Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-qc88w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-24T18:41:42.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Process Modeling for Advanced Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Mark E. Law ,
Kevin S. Jones ,
Ljubo Radic ,
Robert Crosby ,
Mark Clark ,
Kevin Gable  and
Carrie Ross
Mark E. Law
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
Kevin S. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
Ljubo Radic
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
Robert Crosby
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
Mark Clark
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
Kevin Gable
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
Carrie Ross
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
Get access

Extract

As device lots become more and more expensive, process modeling is increasingly important. Process simulation and modeling is increasingly sophisticated but the accuracy remains a problem. There is generally a time lag between the introduction of a particular process and its accurate modeling – the problem of “yesterday's technology modeled tomorrow”. For many problems, absolute accuracy isn't required. Relative trends provide excellent information about the process in question. For this reason, process simulation is still a useful technique for guiding process development.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Crosby, Robert T., Jones, Kevin S., Law, Mark E., Larsen, A. Nylandsted and Hansen, J. Lundsgaard, “{311} Defect evolution in Si-implanted Si1−xGex alloys,” Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, 6(4) Pages 205–208, August 2003.Google Scholar
2. Haynes, T. E., Eaglesham, D. J. et al. , “Interactions of Ion-Implantation-Induced Interstitials with Boron at High Concentrations in Silicon.” Appl. Phys. Lett. 69(10), p. 1376–1378, 1996.Google Scholar
3. Lilak, A.D., Earles, S.K., Law, M.E., Jones, K.S., “Evolution of {311} Type Defects in Boron Doped Structures: Experimental Evidence of Boron-Interstitial Cluster Formation”, Applied Physics Letters, 74(14), p. 2038–40, April 5, 1999.Google Scholar
4. Avci, I., Law, M.E., Kuryliw, E., Saavedra, A.F., Jones, K.S., “Modeling Extended Defect ({311} and Dislocation) Nucleation and Evolution in Silicon”, Journal of Applied Physics, 95(5), p. 2452–2460, March 1, 2004.Google Scholar
5. Sadigh B, Lenosky TJ, Caturla MJ, Quong AA, Benedict LX, TD, de la Rubia, MM, Giles, Foad, M, CD, Spataru, SG, Louie, “Large Enhancement of Boron Solubility in Silicon due to Bi-axial Stress”, Applied Physics Letters, 80(25), p. 4738–40, June 24, 2002.Google Scholar
6. Fahey, P. M., Mader, S. R. et al. (1992). “Stress-Induced Dislocations in Silicon Integrated Circuits.” IBM Journal of Research and Development 36(2): 158–182.Google Scholar
7. Chaudhry, S. and Law, M. E. (1997). “The Stress Assisted Evolution of Point and Extended Defects in Silicon.” Journal of Applied Physics 82(3): 1138–1146.Google Scholar
8. Aziz, M. J. (1997). “Thermodynamics of Diffusion Under Pressure and Stress: Relation to Point Defect Mechanisms.” Appl. Phys. Lett. 70(21): 2810–2812.Google Scholar