Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T03:11:07.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Segmental Volatility in Ethnically Divided Societies: (Re)assessing Party System Stability in Southeast Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2021

Damir Kapidžić*
Affiliation:
University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Olivera Komar
Affiliation:
University of Montenegro, Montenegro
*
*Corresponding author. Email: damir.kapidzic@fpn.unsa.ba

Abstract

This article examines the role of ethnicity and ethnic parties as stabilizing factors in Southeast European party systems. It compares two ethnically divided countries in Southeast Europe: Bosnia and Herzegovina, where ethnic identities that form the political cleavage are firm, and Montenegro, where they are malleable. Theoretically, it addresses the debate between scholars who either find stability or instability in East European post-communist party systems. The article traces the role of ethnicity in the formation and development of electoral contests and compares the two cases by utilizing measures of block volatility, based on analysis of official electoral data. We argue that party systems in ethnically diverse countries are stable at the subsystems level, but unstable within them. In BiH, firm ethnic identity stabilizes the party system by limiting competition between blocks, leading to closure. Malleable ethnic identity in Montenegro opens competition to non-ethnic parties seeking to bridge ethnic divisions, leading to more instability. We find that party system dynamics in ethnically divided new democracies depend on identity rigidity and cleavage salience, in addition to levels of heterogeneity.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Association for the Study of Nationalities

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abazović, Dino. 2010. “Rethinking Ethnicity, Religion and Politics: The Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina.” European Yearbook of Minority Issues Online 7 (1): 317326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anđelić, Neven. 2018. “Elections in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Discrimination and the Non-Vote.” Contemporary Southeastern Europe 5 (1): 2534.Google Scholar
Bartolini, Stefano, and Mair, Peter. 1990. Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability: Stabilisation of European Electorates 1885-1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bieber, Florian. 2006. Post-War Bosnia: Ethnicity, Inequality and Public Sector Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bielasiak, Jack. 2002. “The Institutionalization of Electoral and Party Systems in Postcommunist States.” Comparative Politics 34 (2): 189210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnir, Johanna. 2007. Ethnicity and Electoral Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bornschier, Simon. 2009. “Cleavage Politics in Old and New Democracies.” Living Reviews in Democracy 1 (1): 113.Google Scholar
Casal Bértoa, Fernando. 2014. “Party Systems and Cleavage Structures Revisited: A Sociological Explanation of Party System Institutionalization in East Central Europe.” Party Politics 20 (1), 1636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bértoa, Casal, Fernando, Kevin Deegan-Krause, and Haughton, Tim. 2017. “The Volatility of Volatility: Measuring Change in Party Vote Shares.” Electoral Studies 50: 142156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan. 2005. “Ethnic Parties and Democratic Stability.” Perspectives on Politics, 3 (2): 235252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan. 2011. “What is an Ethnic Party?Party Politics 17 (2): 151169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan, ed. 2012. Constructivist Theories of Ethnic Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corstange, Daniel. 2018. “Clientelism in Competitive and Uncompetitive Elections.” Comparative Political Studies 51 (1): 76104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crabtree, Charles and Golder, Matt. 2016. “Party System Volatility in Post-Communist Europe.” British Journal of Political Science 47 (1): 229–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deegan-Krause, Kevin. 2007. “New Dimensions of Political Cleavage.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, edited by Dalton, Russel and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter 538557. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dzankic, Jelena. 2013. “Cutting the Mist of the Black Mountain: Cleavages in Montenegro’s Divide over Statehood and Identity.” Nationalities Papers 41 (3): 412430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Election Data Bosnia and Herzegovina . 2018. Central Election Commission of BiH. https://www.izbori.ba. (Accessed November 14, 2018.)Google Scholar
Election Data Montenegro . 2020. Montenegro State Election Commission. http://dik.co.me/. (Accessed January 31, 2020.)Google Scholar
Election Law of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Unofficial consolidated text) . 2018. Central Electoral Commission of Bosnia and Herzegovina. https://www.izbori.ba/Documents/documents/ZAKONI/BiH_Election_Law_last_consolidated_version_2018.pdf. (Accessed June 6, 2018.)Google Scholar
Enyedi, Zsolt. 2005. “The Role of Agency in Cleavage Formation.European Journal of Political Research 44 (5): 697720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enyedi, Zsolt, and Bértoa, Fernando Casal. 2018. “Institutionalization and De-institutionalization in Post-Communist Party Systems.” East European Politics and Societies and Cultures 32 (3): 422450.10.1177/0888325417736808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federer-Shtayer, Hila, and Meffert, Michael. 2014. “The Block-Weighted Cleavage Salience Index.” Party Politics 20 (3): 324329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gherghina, Sergiu. 2014. Party Organization and Electoral Volatility in Central and Eastern Europe. Enhancing Voter Loyalty. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Henry. 2008. The Foundations of Ethnic Politics: Separatism of States and Nations in Eurasia and the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hulsey, John. 2015. “Party Politics in Bosnia and Herzegovina.” In State-Building and Democratization in Bosnia and Herzegovina, edited by Keil, Soeren and Perry, Valery 4160. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jenne, Erin, and Bieber, Florian. 2014. “Situational Nationalism: Nation-building in the Balkans, Subversive Institutions and the Montenegrin Paradox.” Ethnopolitics 13 (5): 431460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapidžić, Damir. 2015. “Democratic Transition and Electoral Design in Plural Societies: The Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s 1990 Elections.” Ethnopolitics 14 (3): 311327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapidžić, Damir. 2017. “Segmentirani stranački sustav Bosne i Hercegovine.” Političke perspektive 7 (1–2): 723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 2007. “Party Systems.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by Boix, Carles and Stokes, Susan 522554. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, Mansfeldova, Zdenka, Markowski, Radoslaw, and Tóka, Gábor. 1999. Post-Communist Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komar, Olivera. 2013. Birači u Crnoj Gori: Faktori partijske i izborne motivacije. Beograd: Udruženje za političke nauke Srbija.Google Scholar
Komar, Olivera, and Živković, Slaven. 2016. “Montenegro: A Democracy without Alternations.” East European Politics and Societies 30 (4): 785804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Peter. 1997. Party System Change. Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Manning, Carrie. 2004. “Elections and Political Change in Post-war Bosnia and Herzegovina.” Democratization 11 (2): 6086.10.1080/13510340412331294212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, Kenneth. 2009. Montenegro: A Modern History. New York. Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piacentini, Arianna. 2019. “Trying to Fit In”: Multiethnic Parties, Ethno-Clientelism, and Power-Sharing in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Macedonia.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 25 (3): 273291 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popis 2013 BiH . 2016. Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina. https://popis.gov.ba. (Accessed January 31, 2020.)Google Scholar
Population Census . 2020. Statistical Office of Montenegro. https://www.monstat.org/eng/page.php?id=56&pageid=56. (Accessed January 31, 2020.)Google Scholar
Posner, Daniel N. 2004. “The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas Are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi.” American Political Science Review 98 (4): 529545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Eleanor Neff, and Tucker, Joshua. 2014. “Revisiting Electoral Volatility in Post-Communist Countries: New Data, New Results and New Approaches.” British Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 123–47.10.1017/S0007123412000531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 2005. Parties and Party Systems. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Sikk, Allan. 2005. “How Unstable? Volatility and the Genuinely New Parties in Eastern Europe.European Journal of Political Research 44 (3): 391412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorlakson, Lori. 2018. “Introduction to Special Section, ‘Parties and Party System Development in Post-communist Europe.’East European Politics and Societies 32 (3): 411421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuković, Ivan. 2015. “Political Dynamics of Post-communist Montenegro: One Party Show.” Democratization 22 (1): 7391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, Andreas. 2008. “Elementary Strategies of Ethnic Boundary Making.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 31 (6): 10251055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Stefan. 2006. Ethnic Conflict: A Global Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zakon o izboru odbornika i poslanika (prečišćeni tekst) [Law on the Election of Councilors and Deputies (consolidated text)]. Službeni list Crne Gore 010/18. http://dik.co.me/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Zakon-o-izboru-odbornika-i-poslanika.pdf (Accessed June 6, 2018.)Google Scholar
Zuber, Christina Isabel. 2012. “Ethnic Party Competition Beyond the Segmented Market.” Nationalist Papers 40 (6): 927944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar