Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hqlzj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-22T21:19:20.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Processing, Structure, and Morphology of Graphitic Carbon Foams Produced from Anisotropic Pitch

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

D. Dutta ,
Charles S. Hill  and
David P. Anderson
D. Dutta
Affiliation:
Wright Materials Research Inc., Dayton, OH 45437
Charles S. Hill
Affiliation:
University of Dayton Research Institute, 300 College Park, Dayton, OH 45469-0168
David P. Anderson
Affiliation:
University of Dayton Research Institute, 300 College Park, Dayton, OH 45469-0168
Get access

Abstract

In order to produce a three-dimensional interconected graphitic network, foams were produced from carbon fiber precursor pitch and processed similarly to high modulus carbon fibers. Uniform size distributions of open spherical cell graphitic carbon foams were produced by microcellular foam blowing of anisotropic pitch using homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation. The widths of cell walls and ligaments were in the range of the diameters of pitch-based carbon fibers (7-10 μm) and possessed significant alignment of anisotropic pitch crystallites.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 349: Symposium T – Novel Forms of Carbon II , 1994 , 61
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Hall, R. B., and Hager, J. W., 21st Biennial Conf. on Carbon Proc., Buffalo, NY, 100 (1993).Google Scholar
2. Hager, J. W., and Lake, M. L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 270, 29, (1992).Google Scholar
3. Hager, J. W., and Anderson, D. P., 21st Biennial Conf. on Carbon Proc., Buffalo, NY, 102 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Anderson, D. P., Gunnison, K. E., and Hager, J. W., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 270, 47, (1992).Google Scholar
5. Hager, J. W., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 270, 41, (1992).Google Scholar
6. Colton, J. S., and Suh, N. P., Polym. Eng. Sci., 27, 493, (1987).Google Scholar
7. Colton, J. S., and Suh, N. P., Polym. Eng. Sci., 27, 500, (1987).Google Scholar
8. Kumar, V., and Suh, N. P., Polym. Eng. Sci., 30, 1323, (1990).Google Scholar
9. Mehta, R., Anderson, D. P., Hager, J. W., and Thorp, K. E. G., 21st Biennial Conf. on Carbon Proc., Buffalo, NY, 104 (1993).Google Scholar
10. Kumar, V., and Weller, J. E., SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers, 37, 1401, (1991).Google Scholar
11. Brooks, J.D. and Taylor, G.H., Carbon, 4, 243 (1968).Google Scholar
12. White, J. L., The Formation of Microstructure in Graphitizable Carbons, Aerospace Corporation Report No. F04701-73-C-0074, (1974).Google Scholar
13. Lafdi, K., Bonnamy, S., and Oberlin, A., Carbon, 29, 831 (1991).Google Scholar