Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T23:22:30.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Site Occupation and Defect Structure of Fe2Nb Laves Phase in Fe-Nb-M Ternary Systems at Elevated Temperatures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2018

Shigehiro Ishikawa ,
Takashi Matsuo ,
Naoki Takata  and
Masao Takeyama
Shigehiro Ishikawa
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Ceramics Science, Tokyo Institute of Technology, S8-8, 2-12-1, Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 152-8552, Japan
Takashi Matsuo
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Ceramics Science, Tokyo Institute of Technology, S8-8, 2-12-1, Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 152-8552, Japan Consortium of JRCM (The Japan Research and Development Center for Metals)
Naoki Takata
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Ceramics Science, Tokyo Institute of Technology, S8-8, 2-12-1, Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 152-8552, Japan Consortium of JRCM (The Japan Research and Development Center for Metals)
Masao Takeyama
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Ceramics Science, Tokyo Institute of Technology, S8-8, 2-12-1, Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 152-8552, Japan Consortium of JRCM (The Japan Research and Development Center for Metals)
Get access

Abstract

For the Fe2Nb Laves phase with C14 structure in the Fe-Nb-M (M : Cr, Mn, Co, Ni) systems, the site occupation of M in Fe2Nb has been examined in terms of XRD Rietveld analysis, particularly paying attention to the two Fe sublattice sites of Fe1 (36-net in the triple layer : t) and Fe2 (kagome-net of the single layer : s) with the fraction of 0.25 and 0.75, respectively. In any these four ternary systems, the Fe2Nb Laves phase region largely extends along the equi-Nb concentration direction; for Mn complete solid solubility exists, and the solubility of Cr and Co in Fe2Nb is more than 50 at.% and that of Ni is 44 at.%. Thus, at least two thirds of all Fe sublattices in Fe2Nb are occupied by M in all cases. Rietveld analysis revealed that Cr and Mn with which have a larger atomic size than Fe prefer to occupy the Fe1 sublattice site when the amount in solution is less than 0.25 fraction of Fe in Fe2Nb and the preferred occupation site changes to the Fe2 sublattice site when the amount in solution increases beyond 0.25. In contrast, Co and Ni whose atomic size is smaller than Fe preferentially occupy the Fe2 sublattice site, regardless of the amount. The c/a ratio of stoichiometoric Fe2Nb increases and becomes closer to the ideal value (1.633) of the cubic C15 structure when the Fe1 sublattice site is occupied by Cr and Mn. However, the degree of symmetries of both tetrahedron and kagome-net formed by Fe atoms become better when Fe2 sublattice site is occupied by a certain amount of Ni.

Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1128: Symposium U – Advanced Intermetallic-Based Alloys for Extreme Environment and Energy Applications , 2008 , 1128-U08-04
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Takeyama, M., Yokota, H., Ghanem, M. M., and Matsuo, T., Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 117, 3 (2001).Google Scholar
2. Takeyama, M., Report of JSPS 123rd Committee on Heat-Resisting Materials and Alloys, 45, 51 (2004).Google Scholar
3. Takeyama, M., Kinzoku, 76, 743 (2006).Google Scholar
4. Sugiura, T., Ishikawa, S., Matsuo, T., and Takeyama, M., Material Science Forum 561-565, 435 (2007).Google Scholar
5. Gomi, N., Morita, S., Matsuo, T., and Takeyama, M., Report of JSPS 123rd Committee on Heat-Resisting Materials and Alloys, 45, 157 (2004).Google Scholar
6. Takeyama, M., Gomi, N., Morita, S., and Matsuo, T., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp., 842, 461 (2006).Google Scholar
7. Takeyama, M., Morita, S., Yamauchi, A., Yamanaka, M., and Matsuo, T., Superalloys 718, 625, 706 and Various Derivatives, TMS, 333, (2001).Google Scholar
8. Chisholm, M. F., Kumar, S., and Hazzledine, P., Science, 307, 701 (2005).Google Scholar
9. Izumi, F., Rigaku Journal, 31, 17 (2000).Google Scholar
10. Toraya, H., Rigaku Journal, 28, 3 (1997).Google Scholar
11. Ishikawa, S., Yamashita, M., Matsuo, T., Takata, N., and Takeyama, M., 17th IFHTSE Congress 2008 submitted, (2008).Google Scholar
12. Kaloev, N. I., Sokolovskaya, E. M., Abram’yan, A. Kh., Kulova, L.K., and Agaeva, F. A., Russian Metallurgy, Tranaslated from Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR, Metally, 4, 207 (1987).Google Scholar