Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:05:49.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Potential of High-Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy for Imaging Impurities at Dislocations and Grain Boundaries in Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Jamie H. Rose
Affiliation:
Materials and Molecular Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720
R. Gronsky
Affiliation:
Materials and Molecular Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720
Get access

Abstract

The application of HRTEM to the study of equilibrium segregation in linear and planar silicon defects is evaluated with image calculations. For this purpose, models for interstitial segregation in the Σ=9 grain boundary and donor segregation in the 30° partial dislocation are proposed. These models possess columns of impurity atoms.

Systematic image simulations were first examined for an impurity column in an otherwise perfect <110> silicon crystal. Optimum contrast and exposure times require samples of thickness equal to the transmitted beam extinction distance. Arsenic and boron are detectable with a column concentration of about 5%. With diffuse phase contrast imaging, this limit is roughly halved.

The above imaging conditions may be used to distinguish different defect core models.

Observation of segregated impurities requires somewhat higher concentrations in addition to image comparisons with a clean defect. Quantitative analysis necessitates careful image simulation comparisons and improvements in knowledge of microscope parameters.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Hashimoto, H., Endoh, H., Takai, Y., Tomioka, H., and Yodota, Y., Chem. Scrip. 14, 23 (1978).Google Scholar
(2) Yamashita, T., Ponce, F. A., Pirouz, P., and Sinclair, R., Phil. Mag. A 45, 693 (1982).Google Scholar
(3) Zakharov, N. D., Pasemann, M., and Rozhanski, V. N., Phys. Stat. Sol. 71, 275 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4) Endoh, Hisamitsu, Hashimoto, Hatsujiro, and Takai, Yoshizo, Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 24, 307 (1983).Google Scholar
(5) Glaisher, R. W. and Spargo, A. E. C., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. No. 68, 185 (1983).Google Scholar
(6) Bursill, L. A. and Jun, Shen Guang, Optik, 66, 251 (1984).Google Scholar
(7) Oueldennaoua, A., Michel, J. P., and George, A., Inst. Phys Conf. Ser. No. 67, 33 (1983).Google Scholar
(8) d'Anterroches, C. and Bourret, A., Phil. Mag., 49, 783 (1984).Google Scholar
(9) Olsen, A. and Spence, J. C. H., Phil. Mag., 43, 945 (1981).Google Scholar
(10) Hirth, John Price and Lothe, Jens, Theory of Dislocations, 2nd ed. (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1982), p. 376.Google Scholar
(11) Mandurah, M. M., Saraswat, K. C., Helms, C. R., and Kamins, T. I., J. Appl. Phys. 51, 5755 (1980).Google Scholar
(12) Mott, N. F., Phil. Mag. 19, 835 (1969).Google Scholar
(13) Rose, Jamie H., Ph.D. Thesis, University of California-Berkeley, 1985.Google Scholar
(14) O'Keefe, M. A. and Buseck, P. R., Trans. A. C. A. 15, 27 (1979).Google Scholar
(15) Cowley, J. M., Diffraction Physics, (North-Holland, Amsterdam,, 1975).Google Scholar
(16) Spence, J. C. H., in Electron Microscopy and Analysis, edited by Venables, J. A. (Academic Press, New York, 1975).Google Scholar