Abbott-Chapman, J., Eastehope, G. and O'Connor, P. (1995), ‘Subject choice in schools as a surrogate measure of ability’, Curriculum and Teaching, 10(2), pp. 57–68. doi:10.7459/ct/10.2.06.
Alcott, B. (2017), ‘Does teacher encouragement influence students' educational progress? A propensity-score matching analysis’, Research in Higher Education, 58(7), pp. 773–804. doi:10.1007/s11162-017-9446-2.
Anders, J. (2012), ‘Using the Longitudinal Study of Young People in England (LSYPE)/“Next Steps” for research into higher education access’, DoQSS Working Paper 12–13, Institute of Education, University of London.
Bell, J.F. (2001), ‘Patterns of subject uptake and examination entry 1984–1997’, Educational Studies, 27(2), pp. 201–19. doi:10.1080/03055690120050428.
Bia, M. and Mattei, A. (2008), ‘A stata package for the estimation of the dose-response function through adjustment for the generalized propensity score’, The Stata Journal, 8(3), pp. 354–73.
Black, D. and Smith, J. (2004), ‘How robust is the evidence on the effects of college quality? Evidence from matching’, Journal of Econometrics, 121. 1, pp. 99–124. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.006.
Borghans, L., Golsteyn, B.H.H. and Stenberg, A. (2013), ‘Does expert advice improve educational choice?’, IZA Discussion Paper IZA DO No. 7649, Institute for the Study of Labor.
Breen, R. and Yaish, M. (2006), ‘Testing the Breen-Goldthorpe Model of Educational Decision-Making’, in Morgan, S.L., Grusky, D.B. and Fields, G.S. (eds), Mobility and Inequality: Frontiers of Research from Sociology and Economics, Stanford University Press, pp. 232–58.
Chevalier, A. (2004), ‘Parental education and childs education: a natural experiment’, CEE Discussion Paper CEE DP 40, Centre for the Economics of Education, London School of Economics and Political Science.
Codiroli, N. (2015), ‘Inequalities in students' choice of stem subjects’, CLS Working Paper 2015/6, Centre for Longitudinal Studies, UCL Institute of Education.
Davies, P., Telhaj, S., Hutton, D., Adnett, N. and Coe, R. (2008), ‘Socioeconomic background, gender and subject choice in secondary schooling’, Educational Research, 50(3), pp. 235–48. doi:10.1080/00131880802309358.
De Philippis, M. (2017), ‘STEM graduates and secondary school curriculum: does early exposure to science matter?’, Working Paper 1107, Banca D'Italia.
Dilnot, C. (2016), ‘How does the choice of a-level subjects vary with students' socio-economic status in English state schools?’, British Educational Research Journal, 42(6), pp. 1081–106. doi:10.1002/berj.3250.
Dolton, P.J. and Vignoles, A. (2002), ‘Is a broader curriculum better?’, Economics of Education Review, 21(5), pp. 415–29. doi:10.1016/S0272-7757(01)00046-2
Duquet, N., Glorieux, I., Laurijssen, I. and Van Dorsselaer, Y. (2010), ‘An unfinished job? the effect of subject choice and family formation processes on labour market outcomes of young men and women’, Journal of Education and Work, 23(4), pp. 319–38. doi:10.1080/13639080.2010.484800.
Ermisch, J. and Pronzato, C. (2010), ‘Causal effects of parents' education on children's education’, ISER Working Paper 2010–16, Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Essex.
Francis, B. (2000), ‘The gendered subject: students' subject preferences and discussions of gender and subject ability’, Oxford Review of Education, 26(1), pp. 35–48. doi:10.1080/030549800103845.
Gibb, N. (2011), Speech by Nick Gibb to the Specialist Schools and Academies Trust.
Goldthorpe, J.H. and McKnight, A. (2004), ‘The economic basis of social class’, CASE paper 80, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics.
Hauser, R.M. (1994), ‘Measuring socioeconomic status in studies of child development’, Child Development, 65(6), pp. 1541–5. doi:10.2307/1131279.
Havari, E. and Savegnago, M. (2014), ‘The causal effect of parents' schooling on children's schooling in Europe. A new iv approach’, CEIS Tor Vergata Research Paper Vol. 12, Issue 5, No. 315, Cenre for Economic and International Studies Tor Vergata.
Henderson, M., Sullivan, A. and Anders, J. (2016), ‘Social class, gender and ethnic differences in subjects taken at age 14’, CLS Working Paper, Centre for Longitudinal Studies, UCL Institute of Education.
Hirano, K. and Imbens, G.M. (2005), ‘The propensity score with continuous treatments’, in Gelman, A. and Meng, X.-L. (eds), Applied Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference from Incomplete-Data Perspectives: An Essential Journey with Donald Rubin's Statistical Family, chapter 7, pp. 73–84, Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
Hodgson, A. and Spours, K. (2008), 14–19 Education and Training: Curriculum, Qualifications and Organisation, Sage.
Hoxby, C. and Turner, S. (2013), ‘Expanding college opportunities for high-achieving, low income students’, SIEPR Discussion Paper 12–014, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Stanford University.
Iannelli, C. (2013), ‘The role of the school curriculum in social mobility’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(5–6), pp. 907–28. doi:10.1080/01425692.2013.816031.
Imbens, G.M. and Rubin, D.B. (2015), Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jenkins, S.P. and Schluter, C. (2002), ‘The effect of family income during childhood on later-life attainment: evidence from Germany’, IZA Discussion Paper 604, Institute for the Study of Labor.
Jin, W., Muriel, A. and Sibieta, L. (2011), ‘Subject and course choices at ages 14 and 16 amongst young people in England: insights from behavioural economics’, DfE Research Report DFERR160, Department for Education.
McDool, E. (2017), ‘Neighbourhood effects on educational attainment: does family background influence the relationship?’, SERPS 2017002, The University of Sheffield Department of Economics.
Mendolia, S. and Walker, I. (2014), ‘The effect of personality traits on subject choice and performance in high school: evidence from an English cohort’, IZA Discussion Paper 8269, Institute for the Study of Labor.
Noden, P., Shiner, M. and Modood, T. (2014), ‘University offer rates for candidates from different ethnic categories’, Oxford Review of Education, 40(3), pp. 349–69. doi:10.1080/03054985.2014.911724.
Rose, D. and Pevalin, D.J. (2001), ‘The National Statistics Socioeconomic Classification: unifying official and sociological approaches to the conceptualisation and measurement of social class’, ISER Working Paper 2001–4, Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex.
Rosenbaum, P.R. and Rubin, D.B. (1983), ‘The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects’, Biometrika, 70(1), pp. 41–55. doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41.
Shadish, W.R. (2012), ‘Propensity score analysis: promise, reality and irrational exuberance’, Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9(2), pp. 129–44. doi:10.1007/s11292-012-9166-8.
Sullivan, A., Zimdars, A. and Heath, A. (2010), ‘The social structure of the 14–16 curriculum in England’, International Studies in Sociology of Education, 20(1), pp. 5–21. doi:10.1080/09620211003655572.
Tripney, J., Newman, M., Bangpan, M., Niza, C., MacKintosh, M. and Sinclair, J. (2010), Subject Choice in STEM: Factors Influencing Young People (aged 14–19) in Education. A systematic review of the UK literature, Wellcome Trust Report, EPPI Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
Vidal Rodeiro, C.L. (2009), ‘Some issues on the uptake of modern foreign languages at GCSE’, Statistica Report Series 10, Cambridge Assessment.