Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:09:33.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Processing and Development of a New High Strength Metal Foam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

A. Rabiei*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695–7910, U.S.A.
Adrian T. O'Neill
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695–7910, U.S.A.
Brian P. Neville
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695–7910, U.S.A.
*
* Corresponding Author
Get access

Abstract

The research sited in this paper involves the development of new closed cell metal foam composite materials using powder metallurgy (PM) and gravity casting techniques. The foam is comprised of steel hollow spheres packed into a random dense arrangement, with the interstitial space between spheres occupied with a solid metal matrix. Using a casting technique, an aluminum alloy infiltrates the interstitial spaces between steel spheres. In a powder metallurgy method, steel spheres and iron powder are sintered to form a solid, closed cell structure. The measured densities of the Al-Fe composite foam and iron foam are 2.4 g/cm3 and 3.2 g/cm3, with relative densities of 42% and 41% respectively.

The hollow sphere metal foam composite materials developed in this study displayed superior compressive strength as compared to hollow sphere foams currently being produced. The compressive strength of the cast Al-Fe foam averaged 67 MPa over a region of 10 to 50% strain, while the steel PM foam averaged 45 MPa over the same strain region. Densification began at approximately 50% for the cast foam and 55% for the PM foam.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Degischer, H. P., Kriszt, B. (ed.), Handbook of Cellular Metals, Willey VCH, Weinheim 2002.Google Scholar
2. Gibson, L. J., Ashby, M. F., Cellular Solids, Structures and Properties, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1997.Google Scholar
3. Ashby, M. F., Evans, A., Fleck, N.A., Gibson, L. J., Hutchinson, J.W., Wadley, H. N. G., Metal Foams: A Design Guide, Butterworth-Heinemann, Massachusetts, 2000.Google Scholar
4. Banhart, J., Progress In Materials Science 46, 559632, (2001).Google Scholar
5. Rabiei, A., Evans, A.G., Hutchinson, J.W., “Heat Generation During the Fatigue of a Cellular Al Alloy,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 31A, pp 11291136.Google Scholar
6. Sugimura, Y., Rabiei, A., Evans, A.G., Harte, A.M., Fleck, N.A., “Compression Fatigue of a Cellular Al Alloy,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. A269, pp 3848.Google Scholar
7. Sugimura, Y., Meyer, J., He, M.Y., Bart-Smith, H., Grenstedt, J., Evans, A.G., “On the Mechanical Performance of Closed Cell Al Alloy Foams”, Acta Materialia, vol. 45 no 12, pp 52455259.Google Scholar
8. Grenestedt, J. L. in Influence Of Imperfections On Effective Properties Of Cellular Solids, edited by Schwartz, D. S., Shih, D.S., Evans, A.G., Wadley, H.N., (Mater. Res. Symp. Proc. 521, Warrendale, PA, 1998) pp. 313.Google Scholar
9. Kupp, Donald M., Dennis Claar, T., Stephani, Gunter, Waag, Ulf, “Fabrication of Ti-based Components with Controlled Porosity.”Google Scholar
10. Andersen, O., Waag, U., Schneider, L., Stephani, G., Kieback, B., “Novel Metallic Hollow Sphere Structures”, Advanced Engineering Materials 2000, 2, No. 4, pp 192195.Google Scholar
11. Lim, T. J., Smith, B., McDowell, D.L., “Behavior of a random hollow sphere metal foam”, Acta Materialia vol 50, no 11, pp. 28672879, 2002.Google Scholar
12. Smith, W.F., Structure And Properties Of Engineering Alloys, 2nd ed. edited by Gibala, R., Tirrell, M., Wert, C. (McGraw Hill, New York, NY, 1993) pp. 176232.Google Scholar
13. German, Randall M., Particle Packing Characteristics, Metal Powder Industries Federation, Princeton, NJ, 1989.Google Scholar
14. ASM Metals Handbook, 9th Edition, vol 7 Powder Metallurgy, American Society for Metals, 1984.Google Scholar
15. Dautzenberg, N., Powder Metallurgy International, vol 12, 1971.Google Scholar
16. Dautzenberg, N., Hewing, J., Powder Metallurgy International, vol 9, 1977.Google Scholar
17. Forss, L., “Factors Influencing Properties of Sintered Iron” in Perspectives in Powder Metallurgy, Vol 3, Plenum Press, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
18. German, Randall M., Powder Metallurgy of Iron and Steel, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1998.Google Scholar
19. Simone, A.E., Gibson, L.J., “Effects of Solid Distribution on the Stiffness and Strength of Metallic Foams”, Acta Materialia, vol 46, 1998, pp 21392150.Google Scholar
20. Bart-Smith, H., Bastawros, A. F., Mumm, D. R., Evans, A. G., Sypeck, D. J., Wadley, H. N. G., “Compressive deformation and yielding mechanisms in cellular Al alloys determined using X-ray tomography and surface strain mapping”, Acta Materialia, vol 46, 1998, pp 35833592.Google Scholar