Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T21:55:43.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

When Interface Gets Rough…

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

Toh-Ming Lu
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, Applied Physics, and Astronomy and Center for Integrated Electronics
Hong-Ning Yang
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, Applied Physics, and Astronomy Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180-3590, USA
Gwo-Ching Wang
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, Applied Physics, and Astronomy Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180-3590, USA
Get access

Abstract

Interface roughness is one of the central features in many important thin film technologies. Roughness is a result of far from equilibrium dynamic growth process and is difficult to describe using conventional statistical mechanics. Recently a dynamic scaling hypothesis has been proposed to describe such a system in which both time and space scaling are considered simultaneously. This approach has generated tremendous interest, both theoretical and experimental, for scientists working in thin film growth/etching as well as many diverse fields. In this paper we shall discuss the origin of the formation of interface roughness, the difference between near equilibrium and far from equilibrium growth problems, the relevant parameters that are necessary to describe a rough interface, and the application of the self-affine scaling concept in growth problems. The experimental approaches to study rough interfaces and growth fronts using diffraction will be summarized. It is shown that there exist two types of dynamic scaling during growth, one with a stationary local slope and another one with a nonstationary local slope. Future directions in this new area of research are highlighted.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bauer, E., Z. Kristallogr. 110, 372 (1958).Google Scholar
2. Kern, R., Lay, G. Le, and Metois, J.J., Basis Mechanisms in the Early Stages of Epitaxy, in Current Topis in Mat. Sci. 3, 131 (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1979).Google Scholar
3. Venables, J.A., Spiller, G.D.T., and Hanbichen, M., Rpt. Progr. Phys. 47, 399 (1984).Google Scholar
4. Family, F. and Vicsek, T., J. Phys. A18, L75 (1985).Google Scholar
5. For review, see Dynamics of Fractal Surfaces, edited by Family, F. and Vicsek, T. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1990).Google Scholar
6. Mitchell, M.W. and Bonnell, A., J. Mater. Res. 5, 2244 (1990).Google Scholar
7. Gómez-Rodríguez, J.M., Baró, A.M., and Salarezza, R.C., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B9, 495 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Williams, R.S., Bruinsma, R., and Rudnik, J., in Evoltion of Surface and Thin Film Microstructure, edited by Atwater, H.A., Grabow, M., Chason, E., and Lagally, M. G. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 280, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992); E. A. Eklund, R. Bruinsma, J. Rudnik, and R.S. Williams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1759 (1991).Google Scholar
9. Krim, J., Heyvaert, I., Haesendonck, C. Van, and Bruynseraede, Y., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 57 (1993).Google Scholar
10. Yang, H.-N., Chan, A., and Wang, G.-C., J. Appl. Phys. 74, 101 (1993).Google Scholar
11. You, H., Chiarello, R.P., Kim, H.K., and Vandervoort, K.G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2900 (1993).Google Scholar
12. Palasantzas, G. and Krim, J., Phys. Rev. Lett., in press.Google Scholar
13. Tong, W.M., Williams, R.S., Yanase, A., Segawa, Y., and Anderson, M.S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3374 (1994).Google Scholar
14. Pétri, R., Brault, P., Vatel, O., Henry, D., André, E., Dumas, P., and Salvan, F., J. Appl. Phys. 75, 7498 (1994).Google Scholar
15. Eaglesham, D.J., Gossmann, H.-J., and Cerullo, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1227 (1990); D.J. Eaglesham and G. H. Gilmer, in Surface disordering: Growth, roughening and phase transitions, edited by R. Jullien et al. (Nova, NY 1993).Google Scholar
16. For review, see Yang, H.-N., Wang, G.-C., and Lu, T.-M., Diffraction from Rough Surfaces and Growth Fronts (World Scientific, Singapore, 1993).Google Scholar
17. Yang, H.-N., Lu, T.-M., and Wang, G.-C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2612 (1992); Phys. Rev. B47, 3911 (1993).Google Scholar
18. Wong, Po-zen and Bray, Alan J., Phys. Rev. B37, 7751 (1988).Google Scholar
19. Sinha, S. K., Sirota, E. B., Garoff, S., and Stanley, H. B., Phys. Rev. B38, 2297 (1988).Google Scholar
20. Chiarello, R., Panella, V., Krim, J., and Thompson, C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3408 (1991).Google Scholar
21. He, Y.-L., Yang, H.-N., Lu, T.-M., and Wang, G.-C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3770 (1992).Google Scholar
22. Ernst, H.-J., Fabre, F., Folkerts, R., and Lapujoulade, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 112 (1994).Google Scholar
23. Thompson, C., Palasantzas, G., Feng, Y.P., Sinha, S.K., and Krim, J., Phys. Rev. B49, 4902 (1994).Google Scholar
24. Yang, H.-N., Wang, G.-C., and Lu, T.-M., Phys. Rev. B50, 7365 (1994).Google Scholar
25. Salditt, T., Metzger, T.H., and Peisl, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2228 (1994).Google Scholar
26. Yang, H.-N., G.-C.Wang, and Lu, T.-M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2348 (1994).Google Scholar
27. Zeng, H. and Vidali, G., Phys. Rev. Lett., in press.Google Scholar
28. Wolf, D.E. and Villain, J., Europhys. Lett. 13, 389 (1990).Google Scholar
29. Lai, Z.-W. and Sarma, S. Das, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2348 (1991).Google Scholar
30. Tang, L.-H. and Nattermann, T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2899 (1991).Google Scholar
31. Zangwill, A., Vvedensky, D.D., Luse, C.N., and Wilby, M.R., Surf. Sci. 274, L529 (1992); Phys. Rev. E48, 852 (1993).Google Scholar
32. Siegert, M. and Plischke, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2035 (1992).Google Scholar
33. Amar, J.G., Lain, P.-M., and Family, F., Phys. Rev. E47, 3242 (1993); J.G. Amar and F. Family, in Mechanisms of Thin Film Evolution, edited by S.M. Yalisove, C.V. Thompson, and D.J. Eaglesham (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 317, Pittsburgh, PA, 1994).Google Scholar
34. Mullins, W. W., J. Appl. Phys. 28, 334 (1957); 30, 77 (1959).Google Scholar