Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:07:19.199Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strained Layer Epitaxy: A Microscopic Description of Stress Driven Surface Diffusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

I. Lefebvre ,
C. Priester ,
G. Allan  and
M. Lannoo
I. Lefebvre
Affiliation:
IEMN, Dept. ISEN, BP 69, 59652 Villeneuve d’Ascq Cedex, France
C. Priester
Affiliation:
IEMN, Dept. ISEN, BP 69, 59652 Villeneuve d’Ascq Cedex, France
G. Allan
Affiliation:
IEMN, Dept. ISEN, BP 69, 59652 Villeneuve d’Ascq Cedex, France
M. Lannoo
Affiliation:
IEMN, Dept. ISEN, BP 69, 59652 Villeneuve d’Ascq Cedex, France
Get access

Abstract

The origin of the crosshatched morphology very often observed, for instance in the case of InGaAs on GaAs, is studied theoretically. The calculations are performed on the basis of a microscopic valence force field model.The force on an adatom induced by a periodic array of widely spaced dislocations is first determined. This is found to be attractive, in agreement with a previous classical elasticity description. Total energies of ridges are then calculated showing increased stability due to the misfit dislocations. The importance of the surface tension for the shape of the ridges is discussed. The results are finally compared to experimental evidence.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 356: Symposium B2 – Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties V , 1994 , 51
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Fitzgerald, E.A., Xie, Y.H., Monroe, D., Silverman, P.J., Kuo, J.M., Kortran, A.R., Thiel, F.A. and Wir, E.E., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 10, 1807 (1992)Google Scholar
2 Yu Shiryev, S., Jensen, F. and Petersen, J.W., Appl. Phys. Lett., 64, 3305 (1994)Google Scholar
3 Gendry, M., Porte, L., Hollinger, G., Loubet, M., Miossi, C. and Pitaval, M., J. Appl. Phys., to be published.Google Scholar
4 Zhou, X.C., Jiang, J., Du, A.Y., Zhao, J.W., Mu, S.M., Peng, L.M. and Zhong, Z.T., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 312, 77 (1993)Google Scholar
5 Keating, P. N., Phys. Rev 145, 637 (1966)Google Scholar
6 Musgrave, M. J. P. and Pople, J.A., Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), A268, 464 (1962)Google Scholar
7 Payne, M.C. et al, Rev. Mod. Phys., 64, 1070 (1992)Google Scholar
8 Freund, L.B., Beltz, G.E. and Jonsdottir, F., Mat. Res. Sos. Symp. 1993 Google Scholar
9 Stoneham, A.M., Sol. State. Comm. 24, 425 (1977)Google Scholar
10 Lau, K.H. and Kohn, W., 65, 607 (1977)Google Scholar
11 Priester, C., Lefebvre, I., Allan, G. and Lannoo, M., ICPS 22 proc. Vancouver August 1994Google Scholar