Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T22:08:39.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Physical Modeling of Defects, Dopant Activation and Diffusion in Aggressively Scaled Bulk and SOI Devices: Atomistic and Continuum Approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Victor Moroz
Affiliation:
victorm@synopsys.com, Synopsys, ., 700 East Middlefield Road, Mountain View, CA, 94043, United States, 650 584 5458
Ignacio Martin-Bragado
Affiliation:
nacho@synopsys.com, Synopsys, 700 East Middlefield Road, Mountain View, CA, 94043, United States
Get access

Abstract

In this overview we examine how advanced continuum and atomistic modeling can help to understand and resolve process and device design issues for the 65 nm technology generation and beyond. The following implantation-related issues are reviewed: wafer temperature for different types of implant equipment and its impact on defect formation and amorphization, ion scattering off the photoresist mask and its impact on threshold voltage variation, dual rotation halo implant instead of the conventional quad rotation halo implant, and engineering of the source/drain junction overlap for diffusionless annealing by using tilted implants. The following annealing-related issues are also considered: limitations of spike anneal; benefits of cocktail junctions, heat transfer mechanisms for spike and millisecond annealing, and implant damage evolution for different thermal budgets. Taken together, implant, annealing, and layout conditions are shown to explain observed threshold voltage and transistor performance variations. In addition, the effects of transistor geometry on dopant diffusion, activation, and defect formation are shown for several generations of bulk and FDSOI MOSFETs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Paul, S., Lerch, W., Hebras, X., Cherkashin, N., and Cristiano, F., “Activation, diffusion, and defect analysis of a spike anneal thermal cycle,” MRS Proceedings, 2004.Google Scholar
2 Graoui, H., Hilkene, M., McComb, B., Castle, M., Felch, S., Cowern, N.E.B., Al-Bayati, A., Tjandra, A., and Foad, M. A., MRS Proceedings, v. 810, p. 247, 2004.Google Scholar
3 Moroz, V., Foad, M., Graoui, H., Nouri, F., Pramanik, D., and Felch, S., “Ultra-shallow junctions for the 65nm node based on defect and stress engineering,” MRS Proceedings, 2005.Google Scholar
4 Poate, J. M., Eaglesham, D. J., Gilmer, G. H., Gossmann, H.-J., Jaraiz, M., Rafferty, C. S., Stolk, P. A., “Ion implantation and transient enhanced diffusion,” IEDM Tech. Dig., pp. 7780, 1995.Google Scholar
5 Sentaurus Process kMC User's Guide, Synopsys, 2006.Google Scholar