Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T08:17:06.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Synthesis and Magnetic Characteristics of Granular Co Dispersions in a Polymer Matrix

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Eric Kay
Affiliation:
IBM Research Division, Almaden Research Center, San.Jose, CA 95120-6099
C. Laurent
Affiliation:
IBM Research Division, Almaden Research Center, San.Jose, CA 95120-6099
S.S.P. Parkin
Affiliation:
IBM Research Division, Almaden Research Center, San.Jose, CA 95120-6099
D. Mauri
Affiliation:
IBM Research Division, Almaden Research Center, San.Jose, CA 95120-6099
Get access

Abstract

We have produced thin film composite matrices containing granular transition metals in the zero valent state and have found onset of percolation at a much lower volume fraction than was the case for Au, albeit for significantly smaller transition metal particles. At volume fractions below percolation these granular composites are superparamagnetic down to 6°K. Remanent magnetization and hysteretic ferromagnetic behavior was not observed until we were slightly above the onset of electrical percolation. We interpret this result as indicative of ferromagnetic ordering among the transition metal grains. No significant reduction in magnetic moment due to size effects or to chemical interaction with the matrix was observed. A very small size dispersion of the metal clusters was indicated both from magnetic a well as electron microscopy measurements.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bean, C.P., Livinston, J.d., and Rodbell, D.S., J. Phys. Rad. 20, 298 (1956).Google Scholar
2. Illenberger, A. and Numez, L.J., Z. Phys. Chem. 23, 145 (1960).Google Scholar
3. Perrin, J., Despax, B., Hanchett, V., and Kay, E., Vac. Sc. Technol. A 4, 46 (1986).Google Scholar
4. Perrin, J., Despax, B., and Kay, E., Phys. Rev. B 32, 719, (1985).Google Scholar
5. Kay, E. and llecq, M. Vac. Sci. and Technol. A, 2, 401 (1984).Google Scholar
6. Nicklasson, G.A. and Granquist, C.G., J. Appl. Phys. 55, 3382 (1984).Google Scholar
7. Laurent, C. and Kay, F., J. Appl. Phys. 65, 1717 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Jortner, J. and Cohen, M.H., Phys. Rev. B 13, 1548 (1976).Google Scholar
9. Affinito, J., Fortier, N., and Parson, R.R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2, 316 (1984).Google Scholar
10. Morrish, A.H., The Physical Principles of Magnetism (Wiley, New York, 1965), p.362.Google Scholar
11. Gittleman, J.I., Goldstein, Y., and Bozowski, S., Phys. Rev. B. 5, 3609 (1972).Google Scholar
12. Liou, S.H. and Chien, C.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 512 (1988).Google Scholar
13. Paparazzo, E., Dormann, J.L., and Fiorani, D., Phys. Rev. B 28, 1154 (1983).Google Scholar