Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-kg7gq Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-11-04T10:19:30.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preparation and Properties of Transparent Conductors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Roy G. Gordon
Roy G. Gordon*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Get access

Abstract

Transparent, electrically conductive films have been prepared from several different metal oxides, including those of tin, indium and zinc. Deposition methods for these materials are reviewed, and their properties summarized and compared. A figure of merit for a transparent conductor may be defined as the ratio of the electrical conductivity to the optical absorption coefficient of the film. The figure of merit for fluorine-doped zinc oxide is shown to be larger than that of other transparent conductors, such as boron-doped zinc oxide, fluorine-doped tin oxide, and tin-doped indium oxide. Physical, chemical and thermal durability, deposition temperature, and cost are other factors which may also influence the choice of material for a particular application.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 426: Symposium J – Thin Films for Photovoltaic and Related Device , 1996 , 419
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Mochel, J. M., U.S. Patent No. 2, 564, 706 (7 April 1947).Google Scholar
2. McMaster, H. A., U.S. Patent No. 2, 429, 420 (21 October 1947).Google Scholar
3. Lytle, W. O. and Junge, A. E., U.S. Patent 2, 566, 346 (4 September 1951).Google Scholar
4. Mochel, J. M., U.S. Patent 2, 564, 707 (21 August 1951).Google Scholar
5. Holland, L. and Siddall, G., Vacuum III (1953).Google Scholar
6. Dates, H. F. and Davis, J. K., U.S. Patent No. 3, 331, 702 (18 July 1967).Google Scholar
7. Gordon, R. G., U.S. Patent No. 4, 146, 657 (27 March1979).Google Scholar
8. Major, S., Banerjee, A. and Chopra, K. L., Thin Solid Films 122, 31 (1984).Google Scholar
9. Minami, T., Nanto, H. and Takata, S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 23, L280 (1984); T. Minami, H. Sato, H. Nanto and S. Takata, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 24, L781 (1985).Google Scholar
10. Qiu, S. N., Qiu, C. X. and Shih, I., Solar Energy Mater. 15, 261 (1987).Google Scholar
11. Vijayakumar, P. S., Blaker, K. A., Weiting, R. D., Wong, B., Halani, A. T. and Park, C., U.S. Patent No. 4, 751, 149 (1988).Google Scholar
12. Choi, B. H., Im, H. B., Song, J. S. and Yoon, K. H., Thin Solid Films 193, 712 (1990).Google Scholar
13. Hu, J. and Gordon, R. G., Solar Cells 30, 437 (1991).Google Scholar
14. Hu, J. and Gordon, R. G., J. Appl. Phys. 71, 880 (1992).Google Scholar
15. Hu, J. and Gordon, R. G., in Microcrystalline Semiconductors: Materials Science & Devices, edited by Fauchet, P. M, Tsai, C. C., Canham, L. T., Shimizu, I. and Aoyagi, Y. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 283, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993) pp. 891–896.Google Scholar
16. Hu, J. and Gordon, R. G., J. Appl. Phys. 72, 5381 (1992).Google Scholar
17. McCurdy, R. J., this volume.Google Scholar
18. Gordon, R. G., U.S. Patent 4,187,336 (5 February 1980); U.S. Patent 4, 419, 386 (6 December 1983).Google Scholar
19. Wanka, H., Lotter, E., and Shubert, M., in Amorphous Silicon Technology-1994, edited by Schiff, E. A., Hack, M., Madan, A., Powell, M. and Matsuda, A. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 336, Pittburgh, PA, 1994), pp. 657–662.Google Scholar