No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Modernization as Westernization? The geopolitical consequences of ethno-nationalism analyzed through Russian Art
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2018
Abstract
This paper argues that ethno-nationalist models of state organization encourage and strengthen sectarianism by accentuating differences between respective majority populations and those with non-majority characteristics as problematic, and identifies and explains the impacts of this for intra-state security in the West and for building partnerships with non-Western populations, citing negative implications on how we understand political behavior and for influence in military operations. The paper uses nineteenth-century Russian identity as a case study, considers the conflation between modernization and Westernization occuring at the time and uses Russian Art of the period as an analytical tool to uncover nuances that are relevant to debates concerning security, identity, and political behavior.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2013 Association for the Study of Nationalities
References
Agnew, John. 1994. “The Territorial Trap: The Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory.” Review of International Political Economy
1 (1): 53–78.Google Scholar
Bassin, Mark. 1991. “Russia Between Europe and Asia: The Ideological Construction of Geographical Space.” Slavic Review
50 (1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Bittner, Vanessa (tr).
1994. Masterpieces of the Tretyakov Gallery. Moscow: State Tretyakov Gallery.Google Scholar
Brugger, Bill, and Hannan, Kate. 1983. Modernisation and Revolution. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Christoff, Peter K.
1961. An Introduction to Nineteenth Century Russian Slavophilism: A Study in Ideas: A.S Xomjakov Vol. 1. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Delacroix, Jacques, and Ragin, Charles. 1978. “Modernizing Institutions, Mobilization, and Third World Development: A Cross-National Study.” The American Journal of Sociology
84 (1): 123–150.Google Scholar
Dixon, Simon M.
1999. The Modernisation of Russia, 1676-1825. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dodds, Klaus. 2001. “Political Geography III: Critical Geopolitics After Ten Years.” Progress in Human Geography
25 (3): 469–484.Google Scholar
Dodds, Klaus, and Atkinson, David, eds. 2000. Geopolitical Traditions: A Century of Geopolitical Thought. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Edie, James M., Scanlan, M. P., and Zeldin, Mary-Barbara, eds. 1965. Russian Philosophy Vol 1: The Beginnings of Russian Philosophy: The Slavophiles; The Westernizers. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.Google Scholar
Ely, Christopher. 2002. This Meager Nature: Landscape and National Identity in Imperial Russia. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Gleason, Abbott. 1972. European and Muscovite, Ivan Kireevsky and the Origins of Slavophilism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Camilla. 1962. The Great Experiment: Russian Art 1863-1922. Norwich: Jarrold and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Hare, Richard. 1965. The Art and Artists of Russia. Rochester: W. & J. Mackay & Co Ltd.Google Scholar
Hosking, Geoffrey A.
2002. Russia and the Russians: From Earliest Times to 2001. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Inkeles, Alex, and Smith, David H.
1974. Becoming Modern: Individual Change in Six Devel-Oping Countries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Martin W., and Wigen, Karen E.
1997. The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Loukomski, George. 1945. History of Modern Russian Painting 1840-1940. London: Hutchinson & CO.Google Scholar
Marshallsay, Zai, and Vadura, Katharine. 2006. Cultural Adaptation and Religious Maintenance Among Muslims in South Australia. Adelaide: Pilot report unpublished.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver V.
1999. Uses of the other: ‘the East’ in European Identity Formation. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
O'Tuathail, Gearoid. 1992. “Putting Mackinder in his Place: Material Transformations and Myth.” Political Geography
11 (1): 100–118.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro. 1973. “The Factorial Structure of Modernity: Empirical Replications and a Critique.” American Journal of Sociology
79 (1): 15–44.Google Scholar
Pratt, Mary L.
2008. Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reischauer, Edwin O.
1983. “Not Westernization But Modernization.” Japan Examined: Perspectives on Modern Japanese History, edited by Wray, Harry and Conroy, Hilary, 369–411. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Riasanovsky, Nicholas. 1952. Russia and the West in the Teaching of the Slavophiles: A Study of Romantic Ideology. Gloucester, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sardar, Ziaudding. 1999. “Development and the Locations of Eurocentrism.” In Critical Development Theory: Contributions to a New Paradigm, edited by Munck, Ronald and O'Hearn, Dennis, 44–63. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Shah, Tabish. May
2010. “Securitized Identities and Less Secure Western Multi-ethnic States: A Critical Geopolitics of the East-West Discourse — Turkey and Beyond.” Nationalities Papers: The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity
38 (3): 393–412.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Leonard. 1967. Rationalism and Nationalism in Russian 19th Century Political Thought. Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, Vincent. 1999. “The Myth of Development: A Critique of a Eurocentric Discourse.” In Critical Development Theory: Contributions to a New Paradigm, edited by Ronald, Munck and Dennis, O'Hearn, 1–27. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Westwood, John N.
1993. Endurance and Endeavour. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolff, Larry. 2004. Inventing Eastern Europe: The Map of Civilisation on the Mind of Enlightenment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Zenkovsky, Vasilii V.
1953. A History of Russian Philosophy, trans. George L. Kline, 2 vols. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar