Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T18:58:48.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Role of Friction in the Mechanics of Non-bonded Random Fiber Networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Gopinath Subramanian
Affiliation:
gsub@scorec.rpi.edu
R. Catalin Picu
Affiliation:
picuc@rpi.edu, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Dept. Mech. Eng., 110, 8th St., Troy, New York, 12180, United States
Get access

Abstract

The mechanics of systems of non-cross-linked fiber networks is studied in this work using a computational model inspired from the bead-spring models of polymeric melts. The fibers have random orientation and distribution in space, interact via stiff repulsive potentials and are characterized by their axial and bending stiffness. Fiber-fiber Coulombian friction is considered. The system is subjected to isostatic compression (strain control) and various statistical measures are evaluated. As the system is compacted, a critical density is reached at which stiffness develops. At this stage there is in average one fiber-fiber contact per fiber and the fiber free segment length has a uniform probability distribution function. Upon further compaction, the number of contacts per fiber increases and the segment length distribution becomes exponential. The respective cross-over densities depend on the fiber length and the friction coefficient. Significant hysteresis is observed upon loading-unloading in the total energy and the number of contacts per fiber. It is also observed that the distribution of contact energies in the range of densities where the system forms a topological network is a power law.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Alberts, B., Bray, D., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., and Watson, M., New York: Garland, (1994)Google Scholar
[2] Head, D.A., Levine, A.J., and MacKintosh, F.C., Phys. Rev. E, 72, 061914 (2005)Google Scholar
[3] Poquillon, D., Viguier, B., and Andrieu, E., J. Mater. Sci. 40, 5963 (2005)Google Scholar
[4] Masse, J., Salvo, L., Rodney, D., Brechet, Y., and Bouaziz, O., Scripta Materialia, 54, 1383 (2006)Google Scholar
[5] Durville, D., J. Mater. Sci. 40, 5941 (2005)Google Scholar
[6] Rodney, D., Fivel, M., and Dendievel, R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 108004 (2005)Google Scholar
[7] Barbier, C., Dendievel, R., and Rodney, D., Proceedings of the 18th Congres Francais de Mecanique, (2007)Google Scholar
[8] Subramanian, G. and Shanbhag, S., Int. J. Multi. Comput. Eng., 7, 63 (2009)Google Scholar