Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T12:47:31.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weighted-Density Theory of Phase Transitions in Fluids Composed of Anisotropic Particles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

J. F. Marko  and
W. A. Curtin
J. F. Marko
Affiliation:
The James Franck Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60615
W. A. Curtin
Affiliation:
BP Research, 4440 Warrensville Ctr. Rd., Cleveland, OH 44128
Get access

Abstract

A nonperturbative approach to the density-functional description of phase transitions in fluids composed of anisotropic particles is presented. The theory is exact to second order in functional perturbation theory, and at higher orders satisfies all sum rules derived from density derivatives of the two-point direct correlations. We have applied this theory to orientational and translational freezing of hard ellipsoids, and we find that the description of the structure of crystalline phases is improved in comparison to the commonly used second-order theory. For the case of orientational freezing, it is found that the higher-order contributions do not modify the predictions of the second-order theory, and that accurate liquid structure appears to be the key factor leading to improved description of the nematic phase.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 177: Symposium V – Macromolecular Liquids , 1989 , 329
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Ramakrishnan, T. V. and Yussouff, M., Phys Rev. B 19, 2775 (1979).Google Scholar
[2] Haymet, A. D. J., J. Chem. Phys. 78, 4641 (1983).Google Scholar
[3] Singh, U. P. and Singh, Y., Phys. Rev. A 33, 2725 (1986).Google Scholar
[4] Marko, J. F., Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 325 (1988). J. F. Marko, Phys. Rev. A, 39, 2050 (1989).Google Scholar
[5] Rick, S. W., Smithline, S. J. and Haymet, A. D. J., J. Chem. Phys. 88, 2004 (1988).Google Scholar
[6] Curtin, W. A. and Ashcroft, N. W., Phys. Rev. A 32, 2909 (1985), W. A. Curtin and N. W. Ashcroft, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2775 (1986). See also P. Tarazona, Phys. Rev. A 31, 2672 (1985).Google Scholar
[7] Denton, A. R. and Ashcroft, N. W., Phys. Rev. A 39, 4701 (1989).Google Scholar
[8] Curtin, W. A. and Runge, K., Phys. Rev. A 35, 4755 (1987).Google Scholar
[9] Mulder, B. M., Frenkel, D. and McTague, J. P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 287 (1984), B. M. Mulder and D. Frenkel, Mol. Phys. 55, 1193 (1985).Google Scholar
[10] Pynn, R., Solid State Commun. 14, 29 (1974). A. Wulf, J. Chem. Phys. 67, 2254 (1977).Google Scholar
[11] Perera, A., Kusalik, P. G., and Patey, G. N., J. Chem. Phys. 87, 1295 (1987).Google Scholar
[12] Marko, J. F., Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 543 (1989).Google Scholar
[13] Kielich, S., Dielectric and Related Molecular Processes, Chemical Society of London, London (1972), Vol. 1, Chapter 7.Google Scholar