Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T07:25:52.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Study of the Consequences of Secondary Water Radiolysis within and Surrounding a Defective Canister

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Jinsong Liu ,
Bo Strömberg  and
Ivars Neretnieks
Jinsong Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Royal Institute of Technology, S-100 44, Stockholm, Sweden
Bo Strömberg
Affiliation:
Swedish Nuclear Inspectorate (SKI), S-106 58. Stockholm, Sweden
Ivars Neretnieks
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Royal Institute of Technology, S-100 44, Stockholm, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

A model has been developed to study the effects of secondary water radiolysis caused by dispersed radionuclides in a bentonite buffer surrounding a copper canister. The secondary radiolysis is the radiolysis caused by radionuclides that have been released from the spent fuel and are present either as solutes in the pore-water, as sorbed species on the surface of other minerals, or as secondary minerals. The canister is assumed to be initially defective with a hole of a few millimeters on its wall. The small hole will considerably restrict the transport of oxidants through the canister wall and the release of radionuclides to the outside of the canister. The dissolution of the spent fuel is assumed to be controlled by chemical kinetics at rates extrapolated from experimental studies. Two cases have been considered with the purpose to illustrate the behaviors of both conservative and non-conservative nuclides. The nuclides that are most relevant are those expected to be the dominant α-emitters in the long-term (e.g. 239Pu, 240Pu, 241Am). In the first case it is assumed that there is no precipitation of secondary minerals of the relevant radionuclides inside the canister. In the second case it is assumed that the radionuclide concentration within the canister is controlled by its respective solubility limit. The radionuclide released to the surrounding buffer is then predicted using a mass balance model. The modelling results show that in both cases, the spent fuel will not be oxidized at a rate significantly faster compared to the case where secondary radiolysis is completely neglected. In the first case, however, a large domain of the near-field can be oxidized due to a much faster depletion of reducing minerals in the buffer, compared to the case where secondary radiolysis is neglected. In the second case, the effects of the secondary water radiolysis will be quite limited.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 663: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste management XXIV , 2000 , 525
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Torstenfelt, B., Allard, B., Johnsson, W. and T. Ittner, (1983). Iron content and reducing capacity of granite and bentonite. SKBF/KBS TR 83-36.Google Scholar
2. Christensen, H. and Bjergbakke, E., (1982). Radiolysis of groundwater from HLW (high level waste) stored in copper canister. KBS Technical Report 82-02. Swedish Nuclear Fuel Supply Co/Division KBS, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
3. Liu, J. and Neretnieks, I., (1996). A model for radiation energy deposition in natural uranium-bearing systems and its consequences to water radiolysis. J. Nucl. Mater., 231, 103–112.Google Scholar
4. Neretnieks, I., (1997). Modelling oxidative dissolution of spent fuel. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 465, 573–580.Google Scholar
5.SKB 91, (1992). SKB 91. Final disposal of spent nuclear fuel. Importance of the bedrock for safety. SKB TR 92-20. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
6. Sunder, S., Shoesmith, D. W., Miller, N. H. and Wallace, G. J., (1992). Determination of criteria for selecting a UO2 fuel dissolution model for nuclear fuel waste management concept assessment. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 257, 345–352.Google Scholar
7. Bruno, J. Cera, E., Duro, L., Eriksen, T. E. and Werme, L. O., (1996). A kinetic model for the stability of spent fuel under oxic conditions. J. Nucl. Mater., 238, 110–120.Google Scholar
8. Arthur, R. and Apted, M., (1996). Radionuclide solubility for SITE- 94. SKI Report 96:30. Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
9. Johnson, L. H., Shoesmith, D. W. and Tait, J. C., (1994). Release of radionuclides from spent LWR UO2 and mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel. Internal Report 94-40, Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland.Google Scholar