Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:43:07.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Redox Systematics in Model Glass Compositions from West Valley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

Henry D. Schreiber ,
Charlotte W. SCHREIBER  and
Cary C. Ward
Henry D. Schreiber
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Virginia Military Institute, Lexington, VA 24450
Charlotte W. SCHREIBER
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Virginia Military Institute, Lexington, VA 24450
Cary C. Ward
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Virginia Military Institute, Lexington, VA 24450
Get access

Abstract

At a processing temperature of 1150°C for model West Valley glass compositions, the prescribed range of oxygen fugacities needed to achieve an [Fe2+]/[Fe3+] of 0.1 to 0.5 is 10−4 to 10−7 atm. Establishment of the Fe2+-Fe0 equilibrium, resulting in metal precipitation from the melt, occurs at oxygen fugacities lower than 10−11 atm at this temperature. The target processing range as defined by the iron redox ratio is equally valid at both lower and higher temperatures (±100°C). Elevations of the concentrations of redox-active components to I wt% Cr2O3, 1 wt% NiO, 1 wt% CuO, 1 wt% CeO2, and 4 wt% Mn2O3 in the waste glass will not affect the redox limits as established by the iron redox ratio of 0.1 to 0.5; these limits provide sufficiently large margins of safety to assure no stabilization of reduced or oxidized forms of these elements.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 294: Symposium V – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVI , 1992 , 87
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Bickford, D. F., Applewhite-Ramsey, A., Jantzen, C. M., and Brown, K. G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73(10), 2896–2902 (1990).Google Scholar
[2] Goldman, D. S. and Brite, D. W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 69(5), 411–413 (1986).Google Scholar
[3] Schreiber, H. D. and Hockman, A. L., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 70(4), 591–594 (1987).Google Scholar
[4] Jones, D. R. IV, Jansheski, W. C., and Goldman, D. S., Anal. Chem. 53, 923–924 (1981).Google Scholar
[5] Close, W. P. and Tillman, J. F., Glass Technol. 10, 134–146 (1969).Google Scholar
[6] Schreiber, H. D., J. Geophys. Res. 90(B9), 9225–9232 (1987).Google Scholar
[7] Schreiber, H. D., Schreiber, C. W., Riethmiller, M. W., and Downey, J. S. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIII, edited by Oversby, V. M. and Brown, P. W. (Mat. Res. Soc., 1990), pp. 419–426.Google Scholar