Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:03:04.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantitative Evaluation of Crack Bridging in Fully Lamellar Ti-48A1-2Cr-2Nb

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

D. J. Wissuchek ,
G. E. Lucas  and
A. G. Evans
D. J. Wissuchek
Affiliation:
Materials Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
G. E. Lucas
Affiliation:
Materials Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
A. G. Evans
Affiliation:
Division of Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
Get access

Abstract

The toughening effect of ligaments in a fully lamellar Ti-48Al-2Cr-2Nb alloy has been determined by evaluation of J integrals of the crack tip and crack wake regions from surface strain maps. The crack tip fracture toughness KtiP was found to vary with lamellae orientation and ranged from Ktip = 13 MPa√m for inter-lamellar fracture to Ktip = 19.5 MPa√m for translamellar fracture The bridging contribution to fracture toughness was found to arise from a bimodal distribution of ligament sizes. Fracture surface reconstructions showed a distribution of large hinges that initiated at grain or subcolony boundaries and smaller ligaments associated with delaminations within a grain. The stress-displacement functions for these two ligament populations have been determined from a large scale bridging analysis of the resistance curves along with fractographic information. The small ligamerts appear to account for the initial rapid rise in crack growth resistance; and the large hinges, for the slow continued rise in toughness at large crack extensions.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 364: Symposium L – High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys–VI , 1994 , 481
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Chan, K., JOM, 44(5), 30 (1992)Google Scholar
2. Chan, K., Metall. Trans. A., 22A, 2021 (1991)Google Scholar
3. Deve, H., Evans, A., Shih, D., Acta Metall., 40 1259 (1992)Google Scholar
4. Chan, K., and Kim, Y., Metall. Trans. A., 25A, 1217 (1994)Google Scholar
5. Wissuchek, D., Mackin, T., DeGraef, M., Lucas, G., A. Evans, Experimental Mechanics, in pressGoogle Scholar
6. Rice, J., J. Appl. Mech., 35 379 (1968)Google Scholar
7. Ogawa, K., Zhang, X. J., Kobayashi, T., Armstrong, R. W., Irwin, G. R., ASTM-STP-833, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA (1984) 393.Google Scholar
8. Kobayashi, T. and Shockey, D. A., Met. Trans., 18A (1987) 1941.Google Scholar
9. Edsinger, K., Odette, G.R., Lucas, G.E., and Wirth, B., Effects of Radiation in Materials: 17th International, Gelles, Nanstad, Kumar, Little, Editors, ASTM-STP, (in press).Google Scholar
10. He, M., Heredia, F., Wissuchek, D., Shaw, M., and Evans, A., Acta Metall., 41 1223 (1992)Google Scholar
11. Chao, B. L. and Odette, G. R., unpublished research.Google Scholar