Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T15:46:28.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Overview: High Speed Dynamics and Modelling as It Applies to Energetic Solids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

J. Covino ,
S. A. Finnegan ,
O. E. R Heimdahl ,
A. J. Lindfors  and
J. K. Pringle
J. Covino
Affiliation:
Research Department, Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, China Lake, CA 93555-6001
S. A. Finnegan
Affiliation:
Research Department, Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, China Lake, CA 93555-6001
O. E. R Heimdahl
Affiliation:
Research Department, Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, China Lake, CA 93555-6001
A. J. Lindfors
Affiliation:
Research Department, Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, China Lake, CA 93555-6001
J. K. Pringle
Affiliation:
Research Department, Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, China Lake, CA 93555-6001
Get access

Abstract

This paper discusses experimental techniques and modelling tools used to characterize energetic solids subjected to dynamic deformation and shock. Critical experiments have been designed to study shock response and impact sensitivity of energetic materials. For example, a simplified two dimensional experiment has been developed to study the critical phenomena involved in delayed detonation reactions (XDT). In addition, wedge tests are used to obtain equation-of-state data. Coupled with hydrocodes, these experiments give us an in-depth understanding of the response of energetic materials subjected to shock loading. A coupled methodology using both experimental and modelling tools is presented. Consisting of three parts, it addresses all possible responses to fragment impact. The three parts are: (1) Fragment impact modelling (hydrocodes and empirically based codes); (2) Experiments to obtain accurate data for predicting prompt detonation; and (3) Tests with planar rocket motor models to explore mechanisms related to bum reaction thresholds and degree of violence. This methodology is currently being used in weapon design and munitions hazard assessments.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 296: Symposium Y – Structure and Properties of Energetic Materials , 1992 , 173
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lundstrom, E. A., Proc. 1989 JANNAF Propulsion Systems Hazards Subcommittee Meeting, CPIA Publication 477, Vol.1, pp. 101–110, (February 1989).Google Scholar
2. Naval Weapons Center. Evaluation of Forest Fire Burn Model of Reaction Kinetics of Heterogeneous Explosives, by Lundstrom, E. A.. China Lake, CA, May 1988. (NWC TP 6898).Google Scholar
3. Joint Technical Coordinating Group for Munitions Effectiveness. Penetration Equations Handbook or Kinetic Energy Penetrators. Tinker AFB, Okla., JTCG, 1977, (61 JTCG/ME-77-16).Google Scholar
4. FATEPEN-2: Compact Fragment Penetration Model, VOLUMES I and II, Yatteau, J.D., Zernov, R.H. and Recht, R.F., (publication in process).Google Scholar
5. Selected Hugoniots, prepared by Group GMX-6, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Report LA-4167-MS, Los Alamos, NM (May 1969).Google Scholar
6. Stinecipher, M. M., Seventh Symposium (International) on Detonation, Annapolis, Maryland, pp. 801–810. NSWC MP 82–334, June 16–19 (1981).Google Scholar
7. Finnegan, S. A., Pringle, J. K., Schulz, J. C., and Alexander, M. D., Proc. 1990 JANNAF Propulsion Systems Hazards Subcommittee Meeting, CPIA Pub. 538, pp. 13–24 (April 1990).Google Scholar
8. Finnegan, S. A., Schulz, J. C., Pringle, J. K., and Lindfors, A. J., Proc. 1991 JANNAF Propulsion Systems Hazards Subcommittee Meeting, CPIA Pub. 562, pp. 399–408 (March 1991).Google Scholar
9. Finnegan, S. A., Pringle, J. K., Heimdahl, O. E. R., and Schulz, J. C., Proc. 1992 JANNAF Propulsion Systems Hazards Subcommittee Meeting, CPIA Pub. 582, pp. 267–283 (April 1992).Google Scholar
10. Swift, H. F., Preonis, D. D. and Turpin, W. C., Rev. Sci. Instr. 41, 746 (1970).Google Scholar