Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T06:20:11.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Representation Of Finite Cracks By Dislocation Pileups: An Application To Atomic Simulation Of Fracture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Vijay Shastry  and
Diana Farkas
Vijay Shastry
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Virginia Tech., Blacksburg VA 24061.
Diana Farkas
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Virginia Tech., Blacksburg VA 24061.
Get access

Abstract

The elastic displacement field solution of a semi-infinite crack in an anisotropic body, calculated using a complex variable approach due to Sih and Liebowitz, is usually used by atomistic simulations of fracture. The corresponding expression for the displacement field of a finite crack is numerically cumbersome since it involves multiple square roots of complex numbers. In this study, displacement field of the crack is calculated by superposing the displacements of dislocations in an equivalent double pileup, equilibrated under mode I conditions. An advantage of this method is its extensibility to atomistic studies of more complex systems containing multiple cracks or interfaces. The pileup representation of the finite crack is demonstrated as being equivalent to its corresponding continuum description using the example of a double ended crack in a-Fe, loaded in mode I. In these examples, the interatomic interaction in α-Fe is described by an empirical embedded atom (EAM) potential.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 409: Symposium Q – Fracture-Instablility Dynamics, scaling and Ductile/Brittle Behavior , 1995 , 133
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cheung, K. S. and Yip, S., Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci.Eng. 2, 865 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Hoagland, R. G., Daw, M. S., Foiles, S. M., and Baskes, M. I., J. Mater. Res. 5, 313 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Becquart, C. S., Clapp, P. C., and Rifkin, J. A., Molecular dynamics simulations of fracture in RuAl, in Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc, volume 288, pages 519–524, Materials Research Society, 1993.Google Scholar
4. Sih, G. C. and Liebowitz, H., Mathematical theories of brittle fracture, in Fracture – An Advanced Treatise, edited by Liebowitz, H., volume II, pages 69–189, Academic Press, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
5. Hirth, J. P. and Lothe, J., Theory of Dislocations, John Wiley and Sons, 1982.Google Scholar
6. Simonelli, G., Pasianot, R., and Savino, E. J., Embedded- atom- method interatomic potentials for bcc-iron, in Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc, volume 291, pages 567–572, Materials Research Society, 1993.Google Scholar
7. Beltz, G. E. and Rice, J. R., Dislocation nucleation versus cleavage decohesion at crack tips, in Modeling the deformation of Crystalline Solids, edited by Lowe, T. C., Rollet, A. D., Follansbee, P. S., and Daehn, G. S., pages 457–480, Warrendale, PA, 1991.Google Scholar
8. Erdogan, F. and Gupta, G. D., Q. Appi. Math. 29, 525 (1972).Google Scholar
9. Shastry, V. and Farkas, D., Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar