Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T14:04:52.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Power-Law Phenomena in Adhesive De-Bonding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

G. Kendall
Affiliation:
Environmental and Energy Engineering Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, 12180
P. J. Cote
Affiliation:
Benet Laboratories, Watervliet, NY, 12189
D. Crayon
Affiliation:
Benet Laboratories, Watervliet, NY, 12189
F. J. Bonetto
Affiliation:
Environmental and Energy Engineering Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, 12180
Get access

Abstract

Acoustic emission (AE) events were recorded during the peeling of pressure-sensitive adhesive (PSA) tape from a silicate glass surface. The distributions of AE event durations and energies are found to have the form of power laws. Power-law dependencies (hyperbolic distributions) are recognized as a consequence of self-organized criticality (SOC), resulting from the absence of any characteristic length or time scales. In these studies, standard optical microscopy was used to characterize the fractal nature of the PSA-glass interface. The present results suggest that it is the inherent static structural features found at the fractal PSA-glass interface which produce the observed hyperbolic distributions in AE events, rather than a true SOC process.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Lee, S., Jensen, L. C., Langford, S. C., and Dickinson, J. T., J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 9, 1 (1995)Google Scholar
2. Mandelbrot, B. B., The Fractal Geometry of Nature (Freeman, New York, 1983).Google Scholar
3. Wesnoushy, S. G., Sholz, C. H., Shimazaki, K., and Matsuda, T., J. Geophys. Res. 88, 9331 (1983).Google Scholar
4. Scudiero, L., Dickinson, J. T., Jensen, L. C. and Langford, S. C., J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 9, 27 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Bak, P., Tang, C., and Weisenfeld, K., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 381 (1987); Phys Rev. A 38, 36 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Johnson, A. C. and Nava, S. J., Geophys. Res. 90, 6763 (1985).Google Scholar