Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:35:51.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spin Polarized Photoemission from Fe On CU(100)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

D.P. Pappas
Affiliation:
IBM Research Division, Almaden Research Center, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, CA
K.-P. KÄmper
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, University of California, Irvine, CA 92717
B.P. Miller
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, University of California, Irvine, CA 92717
H. Hopster
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, University of California, Irvine, CA 92717
D.E. Fowler
Affiliation:
IBM Research Division, Almaden Research Center, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, CA
A.C. Luntz
Affiliation:
IBM Research Division, Almaden Research Center, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, CA
C.R. Brundle
Affiliation:
IBM Research Division, Almaden Research Center, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, CA
Z.-X. Shen
Affiliation:
Stanford Electronics Laboratory, Stanford, CA, 94305
Get access

Abstract

The spin resolved electronic structure of ultra-thin Fe films on Cu(100) was investigated using spin polarized angle resolved photoemission spectroscopy. All exchange splitting of the Fe ∆s band of 2.5 eV is observed for photon energies between 20 and 30 eV. ∆ peak at 6 eV binding energy which has been previously identified as a many-electron resonance was observed only after contamination of the films with oxygen. In addition, the spin dependent attenuation lengths for electrons in Fe were measured at 11, 19, and 40 eV above Ef. The attenuation length for the minority spin electrons was found to be shorter than that of the majority spin electrons. The difference between the two attenuation lengths was shown to increase at low energy. Short attenuation lengths of ≃3 monolayer were measured at II eV. The large increase of the attenuation length at low energy which is expected from the “universal curve” is not observed in Fe.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Abraham, D.L. and Hopster, H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1352 (1987).Google Scholar
2 Pappas, D.P., Kamper, K.-P., Miller, B.P., Hopster, H., Fowler, D. E., Brundle, C.R., Luntz, A.C., and Shen, Z.-X., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 504 (1991).Google Scholar
3 Liu, S.H., Quinn, J., Tian, D. and Jona, F., Surf. Sci. 209, 364 (1989).Google Scholar
4 Bagayoko, D. and Callaway, J., Phys. Rev. B 28, 5419 (1983).Google Scholar
5 Morruzzi, V.L., private communication.Google Scholar
6 Seah, M.P. and Dench, W.A., Surf. and Interf. Analy. I, 2 (1979).Google Scholar
7 Penn, D.R. and Girvin, S.M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 518 (1985).Google Scholar
8 Powell, A., Jour. Elec. Spec. and Relat. Phen. 47, 197 (1988).Google Scholar
9 Jablonski, A.., Surf. Sci. 188, 164 (1987).Google Scholar
10 Gokhale, M. and Mills, D.L., to be published.Google Scholar
11 Tillmann, D., Thiel, R. and Kisker, E., Z. Phys. B 77, 1 (1989).Google Scholar
12 Hlopster, H., Abraham, D.L. and Pappas, D.P., J. Appl. Phys. 64, 5927 (1988).Google Scholar
13 Steigerwald, D.A., Jacob, I. and Egelhoff, W.F. Jr, Surf. Sci. 202, 472 (1988).Google Scholar
14 Liu, C., Cochran, J.F. and Bader, S.D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2422 (1988).Google Scholar
15 Pappas, D.P., Kimper, K.-I., Hopster, H., Phys. Rev. lett. 64, 3179 (1990).Google Scholar
16 Hermanson, J., Solid State Commun. 22, 9 (1977).Google Scholar
17 Kisker, E., Schrbder, K., Gtidat, W. and Campagna, M., Phys. Rev. B 31, 329 (1985).Google Scholar
18 Hezaveh, A. Amiri, Jennings, G., Pescia, D., and Willis, R. F., Prince, K., Surman, M., and Bradshaw, A., Solid State Comm. 57, 329 (1986).Google Scholar
19 Kirschner, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 973 (1985).Google Scholar
20 Meier, F., Bona, G.L and Hütner, S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1152 (1984).Google Scholar