Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:02:04.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quasicrystalline Coatings Through Laser Processing: A Study on Process Optimisation and Microstructure Evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

K. Chattopadhyay
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy Indian Institute of Science Bangalore 560012, India
K. Biswas
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy Indian Institute of Science Bangalore 560012, India
S. Bysakh
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy Indian Institute of Science Bangalore 560012, India
G. Phanikumar
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy Indian Institute of Science Bangalore 560012, India
A. Weisheit
Affiliation:
IWW, Technical University of Clausthal Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany
R. Galun
Affiliation:
IWW, Technical University of Clausthal Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany
B. Mordike
Affiliation:
IWW, Technical University of Clausthal Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Composite coatings containing quasicrystalline (QC) phases in Al-Cu-Fe alloys were prepared by laser cladding using a mixture of the elemental powders. Two substrates, namely pure aluminum and an Al-Si alloy were used. The clad layers were remelted at different scanning velocities to alter the growth conditions of different phases. The process parameters were optimized to produce quasicrystalline phases. The evolution of the microstructure in the coating layer was characterized by detailed microstructural investigation. The results indicate presence of quasicrystals in the aluminum substrate. However, only approximant phase could be observed in the substrate of Al-Si alloys. It is shown that there is a significant transport of Si atoms from the substrate to the clad layer during the cladding and remelting process. The hardness profiles of coatings on aluminum substrate indicate a very high hardness. The coating on Al-Si alloy, on the other hand, is ductile and soft. The fracture toughness of the hard coating on aluminum was obtained by nano-indentation technique. The K1C value was found to be 1.33 MPa m1/2 which is typical of brittle materials.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Schectman, D., Blech, I., Gratias, D., Cahn, J.W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 53(20),1951 (1984)Google Scholar
2. Tsai, A. P., Inoue, A., and Masumoto, T., Jpn. J. App. Phys. 26, L1505 (1987)Google Scholar
3. Kang, S. S., Dubois, J. M., and Stebut, J. von., J. Mate. Res.,8, 2471 (1993)Google Scholar
4. Archambault, P. and Janot, C., MRS Bull. 22,.48 (1997)Google Scholar
5. Basser, M. F. and Eisenhammer, T., MRS Bull. 22,.59 (1997)Google Scholar
6. Sordelet, D. J. and Dubois, J. M., MRS Bull., 22,.34 (1997)Google Scholar
7. Dubois, J. M., Kang, S.S. and Perrot, A., Mater. Sc. and Engg. A179,122 (1994)Google Scholar
8. Tritt, T. M., Science, 283, 804 (1999)Google Scholar
9. Dubois, J. M., Kang, S.S. and Stebut, J. von., J.Mater. Sc.Lett, 10, 537 (1991)Google Scholar
10. Liu, P., Stigenberg, A.H. and Nilson, J.-O., Acta Metall.Meter.,43(7), 2881 (1995)Google Scholar
11.Industries de Techniques (French Publication) 784, 17 (1997)Google Scholar
12. Vilar, R., J. Laser Applications, 11 (2),64 (1999)Google Scholar
13. Baumeister, G., Skrotzki, Birgit and Eggler, Gunther, Prakt. Metallogr. 34,.8, (1997),Google Scholar
14. Audebert, F., Colaco, R., Viller, R. and Sirkin, H., Scripta. Mater., 40(5), 551 (1999)Google Scholar
15. Lee, S.M., Kim, B.H., Kim, W.T. and Kim, D.H., Materials Science and Engineering (in press).Google Scholar
16. Tsai, A.P., Inoue, A., and Masumoto, T., J. of Mat. Sci. Letts 8, 470 (1989)Google Scholar
17. Quivy, A., Quiquandon, M., Calvayrac, Y.., Faudot, F., Gratias, D., Berger, C., Brands, R.A., Simnonet, V., and Hippert, F., J.Phys. Condens.Matter., 8, 4223 (1996)Google Scholar
18. Yokoyama, Y., Inoue, A. and Masumoto, T., Mater. Trans. JIM 34, 135 (1993)Google Scholar
19. Anstis, G.R, Chantikul, P, Lawn, B.R and Marshall, D.B, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 64, 533 (1981).Google Scholar