Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:56:49.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Solving the Structure of the Phases in the Al-Mg-Si Alloy System with the Help of Ab Initio Modelling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

A. G. Froseth
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, NTNU, 7491 Trondheim, NORWAY
S. J. Andersen
Affiliation:
SINTEF Materials Technology, Applied Physics, 7491 Trondheim, NORWAY
C. D. Marioara
Affiliation:
SINTEF Materials Technology, Applied Physics, 7491 Trondheim, NORWAY
P. M. Derlet
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, NTNU, 7491 Trondheim, NORWAY
R. Hoier
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, NTNU, 7491 Trondheim, NORWAY
Get access

Abstract

The Al-Mg-Si (6xxx-series) alloy system is a precipitation hardened alloy gaining much of its strength from precipitate phases acting as pinning centers for dislocation movement. Five years ago, Zandbergen, Andersen and coworkers identified the crystallography of the so-called β″ phase, one of the main hardening phases, using solely electron microscopy techniques [1]. Later, several other phases have been identified using high resolution microscopy. To solve the crystallography of these phases and to get an increased understanding of the electronic structure and bonding, ab initio modeling has proven to be a valuable tool. We present results from calculations on two recently discovered phases and show how ab initio modeling can give insight into the bonding trends and electronic structure of the phases in this alloy system.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Zandbergen, H. W., Andersen, S. J. and Jansen, J., Science 277, 1221 (1997)Google Scholar
2. Murayama, M. and Hono, K., Acta Mater. 47, 137 (1999)Google Scholar
3. Matsuda, K. et. al., Jour. Mater. Sci., 35, 179 (2000)Google Scholar
4. Andersen, S. J., Marioara, C. D., Froseth, A. G., Vissers, R., and Zandbergen, H. (to be published) Google Scholar
5. Blaha, P., Schwarz, K., Madsen, G., Kvasnicka, D., and Luitz, J., WIEN2k, An Augmented Plane Wave + Local Orbitals Program for Calculating Crystal Properties, (Karlheinz Schwarz, Techn. Universitat Wien, Austria, 1999), ISBN 3–9501031–1–2.Google Scholar
6. Kohn, W. and Sham, L. J., Phys. Rev. 69, B864 (1965)Google Scholar
7. Slater, J. C., Advances in Quantum Chemistry, 1, 32 (1964)Google Scholar
8. Perdew, J. P., Burke, S., and Ernzerhof, M., Phys. Rev. Lett., 77, 3865 (1996)Google Scholar
9. Yu, R., Singh, D. and Krakauer, H., Phys. Rev. B, 43, 6411 (1991)Google Scholar
10. Cheng, C., Hoffman, R., Nesper, R., and von Schnering, H., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 108, 1876 (1986)Google Scholar
11. Blochl, P. E., Jepsen, O., and Andersen, O. K., Phys. Rev. B, 49, 16223 (1994)Google Scholar