Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:25:00.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Strain Measurement in Two-Dimensional Nanoscale Si Gratings by High Resolution X-Ray Diffraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

So Tanaka
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
Christopher C. Umbach
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
Qun Shen
Affiliation:
Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source (CHESS) and School of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
Jack M. Blakely
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
Get access

Abstract

The strain induced by thermal oxidation in a cylindrical silicon (Si) structure has been studied by high resolution synchrotron x-ray diffraction. The strain in the structure studied is expected to display some of the features that exist in three-dimensional non-planar surfaces in electronic devices. The sample consisted of a 2-dimensional array, with period of 300nm, of approximately cylindrical pillars covered with a thin thermal oxide (thickness ∼6nm). These showed a tensile strain of 3.7×10-4 at room temperature. This strain can be relaxed elastically by chemical removal of the oxide. Process simulation indicates the importance of both the contribution due to interface stress during the oxide growth and stress due to differential thermal contraction during the cooldown. Significant differences exist between the strain in such cylindrical pillars and in a flat wafer.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. VLSI Technology, edited by Sze, S. M. (New York, McGraw-Hill, 1988) p.98140.Google Scholar
2. Kao, D., McVittie, J. P., and Nix, W. D., Saraswat, K. C., IEEE Trans. Elect. Dev. ED–34, 1008 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Marcus, R. B., Ravi, T. S., and Gmitter, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 236 (1990).Google Scholar
4. EerNisse, E. P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 30, 290 (1977).Google Scholar
5. Kobeda, E. and Irene, E. A., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B6, 574 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Tapfer, L. and Grambow, P., Appl. Phys. A. 50, 3 (1990).Google Scholar
7. Macrander, A. T. and Slusky, S. E. G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 443 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Shen, Q., Umbach, C. C., Weselak, B. and Blakely, J. M., Phys. Rev. B 48, 17967 (1993).Google Scholar
9. Shen, Q., Umbach, C. C., Weselak, B. and Blakely, J. M., submitted to Phys. Rev. B.Google Scholar
10. Tanaka, S., Umbach, C. C., Shen, Q. and Blakely, J. M., in Materials- Fabrication and Patterning at the Nanoscale edited by Cerrina, F., and Marrian, C. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 380, Pittsburgh, PA 1995) p. 6166. (In this paper, the oxide thickness was given as 11nm; we now believe the correct value to have been ∼6nm. This does not change any of the conclusions of this paper.)Google Scholar
11. Warren, B. E., X-ray Diffraction, Addison-Wesley, New York, 1969.Google Scholar
12. Fargeix, A. and Ghibaudo, G., J. Appl. Phys. 54, 7153 (1983).Google Scholar
13. Warwick, C. M., and Clyne, T. W., J. Mater. Sci. 26, 3817 (1991).Google Scholar
14. Petersen, K. E., Proceedings of the IEEE 70, 420 (1982).Google Scholar