Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T00:10:19.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XPS and XRD Studies of Samples from the Natural Fission Reactors in the Oklo Uranium Deposits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

S. Sunder ,
N.H. Miller  and
A.M. Duclos
S. Sunder
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada. ROE 1LO.
N.H. Miller
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada. ROE 1LO.
A.M. Duclos
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada. ROE 1LO.
Get access

Abstract

Mineral samples from the natural fission reactors 10 and 13 in the Oklo uranium deposits were studied using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) to gain information about the long-term behaviour of UO2 fuel in a geological disposal vault. Two samples from reactor zone 10 (samples # D81N-190292 and D73-88) and one sample from reactor zone 13 (sample # SD37-S2/CD) were analysed. Low-resolution XPS spectra were recorded to determine the major elements present in the ore. High-resolution spectra were recorded to gain information about the chemical state of the elements present in the mineral samples. The samples show low values for the U6+/U4+ ratio. The oxidation state of uranium in these samples is even lower than that in U409. The binding energies of the Pb 4f bands indicate most of the Pb is in the +2 oxidation state in these samples. The C Is band indicates the presence of organic carbon. XRD analysis shows that the main uranium-bearing phase is uraninite and lead is present mainly as galena. The significance of the results for nuclear fuel waste management is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 333: Symposium V – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVII , 1993 , 631
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Cramer, J.J., Natural analog studies on the Cigar Lake uranium deposit: an update, in CEC Natural analogue working group. Côme, B. and Chapman, N.A. (Eds.). CEC Report EUR 11725 EN, 50 (1989).Google Scholar
2 Sunder, S., Taylor, P. and Cramer, J.J., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI, Apted, M.J. and Westerman, R.E. (Eds.), Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 112, pp. 465–472 (1988).Google Scholar
3 Sunder, S., Cramer, J.J. and Miller, N.H., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, XV, Sombret, C.G. (Ed.). Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 257. pp. 449–457 (1992).Google Scholar
4 Finch, R.J. and Ewing, R.C., J. Nucl. Mater. 190, 133 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Janeczek, J. and Ewing, R.C., J. Nucl. Mater. 190, 157 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 IAEA, The Oklo Phenomenon. Proceedings of a Symposium. Libreville (1975).Google Scholar
7 IAEA, Natural Fission Reactions. Proceedings of a Technical Committee Meeting. Paris (1978).Google Scholar
8 Blanc, P.L., Escalier des Orres, P.. Gauthier-Lafave, F., Ledoux, E., Menager, M.T. and Soubevran, R.. An AECL Research Translation of a CEA Report. The New Oklo Reaction Zones (Gabon): Report on Mission (July 1988) and Study Project on the Long-Term Migration Processes of Elements Within a Deep Geochemical System. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Technical Record, TR-553, (1992).Google Scholar
9 Holliger, P., An AECL Research Translation of a CEA Report. The New Oklo Reaction Zones: U-Pb Dating and In Situ Characterization of Fission Products by Ion Analysis. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Technical Record, TR-614 (1993).Google Scholar
10 Holliger, P. (private communication).Google Scholar
11 Wagner, C.D., Riggs, W.M., Davis, L.E., Moulder, J.F. and Muilenberg, G.E., Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Perkin-Elmer Corporation Physical Electronics Division, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, U.S.A. (1979).Google Scholar
12 Mclntyre, N.S., Sunder, S., Shoesmith, D.W. and Stanchell, F.W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 18, 714 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Hoekstra, H.R., Santoro, A. and Siegel, S., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 18, 166 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Cohen, I. and Berman, R.M., J. Nucl. Mater. 18, 77 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 JCPDS Structure File # 5-0592; from Swanson and Fuyat, NBS Circular 539, Vol.II, 18 (1953).Google Scholar
16 Sunder, S. (unpublished work).Google Scholar
17 Sunder, S. and Shoesmith, D.W., Chemistry of U02 Fuel Dissolution in Relation to the Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-10395 (1991).Google Scholar
18 Sunder, S., Shoesmith, D.W., Miller, N.H. and Wallace, G.J., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, XV, Sombret, C.G. (Ed.), Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 257, pp. 345–352 (1992).Google Scholar
19 Duffy, C.J. in Reference 7, pp. 229-234. IAEA-TC-119/36 (1978).Google Scholar
20 Toulhoat, P., Gallien, J.P. and LΉénoret, P., Far Field Hydrogeochemistry in the Oklo Reactor Area (Gabon), in Proc. 2nd Joint CEC-CEA Progress Meeting, Brussels, April 6-7, 1992. Commission of the European Communities Publ., EUR 14877 EN, pp. 85-104 (1992).Google Scholar