliation:
NASA contract via QSS
Get access

Abstract

Nanocomposites of PMR-15 polyimide and a diamine modified silicate were prepared by addition of the silicate to the PMR-15 resin. The orientation of the ion exchange diamine within the silicate gallery was determined by x-ray diffraction and found to depend on the clay cation exchange capacity. The oligomer melt viscosity exhibited a dependence on the orientation of the diamine in the silicate interlayer, and in some cases, on the length of the diamine. A correlation was observed between the oligomer melt viscosity and the crosslinking enthalpy, where nanocomposites with an increased melt viscosity exhibited a decrease in enthalpy on crosslinking. After crosslinking, those nanocomposites with a high melt viscosity had poorer thermal oxidative stability compared to the less viscous systems. The melt viscosity was tailored by co-exchange of an aromatic diamine and an aliphatic amine into the silicate. Nanocomposites prepared with this silicate exhibited an increase in thermal oxidative stability compared to the neat resin.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Meador, M.A., Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 28, 599 (1998).Google Scholar
2. Delvigs, P., Klopotek, D.L., Cavano, P.J., High Perform. Polym. 6, 209 (1994).Google Scholar
3. Alston, W., High Perform. Polym. 7 (1), 93 (1995).Google Scholar
4. Meador, M.A.B., Johnston, J.C., Frimer, A., Gilinsky-Sharon, P., Gottlieb, H., Chem. Mater. ASAP Article, (2001).Google Scholar
5. Tyan, H.L., Liu, Y.C., Wei, K.H., Chem. Mater. 11, 1942 (1999).Google Scholar
6. Lan, T., Pinnavaia, T., Chem. Mater. 6, 573 (1994).Google Scholar
7. Burnside, S., Giannelis, E.P., E.P. Chem. Mater. 9 (7), 1597 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Tyan, H.L., Liu, Y.C., Wei, K.H., Chem. Mater. 11 (7), 1942 (1999).Google Scholar
9. Lan, T., Kaviratna, D., Pinnavaia, T., Chem. Mater. 7, 2144 (1995).Google Scholar
10. Serafini, T., Delvigs, P., Lightsey, G., J. Appl. Poly. Sci. 16, 905 (1972).Google Scholar
11. Shi, H., Lan, T., Pinnavaia, T.J., Chem. Mater. 8, 1584 (1996).Google Scholar
12. Gariepy, C., PhD. Thesis, University of Akron, 2000.Google Scholar
13. Lan, T., Kaviratna, D., Pinnavaia, T., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 6–8, 1005 (1996).Google Scholar
14. Vaia, R., Teukolsky, R., Giannelis, E.P., Chem. Mater. 6, 1017 (1994).Google Scholar
15. Usuki, A., Kawasumi, M., Kojima, Y., Okada, A., Kurauchi, T., Kamigaito, O., J. Mater. Res. 8 (5), 1174 (1995).Google Scholar