Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:38:33.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response Time For Optical Emission And Mass Spectrometric Signals During Etching Of Heterostructures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

S. Thomas
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109–2122
H. H. Chen III
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109–2122
S. W. Pang
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109–2122
Get access

Abstract

Plasma etching of III-V heterostructures has been monitored using optical emission spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. For the Ga optical emission signal at 417.2 nm, a response time as fast as 0.2 s has been measured. The response time of the mass spectrometer is limited by the transit time of etch products from the wafer surface to the ionizer. A minimum response time of 0.9 s was measured by reducing the signal integration time of the mass spectrometer. Saturation of the optical emission signal has been shown to be related to the residence time of etch gases by varying the flow rate or pressure. Decreasing residence time by reducing the pressure from 6 to 2 mTorr and maintaining a constant flow rate caused the Ga emission signal saturation time to decrease from 7 to 3 min. The 145ASC12+ signal saturated before the Ga emission signal at 417.2 nm. Endpoint detection for etching an AlInAs emitter and stopping on a GaInAs base was studied. By monitoring the changes in the Ga emission intensity, only 2 nm of the GaInAs base layer had been removed when the emitter etch was stopped.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Pearton, S. J., Ren, F., Abernathy, C. R., and Constantine, C., Mat. Sci. Engin. B23, 36 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Melville, D. L., Simmons, J. G., and Thompson, D. A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 11, 2038 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Seaward, K. L., Moll, N. J., Coulman, D. J., and Stickle, W. F., J. Appl. Phys. 61, 2358 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Angell, D. and Oehrlein, G. S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 240 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Collot, P., Diallo, T., and Canteloup, J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 9, 2497 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Mishra, U. K., Jensen, J. F., Rensch, D. B., Brown, A. S., Stanchina, W. E., Trew, R. J., Pierce, M. W., and Kargodorian, T. V., IEEE Electron Device Lett. EDL–10, 467 (1989).Google Scholar
7. Thomas, S. III, Ko, K. K., and Pang, S. W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 13, 894 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Tedder, L. L., Rubloff, G. W., Shareef, I., Anderle, M., Kim, D.-H., and Parsons, G. N., J.Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13, 1924 (1995).Google Scholar
9. Pang, S. W., Sung, K. T., and Ko, K. K., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 10, 1118 (1992).Google Scholar
10. Kahaian, D. J., Thomas, S. III, and Pang, S. W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13, 253 (1995).Google Scholar
11. Tsujimoto, K., Kumihashi, T., Kofuji, N., and Tachi, S., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 12, 1209 (1994).Google Scholar