Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Physics and Applications of DIP Coating and Spin Coating

  • L. E. Scriven (a1)

Dip coating is a simple old way of depositing onto a substrate, especially small slabs and cylinders, a uniform thin film of liquid for solidification into a coating. The basic flow is steady, and in it film thickness is set by the competition among viscous force, capillary (surface tension) force and gravity. Thickness and uniformity can be sensitive to flow conditions in the liquid bath and gas overhead. The faster the substrate is withdrawn, the thicker the film deposited. This can be countered by using volatile solutes and combining rapid enough drying with the basic liquid flow. Then the physics grows more complicated, theoretical prediction of process performance more difficult, and control of the process more demanding. Outside product R&D labs it is far less often used in precision coating manufacture than a variety of premetered coating methods.

Spin coating is a more recently developed way of getting onto piecemeal substrates, especially small flat disks, a uniform thin liquid film for the same end. The basic flow is unsteady radial drainage in which centrifugal and viscous forces so compete that ordinary (Newtonian) liquid of constant viscosity tends toward a uniform film that grows ever thinner ever more slowly. Volatile solvents are commonly used because conditions can often be found that adequately separate thinning by spin-off from later thinning and solidification by drying. Thickness and uniformity, today theoretically predictable, are sensitive to speed, gas conditions, and rheology of concentrating, solidifying liquid. For the rheology of photoresist coating in microelectronics, spin coating works well. For that of suspension coatings in magnetic disk technology the process demands more careful control; actually it is often modified.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

2. R. P. Spiers , C. V. Subbaraman and W. L. Wilkinson , Chem. Eng. Sci., 29, 389396 (1974).

4. R. P. Spiers , C. V. Subbaraman and W. L. Wilkinson , Chem. Eng. Sci., 30, 379395 (1975).

6. S. F. Kistler and L. E. Scriven , Internati. J. Num. Meth. Fluids, 4, 207229 (1984).

7. P. Tanguy , M. Fortin and L. Choplin , Internati. J. Num. Meth. Fluids, 4, 441457 (1984).

9. G. F. Teletzke , H. T. Davis and L. E. Scriven , Revue Phys. Appl., 23, xxx-yyy (1988).

14. P. Groenveld , Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J., 17, 489490 (1971).

15. B. G. Higgins and L. E. Scriven , Chem. Eng. Sci., 35, 673682 (1980).

17. B. G. Higgins , Phys. Fluids, 29, 35223529 (1986).

18. S. Middleman , J. Appl. Phys., 62, 25302532 (1987).

19. D. Meyerhofer , J. Appl. Phys., 49, 39933997 (1978).

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL)
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 1946-4274
  • URL: /core/journals/mrs-online-proceedings-library-archive
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 102 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2020 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 1st May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.