Skip to main content
×
×
Home

X-Ray Photoelectron and Auger Electron Forward-Scattering Studies of the Epitaxial Growth of Fe on Ag(100).

  • William F. Egelhoff (a1)
Abstract

A controversy has arisen in the past year over whether or not the growth of Fe on Ag(100) at room temperature occurs by a layer-by-layer mechanism. The present work attempts to address this controversy with an investigation of the issues, primarily by x-ray photoelectron (XPS) and Auger electron forward scattering, but with important supporting data from low-energy electron diffraction (LEED), and reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED) oscillations. The results of this work suggest that the origin of the controversy lies in different substrate preparation techniques which produce different atomic step densities on the Ag(100) surface. The step sites are implicated as being the initiators of major departures from a layer-by-layer growth mode whenever most of the deposited Fe atoms have sufficient mobility to reach these steps. However, even when the Fe atoms cannot reach these steps it appears that atomic place-exchange occurs with ≥25% of the top-layer Ag atoms. Atomic place-exchange mechanisms, which could account for this intermixing, have been observed in recent molecular-dynamics simulations of epitakial growth. Thus it seems probable that under the conditions that appear to produce layer-by-layer growth, the growth begins as layer-by-layer growth of an FeAg alloy, and only becomes layer-by-layer in pure Fe as the segregating Ag atoms gradually get left behind in the growing Fe film.

Copyright
References
Hide All
[1] Smith, G.C., Padmore, G.A., and Norris, C., Surface Sci. 119, L287 (1982).
[2] Richter, R., Gay, J.G., and Smith, J.R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A3, 1498 (1984).
[3] Fu, C.L., Freeman, A.J., and Oguchi, T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2700 (1985).
[4] Richter, R., Gay, J.G., and Smith, J.R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2704 (1985).
[5] Jonker, B.T., Walker, K.-H., Kisker, E., Prinz, G.A., and Carbone, C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 142 (1986).
[6] Jonker, B.T. and Prinz, G.A., Surface Sci. 172, L568 (1986).
[7] Heinrich, B., Urquhart, K.B., Arrott, A.S., Cochran, J.F., Myrtle, K., and Purcell, S.T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1756 (1987).
[8] Jonker, B.T., Prinz, G.A., Kisker, E., Walker, K.-H., and Carbone, C., J. Appl. Phys. 61, 3366 (1987).
[9] Gay, J.G. and Richter, R., J. Appl. Phys. 61, 3362 (1987). 39
[10] Koon, N.C., Jonker, B.T., Volkening, F.A., Krebs, J.J., and Prinz, G.A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59. 2463 (1987).
[11] Stampanoni, M., Vaterlaus, A., Aeschlimann, M., and Meier, F., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59. 2483 (1987).
[12] Urquhart, K.B., Heinrich, B., Cochran, J.F., Arrott, A.S., and Myrtle, K., J. Appl Phys. 64, 5334 (1988).
[13] Heinrich, B., Urquhart, K.B., Dutcher, J.R., Purcell, S.T., Cochran, J.F., Arrott, A.S., Steigerwald, D.A., and Egelhoff, W.F. Jr., J. Appl. Phys. 63, 3863 (1988).
[14] Vaterlaus, A., Stampanoni, M., Aeschlimann, M., and Meier, F., J. Appl. Phys. 64, 5331 (1988).
[15] Robins, J.L., Celotta, R.J., Unguris, J., and Pierce, D.T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 1918 (1988).
[16] Schneider, C. M., de Miguel, J.J., Bressler, P., Garbe, J., Ferrer, S., Miranda, R., and Kirschner, J., J. Phys. Colloq. (Paris) 49, C81657 (1988).
[17] Heinrich, B., Purcell, S.T., Dutcher, J.R., Urquhart, K.B., Cochran, J.F., and Arrott, A.S., Phys. Rev. B 38, 12879 (1988).
[18] Heinrich, B., Cochran, J.F., Arrott, A.S., Urquhart, K.B., Myrtle, K., Celinski, Z., and Zhong, Q.-M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 151, 177 (1989).
[19] Rau, C., Appl. Phys. A 49, 579 (1989).
[20] Egelhoff, W.F. Jr. and Jacob, I., Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 921 (1989).
[21] Krebs, J.J., Jonker, B.T., and Prinz, G.A., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 151, 23 (1989).
[22] Ballentine, C.A., Fink, R.L., Araya-Pochet, J., and Erskine, J.L., Appl. Phys. A 49, 459 (1989).
[23] Stampanoni, M., Appl. Phys. A49, 449 (1989).
[24] Heinrich, B., Cochran, J.F., Arrott, A.S., Purcell, S.T., Urquhart, K.B., Dutcher, J.R., and Egelhoff, W.F. Jr., Appl. Phys. A 49, 473 (1989).
[25] Li, H. and Tonner, B.P., Phys. Rev. B 40, 10241 (1989).
[26] Krebs, J.J., Appl. Phys. A 49, 513 (1989).
[27] Purcell, S.T., Ph. D. Thesis, Simon Fraser Univ., 1989.
[28] Urquhart, K.B., Ph. D. Thesis, Simon Fraser Univ., 1989.
[29] Myrtle, K., Ph. D. Thesis, Simon Fraser Univ., 1989.
[30] Bland, J.A.C., Johnson, A.D., Norris, C., and Lauter, H.J., J. Appl. Phys. 67, 5397 (1990).
[31] Etienne, P., Lequien, S., Nguyen-Van-Dau, F., Cabanel, R., Creuzet, G., Friederich, A., Massies, J., Fert, A., Barthélémy, A., and Petroff, F., J. Appl. Phys. 67, 5400 (1990).
[32] Cabanel, R., Etienne, P., Lequien, S., Creuzet, G., Barthélémy, A., and Fert, A., J. Appl. Phys. 67, 5409 (1990).
[33] Gutierrez, C.J., Qiu, Z.Q., Wieczorek, M.D., and Walker, J.C., J. Appl. Phys. 67, 5415 (1990).
[34] Li, C., Freeman, A.J., Jansen, H.J.F., and Fu, C.L., Phys. Rev. B42, 5433 (1990).
[35] Rau, C., Jin, C., and Xing, G., Phys. Lett. A144, 406 (1990).
[36a] Li, H., Li, Y.S., Quinn, J., Tian, D., Sololov, J., Jona, F., and Marcus, P.M., Phys. Rev. B42, 9195 (1990).
[36b] Heinrich, B. and Arrott, A.S., to be published.
[37] Fadley, C.S., Phys. Scr. T17, 39 (1987).
[38] Egelhoff, W.F. Jr., CRC Crit. Rev. Sol. St. & Mat. Sci. 16, 213 (1990).
[39] Chambers, S.A., Adv. Phys, in press, 1991.
[40] Egelhoff, W.F. Jr., Jacob, I., Rudd, J.M., Cochran, J.F., and Heinrich, B., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A8, 1582 (1990).
[41] Egelhoff, W.F. Jr. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 37, 443 (1985).
[42] Egelhoff, W.F. Jr. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 83, 189 (1987).
[43] Steigerwald, D.A., Jacob, I., and Egelhoff, W.F. Jr., Surface Sci. 202, 472 (1988).
[44] Steigerwald, D.A. and Egelhoff, W.F. Jr., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A7, 3123 (1989)
[45] Smith, J.R. and Banerjea, A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2451 (1987).
[46] There being no experimental values available, the Fe/Ag(100) interfacial free energy is best estimated by recognizing that at the interface each Fe atom has 4 Fe and 4 Ag nearest neighbors and each Ag atom 4 Fe and 8 Ag nearest neighbors. The interfacial free energy is then estimated by averaging the heat of formation of FeAg and FeAg2 alloys, with these values being taken from: deBoer, F.R., Boom, R., Mattens, W.C.M., Miedema, A.R., Niessen, A.K., Cohesion in Metals, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988, p. 224.
[47] Bader, S.D. and Moog, E.R., J. Appl. Phys. 61, 3729 (1987).
[48] Schmitz, P.J., Leung, W.-Y., Graham, G.W., and Theil, P.A., Phys. Rev. B40, 11477 (1989).
[49] Tobin, J.G., Hansen, J.C., and Wagner, M.K., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A8, 2494 (1990).
[50] Tobin, J.G., Wagner, M.K., Guo, X.-Q., and Tong, S.Y., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc., in press, 1991.
[51] Calculated using phase shifts from Fink, M. and Ingram, J., Atomic Data 4, 1 (1972). Note that the wave backscattered by the Ag atom will forward scatter on its way through the Fe atom and pick up a small phase shift which will slightly modify the energies, quoted above, at which constructive and destructive interferences occur.
[52] Raeker, T.J., Sanders, D.E., and DePristo, A.E., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A8, 3531 (1990).
[53] Feibelman, P.J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 729 (1990).
[54] Chen, C. and Tsong, T.T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 3147 (1990).
[55] Kellogg, G.L. and Feibelman, P.J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 3143 (1990).
[56] Wrigley, J.D. and Ehrlich, G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 661 (1980); See also, related work in: D.W. Bassett and P.R. Webber, Surface Sci. 70, 520 (1978).
[57] Lutke, D. and Landman, U., to be published.
[58] See pp. 298 and 462 in deBoer, op. cit., Ref. 46.
[59] See, for example, Jaklevic, R.C. and Elie, L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 120 (1988).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL)
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 1946-4274
  • URL: /core/journals/mrs-online-proceedings-library-archive
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed