Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-65tv2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-07T06:26:35.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recent Developments in Experimental and Theoretical Studies of The Mechanical Behavior of Polycrystalline Silicon for Microelectromechanical Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

R. Ballarini
R. Ballarini*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-7201, rxb7@po.cwru.edu.
Get access

Abstract

A review of recent developments in experimental and theoretical studies of the mechanicalbehavior of polycrystalline silicon structures whose dimensions are comparable to those of typicalmicro electromechanical systems devices is presented. It is concluded that although great strides have been made towards understanding this behavior, there is a need to develop robust standardized experimental techniques, and in turn, material data bases that are required to verify and calibrate predictive models for calculating device reliability.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1] Sharpe, W.N. Jr., Yuan, B. and Edwards, R.L., “Variations in mechanical properties of polysilicon,” Proceedings of 43rd International Symposium of the Instrumentation Society of America, Orlando, FL, pp. 179–188, 1997.Google Scholar
[2] Sharpe, W.N. Jr., Yuan, B., Edwards, R.L. and Vaidyanathan, R., “Measurements of Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio, and Tensile Strength of Polysilicon,” Proceedings of the Tenth IEEE International Workshop on Microelectromechanical Systems, Nagoya, Japan pp. 424–429, 1997.Google Scholar
[3] Marxer, C., Gretillat, M.-A., de Rooij, N.F., Battig, R., Anthamatten, O., Valk, B. and Vogel, P., “Reliability considerations for electrostatic polysilicon actuators using as an example the REMO component,” Sensors and Actuators A61, pp. 449–454, 1997.Google Scholar
[4] Ballarini, R., Mullen, R.L., Kahn, H. and Heuer, A.H., “The fracture toughness of polysilicon microdevices,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Vol. 518, pp. 137–142, 1998.Google Scholar
[5] Sharpe, W.N. Jr., Brown, S., Johnson, G.C. and Knauss, W., “Round robin tests of modulus and strength of polysilicon,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Vol. 518, pp. 57–61, 1998.Google Scholar
[6] Marxer, C.R., “Silicon micromechanics for applications in fiber optic communication,” Doctor of Science Dissertation, University of Neuchâtel, 1997.Google Scholar
[7] Brown, S.B., Van Arsdell, W. and Muhlstein, C.L., “Materials reliability in MEMS devices,” Transducers 1997, 1997 International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators, Chicago, Illinois, June 16–19, 1997.Google Scholar
[8] Kahn, H., Ballarini, R., Mullen, R.L. and Heuer, A.H., “Electrostatically actuated failure of microfabricated polysilicon fracture mechanics specimens,” to appear in Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.Google Scholar
[9] Tsuchiya, T., Tabata, O., Sakata, J., and Taga, Y., “Tensile testing of polycrystalline silicon thin films using electrostatic force grip,” Transactions of Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan, Vol. 116-E, No. 10, pp. 441–446 (1996).Google Scholar
[10] Tsuchiya, T., Obata, O., Sakata, J. and Taga, Y., “Specimen size effect on tensile strength of surface micromachined polycrystalline silicon thin films,” Proceedings of the Tenth IEEE International Workshop on Microelectromechanical Systems, Nagoya, Japan, pp. 529–534, 1997; also Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems 7, pp. 106–113, 1998.Google Scholar
[11] Tsuchiya, T., Sakata, J., and Taga, Y., “Tensile strength and fracture toughness of surface micromachined polycrystalline silicon thin films prepared under various conditions,” Materials Research Society Proceedings, Vol. 505 (in press).Google Scholar
[12] Sharpe, W.N. Jr., Turner, K. and Edwards, R.L., “Polysilicon Tensile Testing with Electrostatic Gripping", Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 518, pp. 191–1961, 1998.Google Scholar
[13] Sharpe, W.N. Jr., Turner, K. and Edwards, R.L., “Measurements of the Effect of Specimen Size on Young's Modulus and Tensile Strength of Polysilicon”, Late News Proceedings of the Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, Hilton Head Island, SC, accepted for publication (June 1998).Google Scholar
[14] Chasiotis, I. and Knauss, W., “Mechanical properties of thin polysilicon films by means of probe microscopy,” Materials and Device Characterization in Micromachining, SPIE Vol. 3512, 1998.Google Scholar
[15] Mullen, R.L., Ballarini, R., Yin, Y. and Heuer, A.H., “Monte Carlo simulation of effective elastic constants of polycrystalline thin films,” Acta mater., Vol. 45, No. 6, pp. 2247–2255, 1997.Google Scholar
[16] Mirfendereski, D., Kiureghian, A. Der, Ferrari, M. and Johnson, G., “Probabilistic characterization and response prediction of micro-electro-mechanical sytems,” Report (University of California, Berkeley: Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Materials), UCB/SEMM-96/04, 1996.Google Scholar
[17] Ballarini, R., Mullen, R.L. and Heuer, A.H., “The effects of heterogeneity and anisotropy on the size effect in cracked polycrystalline films,” to appear in International Journal of Fracture.Google Scholar
[18] Abdel-Tawab, K. and Rodin, G.J., “Fracture size effects and polycrystalline inhomogeneity,” MSS&M Report No. 97/12, Research Center for Mechanics of Solids, Structures & Materials, The University of Texas at Austin, July 1997.Google Scholar