Skip to main content

Stressing Lipid Membranes: Effects of Polymers on Membrane Structural Integrity

  • Jia-Yu Wang (a1), Chi-Yuan Cheng (a2), Ravinath. Kausik (a2) (a3), Jaemin Chin (a1), Songi. Han (a2), Jeremy D. Marks (a4) and Ka Yee C. Lee (a1)...

Disruption of cell membranes triggers rapid metabolic energy exhaustion, then acute cellular necrosis. Cell membrane dysfunction due to loss of structure integrity is the pathology of tissue death in trauma, muscular dystrophies, reperfusion injuries and common diseases. It is now established that certain PEG-based biocompatible polymers, such as Poloxamer 188, Poloxamine 1107 and PEG, are effective in sealing of injured cell membranes, and thus can prevent acute necrosis if delivered within a few hours after injury. Despite these broad applications of PEG-based polymers for human health, the fundamental mechanisms of how PEG-based polymers interact with cell membranes are still under debate. Here, the effects of PEG-based biocompatible polymers on phospholipid membrane integrity under external stimuli (osmotic stress and oxidative stress) were explored using giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) as model cell membranes. Through fluorescence leakage assays and time-lapse fluorescence microscopy, we directly observed that the surface-adsorbed P188 can efficiently inhibits the loss of structural integrity of giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) under hypo-osmotic stress. We propose that the adsorption of polymers on the membrane surface is responsible for the cell membrane resealing process, while the insertion of the hydrophobic portion of the polymers increases membrane permeability. To elucidate the mechanism by which hydrophilic polymers help restore membrane integrity while their hydrophobic counterparts disrupt it, 1H Overhauser Dynamic Nuclear Polarization (ODNP)-NMR spectroscopy, a newly developed NMR technique that provides unprecedented resolution for differentiating weak surface adsorption versus translocation of polymers to membranes, was employed to sensitively detect polymer-lipid membrane interactions through the modulation of local hydration dynamics in lipid membranes. Our study shows that P188—the most hydrophilic poloxamer known as a membrane sealant—weakly adsorbs onto the membrane surface, yet effectively retards membrane hydration dynamics. Contrarily, P181—the most hydrophobic poloxamer known as a membrane permeabilizer—initially penetrates past lipid headgroups and enhances intrabilayer water diffusivity. Consequently, our results illustrate that the relative hydrophilic/hydrophobic ratio of the polymer dictates its functions. These findings gleaned from local hydration dynamics are well supported by our thermodynamics and fluorescence data.

Corresponding author
Hide All
1. Chang, D. C., Reese, T. S., Biophys. J. 58, 1 (1990).
2. Steinhardt, R. A., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1066, 152 (2005).
3. Lee, R. C., Kolodney, M. S., Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 80, 672 (1987).
4. Shi, R., Luo, J., Peasley, M., Neoroscience 115, 337 (2002).
5. Mina, E. W., Lasagna-Reeves, C., Glabe, C. G., Kayed, R. J., Mol. Biol. 391, 577 (2009).
6. Yasuda, S., Townsend, D., Michele, D. E., Favre, E. G., Day, S. M., Metzger, J. M. D., Nature 436, 1025 (2005).
7. Greenebaum, B., Blossfield, K., Hannig, J., Carrillo, C. S., Beckett, M. A., Weichselbaum, R. R., Lee, R. C., Burns 30, 539 (2004).
8. Miller, D. W., Batrakova, E. V., Kabanov, A. V., Pharm. Res. 16, 396 (1999).
9. Wang, J.-Y., Cheng, C.-Y., Han, S., Marks, J. D., Lee, K. Y. C., Biomacromolecules, 13, 2616 (2012).
10. Cheng, C.-Y., Wang, J.-Y., Kausik, R., Lee, K. Y. C., Han, S., J. Magn. Reson. 215, 115 (2012).
11. Cheng, C.-Y., Wang, J.-Y., Kausik, R., Lee, K. Y. C., Han, S., Biomacromolecules, 13, 2624 (2012).
12. Wang, J.-Y., Chin, J., Marks, J. D., Lee, K. Y. C., Langmuir, 26, 12953 (2010).
13. Heerklotz, H., Seelig, J., Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1508, 69 (2000).
14. Gabriel, G. J., Pool, J. G., Som, A., Dabkowski, J. M., Coughlin, E. B., Muthukumar, M., Tew, G. N., Langmuir 24, 12480 (2008).
15. Wu, G., Lee, K. Y. C., J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 15522 (2009).
16. Arnold, K., Zschoernig, O., Barthel, D., Herold, W., Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1022, 303 (1990).
17. Evans, E., Deedham, D., Macromolecules 21, 1822 (1988).
18. Lehtonen, J. Y., Kinnumen, P. K., Biophys. J., 68, 525 (1995).
19. Heerklotz, H. H., Binder, H., Epand, R. M., Biophys. J. 76, 2606 (1999).
20. Olsher, M., Yoon, S.-I., Chong, P. L.-G., Biochemistry 44, 2080 (2005).
21. Faria, A., Calhau, C., Freitas, V. D., Mateus, N. J., Agrc. Food. Chem. 54, 2392 (2006).
22. Halliwell, B., Gutteridge, J. M. C., Methods in Enzymology, 186, 1 (Academic Press, 1990).
23. Zweier, J. L., Kuppusamy, P., Lutty, G. A., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 4046 (1988).
24. Borst, J. W., Visser, N. V., Kouptsova, O., Visser, A., J. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1487, 61 (2000).
25. Hannig, J., Zhang, D., Canaday, D. J., Beckett, M. A., Astumian, R. D., Weichselbaum, R. R., Lee, R. C., Radiat. Res 154, 171 (2000).
26. Frim, D. M., Wright, D. A., Curry, D. J., Cromie, W., Lee, R., Kang, U. J., Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology 15, 171 (2004).
27. Riske, K. A., Sudbrack, T. P., Archilha, N. L., Uchoa, A. F., Schroder, A. P., Marques, C. M., Baptista, M.S., Itri, R., Biophys. J. 97, 1362 (2009).
28. Borgens, R. B., Shi, R., Bohnert, D., J. exp. Bio. 205, 1 (2002).
29. Palmer, J. S., Cromie, W. J., Lee, R. C., J. urology 159, 2136 (1998).
30. Yin, H., Xu, L. N., Porter, A., Chem. Rev. 111, 5944 (2011).
31. Ball, P., Chem. Rev. 108, 74 (2008).
32. Armstrong, B. D., Han, S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 4641 (2009).
33. Zhang, L. Y., Yang, Y., Kao, Y. T., Wang, L. J., Zhong, D. P. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 10677 (2009).
34. Kausik, R., Han, S., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 7732 (2011).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL)
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 1946-4274
  • URL: /core/journals/mrs-online-proceedings-library-archive
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 2 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 58 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.