Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T11:03:23.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Political Participation of Alevis: A Comparative Analysis of the Turkish Alevi Opening and the German Islam Conference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2020

Ayca Arkilic Open the ORCID record for Ayca Arkilic [Opens in a new window]  and
Ayse Ezgi Gurcan
Ayca Arkilic*
Affiliation:
Programme of Political Science and International Relations, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand and
Ayse Ezgi Gurcan
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Beykent University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Maslak Campus Ayazaga, Istanbul, Turkey
*
*Corresponding author. Email: ayca.arkilic@vuw.ac.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article focuses on the relationship between Alevis and the Turkish and German states. It does so by examining the Turkish Alevi Opening (2009–2010) and the German Islam Conference (2006–present), two unprecedented official platforms aimed at improving Alevis’ political participation. The study asks why such state-sponsored initiatives came into existence in Turkey and Germany, and why the German Islam Conference has proven more successful from the perspective of Alevis. It argues that even though the diffusion of EU norms and pressure from transnational advocacy networks have increased awareness regarding the Alevi issue, domestic factors have been more salient in the emergence and outcome of these initiatives in both countries.

Keywords

AleviTurkish Alevi OpeningGerman Islam Conferencepolitical participationEU
Type
Article
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 49 , Issue 5 , September 2021 , pp. 949 - 966
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Association for the Study of Nationalities

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AABF. 2020. About Us. https://alevi.com/en/home/. (Accessed March 1, 2020).Google Scholar
Agarin, Timofey, and Cordell, Karl. 2016. Minority Rights and Minority Protection in Europe. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Tawhida. 2011. Impact of the EU Law on Minority Rights. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Akgündüz, Ahmet. 2008. Labour Migration from Turkey to Western Europe, 1960–1974: A Multidisciplinary Analysis. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Aktürk, Şener. 2012. Regimes of Ethnicity and Nationhood in Germany, Russia, and Turkey. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139108898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ağı, Alevi Haber. 2019. “Fuat Ateş: ‘Aleviliğin kendine özgü bir inanç olduğu gerçeğini er veya geç Türkiye de kabul edecek…’” [“Fuat Ateş: ‘Turkey will eventually recognize Alevism as a distinct faith…].’” https://www.alevihaberagi.com/2314-aleviler-avrupada-yeniden-doguyor.html. (Accessed December 2, 2019).Google Scholar
Arkilic, Ayca. 2015. “The Limits of European Islam: Turkish Islamic Umbrella Organizations and their Relations with Host Countries—France and Germany.” Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 35 (1): 17–43.10.1080/13602004.2015.1019193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkilic, Ayca. 2016. “Between the Homeland and Host States: Turkey’s Diaspora Policies and Immigrant Political Participation in France and Germany.” PhD diss., The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Arkilic, Ayca. Forthcoming. “The Alevi Diaspora in France: Changing Relations with the Home and Host State in the 2000s.” In The Alevis: Dynamics of Recognition and Changing Rituals, edited by Markussen, Hege, Özkul, Derya, and Boyraz, Cemil. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Asad, Talal. 1993. Geneologies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. London: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Asad, Talal. 2003. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9780804783095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avcı, Gamze. 2005. “Religion, Transnationalism and Turks in Europe.” Turkish Studies 6 (2): 201–213.10.1080/14683840500119536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aviv, Efrat. 2016. “Millet System in the Ottoman Empire.” Oxford Bibliographies Online Datasets, November 28, 2016. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780195390155/obo-9780195390155-0231.xml. (Accessed November 30, 2019).Google Scholar
Aydın-Düzgit, Senem, and Kaliber, Alper. 2016. “Encounters with Europe in an Era of Domestic and International Turmoil: Is Turkey a De-Europeanising Candidate Country?” South European Society and Politics 21 (1): 1–14.10.1080/13608746.2016.1155282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardakçı, Mehmet. 2015. “The Alevi Opening of the AKP Government in Turkey: Walking a Tightrope between Democracy and Identity.” Turkish Studies 16 (3): 349–370.10.1080/14683849.2015.1050959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardakçı, Mehmet, Freyberg-Inan, Annette, Christoph, Giesel, and Leisse, Olaf. 2017. Religious Minorities in Turkey: Alevi, Armenians and Syriacs and the Struggle to Desecuritize Religious Freedom. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-27026-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barten, Ulrike. 2015. “Minority rights in the European Union after Lisbon.” Nordic Journal of Human Rights 33 (1): 74–94.10.1080/18918131.2015.1000053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayır, Derya. 2013. Minorities and Nationalism in Turkish Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Borovalı, Murat, and Boyraz, Cemil. 2014. “Turkish Secularism and Islam: A Difficult Dialogue with the Alevis.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 40 (4-5): 479–488.10.1177/0191453714522476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyraz, Cemil. 2019. “The Alevi Question and the Limits of Citizenship in Turkey.” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 46 (5): 767–780.10.1080/13530194.2019.1634396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börzel, Tanja, and Risse, Thomas. 2006. “Europeanization: The Domestic Impact of European Union Politics.” In Handbook of European Union Politics, edited by Jørgensen, Knud Erik, Pollack, Mark, and Rosamond, Ben, 483–505. London: Sage.10.4135/9781848607903.n26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buller, Jim, and Gamble, Andrew. 2002. “Conceptualising Europeanization.” Public Policy and Administration, 17 (2): 4–24.10.1177/095207670201700202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Charli. 2007. “Studying Issue (Non)-Adoption in Transnational Advocacy Networks.” International Organization 61 (3): 643–67.10.1017/S002081830707021XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey. 2005. “International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework.” International Organization 59 (4): 801–826.10.1017/S0020818305050289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottrel-Ghai, Jill, Ghai, Yash, Sing’Oei, Korir, and Wanyoike, Waikwa. 2013. “Taking Diversity Seriously: Minorities and Political Participation in Kenya.” Minority Rights Group International. https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/528496974.pdf. (Accessed November 30, 2019).Google Scholar
Çamuroğlu, Reha. 1998. “Alevi Revival in Turkey.” In Alevi Identity: Cultural, Religious, and Social Perspectives, edited by Olsson, Tord, Özdalga, Elisabeth, and Raudvere, Catharina, 79–84. Istanbul: Swedish Research Institute.Google Scholar
Çarkoğlu, Ali and Bilgili, Nazli. 2011. “A Precarious Relationship: The Alevi Minority, the Turkish State and the EU.” South European Society and Politics 16 (2): 351–364.10.1080/13608746.2011.577956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çarkoğlu, Ali and Elçi, Ezgi. 2019. “Alevis in Turkey.” In Routledge Handbook of Minorities in the Middle East, edited by Lowe, Paul S., 212–225. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Çelik, Filiz. 2017. “The Alevi of Dersim: A Psychosocial Approach to the Effects of the Massacre, Time, and Space.” In Alevis in Europe: Voices of Migration, Culture, and Identity, edited by Issa, Tözün, 46–68. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Konferenz, Deutsche Islam. 2008. German Islam Conference Interim Resume by the Working Groups and the Roundtable. http://www.deutsche-islam-konferenz.de/SharedDocs/Anlagen/DIK/EN/Downloads/Plenum/DIK-drittes-Plenum-en.pdf?__blob=publicationFile. (Accessed March 8, 2020).Google Scholar
Konferenz, Deutsche Islam. 2020a. Background: From an Initiative to a Common Goal. http://www.deutsche-islam-konferenz.de/DIK/EN/DIK/UeberDIK/Hintergrund/hintergrund-node.html. (Accessed March 8, 2020).Google Scholar
Konferenz, Deutsche Islam. 2020b. What is the DIK? http://www.deutsche-islam-konferenz.de/DIK/EN/DIK/UeberDIK/WasIstDIK/wasistdik-node.html. (Accessed March 8, 2020).Google Scholar
Konferenz, Deutsche Islam. 2020c. The German Islam Conference’s Programme of Work—Ambitious and with a Practical Focus. http://www.deutsche-islam-konferenz.de/DIK/EN/DIK/UeberDIK/Arbeitsprogramm/arbeitsprogramm-node.html. (Accessed March 8, 2020).Google Scholar
Konferenz, Deutsche Islam. 2020d. Overview: Recent Events in the DIK. http://www.deutsche-islam-konferenz.de/DIK/EN/DIK/ArbeitDIK/DIK2014ueberblick/dik-2014-ueberblick-node.html. (Accessed March 8, 2020).Google Scholar
Diez, Thomas, Stetter, Stephan, and Albert, Mathias. 2006. “The EU and Border Conflicts: The Transformative Power of Integration.” International Organization 60 (3): 563–593.10.1017/S0020818306060218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Markus. 2008. “Religio-Secular Metamorphoses: the Re-Making of Turkish Alevism.” Journal of American Academy of Religion 76 (4): 280–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Markus. 2015. “Turkish Politics of Doxa: Otherizing the Alevis as Heterodox.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 41 (4–5): 445–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esen, Berk and Gümüsçü, Sebnem. 2015. “Rising Competitive Authoritarianism in Turkey.” Third World Quarterly 37 (9): 1581–1606.10.1080/01436597.2015.1135732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission. 1998. Turkey Progress Report 1998. https://www.avrupa.info.tr/sites/default/files/2016-11/1998.pdf. (Accessed November 27, 2019).Google Scholar
European Commission. 2000. Turkey Progress Report 2000. https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/archives/pdf/key_documents/2000/strat_en.pdf. (Accessed November 28, 2019).Google Scholar
European Commission. 2009. Turkey Progress Report 2009. https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/key_documents/2009/tr_rapport_2009_en.pdf. (Accessed November 28, 2019).Google Scholar
European Commission. 2010. Turkey Progress Report 2010. https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/key_documents/2010/package/tr_rapport_2010_en.pdf. (Accessed November 30, 2019).Google Scholar
Grabbe, Heather. 2006. The EU’s Transformative Power: Europeanization Through Conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigoriadis, Ioannis. 2006. “Political Participation of Turkey’s Kurds and Alevis: A Challenge for Turkey’s Democratic Consolidation.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 6 (4): 445–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurcan, Ayse Ezgi. 2013. “Articulating and Aggregating Sectarian Interests: The Case of Alevis in Turkey.” PhD diss., Sabanci University.Google Scholar
Gurcan, Ayse Ezgi. 2015. The Problems of Religious Education in Turkey: Alevi Citizen Action and The Limits of ECtHR. Istanbul: Istanbul Policy Center. IPC–Mercator Policy Brief.Google Scholar
Gülalp, Haldun. 2013. “Introduction.” In Religion, Identity, and Politics: Germany and Turkey in Interaction, edited by Gülalp, Haldun and Seufert, Günther, 1–9. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haug, Sonja, Mussig, Stephanie, and Stichs, Anja. 2009. Muslimisches Leben in Deutschland: im Auftrag der Deutschen Islam Konferenz [Muslim Life in Germany: On Behalf of the German Islam Conference]. Nürnberg: Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge.Google Scholar
Aguilar, Hernandez, Luis, . 2018. Governing Muslims and Islam in Contemporary Germany: Race, Time, and the German Islam Conference. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, Marc Morjé. 2008. “The Causes and Consequences of Germany’s New Citizenship Law.” German Politics 17 (1): 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hürriyet. 2013. Alevilerden Yavuz Sultan Selim Protestosu [Yavuz Sultan Selim Protest from Alevis]. June 3. https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/alevilerden-yavuz-selim-protestosu-23422251. (Accessed March 7, 2020).Google Scholar
Hürriyet. 2015. İlk Alevilik Anabilim Dalı Hamburg Üniversitesi’nde Açıldı [The First Alevism Department Inaugurated at Hamburg University]. February 3. https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/avrupa/ilk-alevilik-anabilim-dali-hamburg-universitesinde-acildi-28106436#:~:text=Almanya'daki%20Hamburg%20%C3%9Cniversitesi%20D%C3%BCnya,hak%20e%C5%9Fitli%C4%9Fi%20anla%C5%9Fmas%C4%B1'%20kapsam%C4%B1nda%20oldu. (Accessed June 4, 2020).Google Scholar
Hürriyet. 2014. Diyanet Alevi Dedeleri Almanya’ya Gönderdi [The Diyanet Sent Alevi Dedes to Germany]. February 4. http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/diyanet-alevi-dedeleri-almanyaya-gonderdi-5890952. (Accessed March 8, 2020).Google Scholar
Hürriyet Daily News. 2013. 78 Percent of the Gezi Park Protest Detainees Were Alevis: Report. November 25. http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/78-percent-of-gezi-park-protest-detainees-were-alevis-report--58496. (Accessed December 3, 2019).Google Scholar
İçduygu, Ahmet and Soner, Ali. 2006. “Turkish Minority Rights Regime: Between Difference and Equality.” Middle Eastern Studies 42 (3): 447–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson-Preece, Jennifer. 2005. Minority Rights: Between Diversity and Community. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Celia, Aydın, Suavi, and Çetin, Ümit. 2018. “Editorial.” National Identities, 20 (1): 1-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaliber, Alper. 2014. “Contextual and Contested: Reassessing Europeanization in the Case of Turkey.” International Relations 27 (1): 52–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanner-Arias, Aimee, and Gürses, Mehmet. 2012. “The Complexities of Minority Rights in the European Union.” The International Journal of Human Rights 16 (2): 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karakaya-Stump, Ayfer. 2014. “Alevizing Gezi.” Jadaliyya. http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/17087/alevizing-gezi. (Accessed December 3, 2019).Google Scholar
Karakaya-Stump, Ayfer. 2018. “The AKP, Sectarianism, and the Alevis’ Struggle for Equal Rights in Turkey.” National Identities 20 (1): 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassimeris, Christos, and Tsoumpanou, Lina. 2008. “The Impact of the European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms on Turkey’s EU Candidacy.” The International Journal of Human Rights 12 (2): 329–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaya, Ayhan. 1998. “Multicultural Clientelism and Alevi Resurgence in the Turkish Diaspora: Berlin Alevis.” New Perspectives on Turkey 18: 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayhan, Kaya, 2016. “The Alevi-Bektashi Order in Turkey: Syncretism Transcending Natural Borders.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16 (2): 275–294.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kehl-Bodrogi, Krisztina. 2003. “Atatürk and the Alevis: A Holy Alliance?” In Turkey’s Alevi Enigma: A Comprehensive Overview, edited by White, Paul and Jongerden, Joost, 53–70. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Sanjeev, Khagram, Riker, James, and Sikkink, Kathryn, eds. 2002. Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks and Norms. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Klausen, Jytte. 2005. The Islamic Challenge: Politics and Religion in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klusmeyer, Douglas, and Papademetriou, Demetrios. 2013. Immigration Policy in the Federal Republic of Germany: Negotiating Membership and Remaking the Nation. 2 nd edition. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud. 2015. “Religious Fundamentalism and Hostility Against Out-Groups: A Comparison of Muslims and Christians in Western Europe.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41 (1): 33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurban, Dilek. 2010. “Protecting Marginalized Individuals and Minorities in the ECtHR: Litigation and Jurisprudence in Turkey.” In The European Court of Human Rights and the Rights of the Marginalized Individuals and Minorities in National Context, edited by Anagnostou, Dia and Psychogiopoulou, Evangelina, 119–136. Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Laurence, Jonathan. 2012. The Emancipation of Europe’s Muslims: The State’s Role in Minority Integration. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, Ceren. 2017. “Rethinking the Justice and Development Party’s Alevi ‘Openings.’” Turkish Studies, 18: 278–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manners, Ian. 2002. “Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?” Journal of Common Market Studies 40: 235–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mardin, Şerif. 1981. “Religion and Secularism in Turkey.” In Ataturk: Founder of a Modern State, edited by Ali, Kazancigil and Ozbudun, Ergun, 191–220. London: Hurst & Company.Google Scholar
Massicard, Elise. 2003. “Alevist Movements at Home and Abroad: Mobilization Spaces and Conjunction.” HAL Research Paper. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00655802/file/NPTMassicard.pdf. (Accessed December 4,2019).Google Scholar
Massicard, Elise. 2013. The Alevis in Turkey and Europe: Identity and Managing Territorial Diversity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Massicard, Elise. 2014. “Variations in the Judicialisation of the Alevi Issue: From Turkey to Europe,” trans. Raillard, Sarah-Louise. Revue française de science politique (64): 81–103.Google Scholar
Melikoff, Iréne. 1998. Hacı Bektaş: Efsaneden Gerçeğe [Hacı Bektaş: From Myth to Reality]. Istanbul: Cumhuriyet.Google Scholar
Micksch, Jürgen , and Süssmuth, Rita. 2005. Islamforen in Deutschland: Dialogue mit Muslimen [Islam Forums in Germany: Dialogue with Muslims]. Frankfurt am Main: Lembeck.Google Scholar
Mutluer, Nil. 2014. “A Case for Pluralism: The Alevis’ Latest Struggle Against Discrimination.” Turkish Policy Quarterly 13 (1): 149–158.Google Scholar
Müftüler-Baç, Meltem. 2005. “Turkey’s Political Reforms and the Impact of the European Union.” South European Society and Politics 10 (1): 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müftüler-Baç, Meltem. 2017. “Turkey’s Future with the European Union: An Alternative Model of Differentiated Integration.” Turkish Studies 18 (3): 416–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Jorgen. 2013. Muslim Political Participation in Europe. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oran, Baskın. 2018. Türkiye'de Azınlıklar: Kavramlar, Teori, Lozan, İç Mevzuat, İçtihat, Uygulama [Minorities in Turkey: Concepts, Theory, Lausanne, Legislation, Jurisprudence, Application]. İstanbul: İletişim.Google Scholar
Öniş, Ziya. 2008. “Turkey-EU Relations: Beyond the Current Stalemate.” Insight Turkey 10 (4): 35–50.Google Scholar
Özbudun, Ergun. 2007. “Democratization Reforms in Turkey, 1993–2004.” Turkish Studies 8 (2): 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özkul, Derya. 2015. “Alevi “Openings” and Politicization of the “Alevi Issue” during the AKP Rule.” Turkish Studies 16 (1): 80–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özkul, Derya. 2019. “The making of a Transnational Religion: Alevi Movement in Germany and the World Alevi Union.” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 46 (2): 259–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öztürk, Erdi. 2016. “Turkey’s Diyanet under AKP rule: from Protector to Imposer of State Ideology?” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16 (4): 619–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özyürek, Esra. 2009. “The Light of Alevi Fire Was Lit in Germany and Then Spread to Turkey: The Debate about the Relationship between Alevism and Islam.” Turkish Studies 10 (2): 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pir Sultan Abdal Cultural Association. 2020. Hakkımızda [About Us]. http://www.pirsultan.org/. (Accessed March 1,2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Heather M., Connable, Ben, Thaler, David E., and Scotten, Ali G.. 2018. Sectarianism in the Middle East: Implications for the United States. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rechel, Bernd. 2008. “What Has Limited the EU’s Impact on Minority Rights in Accession Countries?” East European Politics & Societies 22 (1): 171–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1995. Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures, and International Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenow-Williams, Kirsten. 2012. Organizing Muslims and Integrating Islam in Germany: New Developments in the 21st Century. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank, and Sedelmeier, Ulrich. 2004. “Governance by Conditionality: EU Rule Transfer to the Candidate Countries of Central and Eastern Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 11 (4): 661–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedelmeier, Ulrich. 2011. “Europeanization in New Member and Candidate States.” Living Reviews in European Governance 6 (1): 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selçuk, Elif. 2014. “Political Discourses on Alevis and Alevism During AKP Era.” Master’s Thesis, Sabanci University.Google Scholar
Shakman-Hurd, Elizabeth. 2014. “Alevis Under Law: The Politics of Religious Freedom in Turkey.” Journal of Law and Religion 29 (3): 416–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shankland, David. 2003. The Alevis in Turkey: The Emergence of a Secular Islamic Tradition. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair-Webb, Emma. 2003. “Sectarian Violence, the Alevi Minority and the Left: Kahramanmaraş 1978.” In Turkey’s Alevi Enigma: A Comprehensive Overview, edited by White, Paul and Jongerden, Joost, 215–235. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Sökefeld, Martin. 2008. Struggling for Recognition: The Alevi Movement in Germany and in Transnational Space. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Soner, Bayram Ali, and Toktaş, Şule. 2011. “Alevis and Alevism in the Changing Context of Turkish Politics: The Justice and Development Party’s Alevi Opening.” Turkish Studies 12 (3): 419–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subaşı, Necdet. 2009. 4 Haziran 2009 Alevi Açılımı Çalıştayı [4 June 2009 Alevi Opening Workshop]. http://www.necdetsubasi.com/alevi-calistaylar. (Accessed March 6, 2020).Google Scholar
Subaşı, Necdet. 2010. Alevi Açılımı Nihai Rapor [The Alevi Opening Final Report] http://www.necdetsubasi.com/alevi-calistaylar. (Accessed March 7,2020).Google Scholar
Tambar, Kabir. 2014. The Reckonings of Pluralism: Political Belonging and the Demands of History in Turkey. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Tank, Pınar. 2015. “The ‘Sunnification’ of Turkey’s Foreign Policy.” The New Middle East Blog. August 13. https://newmeast.wordpress.com/2015/08/13/the-sunnification-of-turkeys-foreign-policy/. (Accessed June 14, 2020).Google Scholar
Taş, Hakkı. 2015. “Can Alevis Speak? The Politics of Representation in Early Writings of Alevism.” Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations 26 (3): 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tekdemir, Ömer. 2018. “Constructing a Social Space for Alevi Political Identity: Religion, Antagonism, and Collective Passion.” National Identities 20 (1): 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tibi, Bassam. 2006. “Europeanizing Islam or the Islamization of Europe: Political Democracy v. Cultural Difference.” In Religion in an Expanding Europe, edited by Byrnes, Timothy and Katzenstein, Peter, 204–224. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocci, Nathalie, Hakim, Darbouche, Emerson, Michael, Fernandes, Sandra, Hanau-Santini, Ruth, Noutcheva, Gergana, and Portela, Clara. 2008. “The EU as a Normative Foreign Policy Actor.” CEPS Working Documents 281: 1–31.Google Scholar
Toktaş, Şule, and Aras, Bülent. 2009. “EU and Minority Rights in Turkey.” Political Science Quarterly 124 (4): 697–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turhan, Ebru, and Seufert, Günter. 2015. “German Interests and Turkey’s EU Accession Process: A Holistic Perspective.” Istanbul Policy Center Paper. http://research.sabanciuniv.edu/28704/1/IPC_EbruTurhanNovember2015.pdf. (Accessed December 6, 2019).Google Scholar
Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2020. Relations Between Turkey and the Federal Republic of Germany. http://www.mfa.gov.tr/relations-between-turkey-and-the-federal-republic-of-germany.en.mfa. (Accessed March 9, 2020).Google Scholar
Van Deth, Jan. 2014. “A Conceptual Map of Political Participation.” Acta Politica, 49: 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Antje, and Schwellnus, Guido. 2004. “Contested Norms in the Process of EU Enlargement: Non-Discrimination and Minority Rights.” Constitutionalism Web Papers 2. https://ideas.repec.org/p/erp/conweb/p0009.html. (Accessed November 29, 2019).Google Scholar
Yaka, Özge. 2016. “Why not EU? Dynamics of the Changing Turkish Attitudes Toward EU Membership.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 24 (1): 149–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yılmaz, Gözde. 2016. “From Europeanization to De-Europeanization: The Europeanization Process of Turkey in 1999–2014.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 24 (1): 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zırh, Besim Can. 2008. “Euro-Alevis: From Gastarbeiter to Transnational Community.” In The Making of World Society: Perspectives from Transnational Research, edited by Salzbrunn, Monika, Anghel, Remus, Gerharz, Eva, and Rescher, Gilberto, 103–132. London: Transaction Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar