Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-x5fd4 Total loading time: 0.525 Render date: 2021-02-28T10:43:06.263Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Automatic summarisation: 25 years On

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2019

Constantin Orăsan
Affiliation:
Research Institute in Information and Language Processing, University of Wolverhampton, UK
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Automatic text summarisation is a topic that has been receiving attention from the research community from the early days of computational linguistics, but it really took off around 25 years ago. This article presents the main developments from the last 25 years. It starts by defining what a summary is and how its definition changed over time as a result of the interest in processing new types of documents. The article continues with a brief history of the field and highlights the main challenges posed by the evaluation of summaries. The article finishes with some thoughts about the future of the field.

Type
Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Agnihotri, L., Kender, J., Dimitrova, N. and Zimmerman, J. (2005). User study for generating personalized summary profiles. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. IEEE pp. 10941097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonso, i Alemany L. and Fuentes, Fort M. (2003). Integrating cohesion and coherence for automatic summarization. In Proceedings of the tenth conference on European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics - Volume 2 (EACL ’03), Vol. 2. Association for Computational Linguistics, Strasbourg, PA, USA, Budapest, Hungary – April 12–17, pp. 18. doi:10.3115/1067737.1067739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ando, R., Boguraev, B., Byrd, R. and Neff, M. (2005). Visualization-enabled multi-document summarization by Iterative Residual Rescaling. Natural Language Engineering 11(1), 6786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANSI (1977). American National standard for writing abstracts. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication PC-20(4), 252254.Google Scholar
Azzam, S., Humphrey, K. and Gaizauskas, R. (1999). Using coreference chains for text summarisation. In Bagga, A., Baldwin, B. and Shelton, S. (eds), Proceedings of the Workshop on Coreference and its Applications, Maryland, USA, pp. 7784.Google Scholar
Bahdanau, D., Cho, K. and Bengio, Y. (2014). Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.0473.Google Scholar
Balahur, A., Kabadjov, M., Steinberger, J., Steinberger, R. and Montoyo, A. (2012). Challenges and solutions in the opinion summarization of user-generated content. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 39, 375398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barzilay, R. and Elhadad, M. (1999). Using lexical chains for text summarization. In Mani, I. and Maybury, M.T. (eds), Advances in Automatic Text Summarization, Chapter 10. The MIT Press, pp. 111122.Google Scholar
Barzilay, R. and McKeown, K.R. (2005). Sentence fusion for multidocument news summarization. Computational Linguistics 31(3), 297328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boguraev, B. and Kennedy, C. (1999). Salience-based content characterisation of text documents. In Mani, I. and Maybury, M.T. (eds), Advances in Automatic Text Summarization. The MIT Press, pp. 99110.Google Scholar
Borko, H. and Bernier, C.L. (1975). Abstracting Concepts and Methods. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brill, E. and Mooney, R.J. (1997). An overview of empirical natural language processing. AI Magazine 18(4), 1324.Google Scholar
Carenini, G., Ng, R. and Pauls, A. (2006). Multi-document summarization of evaluative text. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Association for Computational Linguistics, Strasbourg, PA, USA, Trento, Italy, 3–7 April, pp. 305312.Google Scholar
Chen, J. and Zhuge, H. (2016). Summarization of related work through citations. In 2016 12th International Conference on Semantics, Knowledge and Grids (SKG). IEEE, pp. 5461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, J. and Lapata, M. (2016). Neural summarization by extracting sentences and words. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Berlin, Germany. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 484494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, K.W. (2017). Emerging trends: I did it, I did it, I did it, but… Natural Language Engineering 23(3), 473480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleveland, D.B. (1983). Introduction to Indexing and Abstracting. Libraries Unlimited, Inc.Google Scholar
Cohan, A., Dernoncourt, F., Kim, D.S., Bui, T., Kim, S., Chang, W. and Goharian, N. (2018). A discourse-aware attention model for abstractive summarization of long documents. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 2 (Short Papers), New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 615621.Google Scholar
Conroy, J.M. and O’leary, D.P. (2001). Text summarization via Hidden Markov Models. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, pp. 406407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeJong, G. (1982). An overview of the FRUMP system. In Lehnert, W.G. and Ringle, M.H. (eds), Strategies for Natural Language Processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 149177.Google Scholar
Díaz, A. and Gervás, P. (2007). User-model based personalized summarization. Information Processing & Management Management 43(6), 17151734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaway, R.L., Drummey, K.W. and Mather, L.A. (2000). A comparison of rankings produced by summarization evaluation measures. In Proceedings of the NAACL-ANLP 2000 Workshop on Automatic Summarization, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 6978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmundson, H.P. (1969). New methods in automatic extracting. Journal of the ACM 16(2), 264285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erkan, G. and Radev, D.R. (2004). LexRank: graph-based centrality as salience in text summarization. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 22(1), 457479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feiguina, O. and Lapalme, G. (2007). Query-based summarization of customer reviews. In Kobti, Z. and Wu, D. (eds), Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2007. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 452463.Google Scholar
Filippova, K., Alfonseca, E., Colmenares, C.A., Kaiser, L. and Vinyals, O. (2015). Sentence compression by deletion with LSTMs. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Lisbon, Portugal. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 360368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fum, D., Guida, G. and Tasso, C. (1985). Evaluating importance: a step towards text summarisation. In Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Los Angeles, California, pp. 840844.Google Scholar
Gaizauskas, R. and Humphreys, K. (1997). Using a semantic network for information extraction. Natural Language Engineering 3(2), 147169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannakopoulos, G. and Karkaletsis, V. (2009). N-gram graphs: representing documents and document sets in summary system evaluation. In Proceedings of TAC 2009.Google Scholar
Goldstein, J., Kantrowitz, M., Mittal, V. and Carbonell, J. (1999). Summarizing text documents. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval - SIGIR’99. ACM Press, pp. 121128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, S.K. and Gupta, S.K. (2019). Abstractive summarization: an overview of the state of the art. Expert Systems with Applications 121, 4965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harnly, A., Nenkova, A., Passonneau, R. and Rambow, O. (2005). Automation of summary evaluation by the pyramid method. In Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), Borovets, Bulgaria, pp. 226232, Sept 21–23.Google Scholar
Hasler, L., Orăsan, C. and Mitkov, R. (2003). Building better corpora for summarisation. In Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2003, Lancaster, UK, pp. 309319.Google Scholar
Hermann, K.M., Kočiský, T., Grefenstette, E., Espeholt, L., Espeholt, L., Kay, W., Suleyman, M. and Blunsom, P. (2015). Teaching machines to read and comprehend NIPS 2015. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’15), pp. 16931701.Google Scholar
Hernández-Alvarez, M. and Gomez, J.M. (2016). Survey about citation context analysis: tasks, techniques, and resources. Natural Language Engineering 22(3), 327349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, L. and Mani, I. (2003). Evaluation. In Mitkov, R. (ed), The Oxford Handbook of Computational Linguistics. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hovy, E. (2003). Text summarisation. In Mitkov, R. (ed), The Oxford Handbook of Computational. Oxford University Press, pp. 583598.Google Scholar
Hovy, E. and Lin, C.-Y. (1999). Automated text summarization in SUMMARIST. In Mani, I. and Maybury, M.T. (eds), Advances in Automatic Text Summarization. The MIT Press, pp. 8197.Google Scholar
Hovy, E., Lin, C.-Y., Zhou, L. and Fukumoto, J. (2006). Automated summarization evaluation with basic elements. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Genoa, Italy: ELRA, May 22–28, pp. 899902.Google Scholar
Johnson, F. (1995). Automatic abstracting research. Library Review 44(8), 2836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katragadda, R. (2010). GEMS: generative modeling for evaluation of summaries. In Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2010, pp. 724735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1974). The Representation of Meaning in Memory. Oxford, England: The Experimental Psychology Series. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Knight, K. and Marcu, D. (2002). Summarization beyond sentence extraction: a probabilistic approach to sentence compression. Artificial Intelligence 139(1), 91107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, H., Noguchi, M. and Yatsuka, T. (2015). Summarization based on embedding distributions. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Lisbon, Portugal. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 19841989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupiec, J., Pedersen, J. and Chen, F. (1995). A trainable document summarizer. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval – SIGIR’95, Seattle, Washington, USA. ACM Press, pp. 6873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerman, K., Blair-Goldensohn, S. and Mcdonald, R. (2009). Sentiment summarization: evaluating and learning user preferences. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL (EACL 2009), Athens, Greece, pp. 514522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerman, K., Lerman, K., McDonald, R. and McDonald, R. (2009). Contrastive summarization: an experiment with consumer reviews. In Proceedings of NAACL HLT 2009: Short Papers, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 113116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C., Liu, Y. and Zhao, L. (2015). Improving update summarization via supervised ILP and sentence reranking. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 13171322.Google Scholar
Lin, C.-Y. (2004). ROUGE: a package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In Text Summarization Branches Out, pp. 7481.Google Scholar
Lin, C.-Y. and Hovy, E. (2003). Automatic evaluation of summaries using N-gram co-occurrence statistics. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology - NAACL’03, Vol. 1, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 7178.Google Scholar
Liu, B. (2012). Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining, Vol. 5, Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, Morgan & Claypool Publishers.Google Scholar
Lloret, E. and Palomar, M. (2011). Text summarisation in progress: a literature review. Artificial Intelligence Review 37(1), 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloret, E. and Palomar, M. (2013). COMPENDIUM: a text summarisation tool for generating summaries of multiple purposes, domains, and genres. Natural Language Engineering 19(2), 147186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloret, E., Plaza, L. and Aker, A. (2018). The challenging task of summary evaluation: an overview. Language Resources and Evaluation 52(1), 101148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhn, H.P. (1958). The automatic creation of literature abstracts. IBM Journal of Research and Development 2(2), 159165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, W., Liu, F., Liu, Z. and Litman, D. (2018). A novel ILP framework for summarizing content with high lexical variety. Natural Language Engineering 24(6), 887920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mani, I. (2001a). Automatic Summarization. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Natural Language Processing. John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mani, I. (2001b). Summarization Evaluation: An Overview. In Proceedings of the Second NTCIR Workshop on Research in Chinese & Japanese Text Retrieval and Text Summarization. National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
Mani, I. and Bloedorn, E. (1998). Machine learning of generic and user-focused summarization. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth National/Tenth Conference on Artificial Intelligence/Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’98/IAAI’98). MIT Press, pp. 820826.Google Scholar
Mani, I., Firmin, T., House, D., Chrzanowski, M., Klein, G., Hirshman, L., Sundheim, B. and Obrst, L. (1998). The TIPSTER SUMMAC Text Summarisation Evaluation: Final Report. Technical report MTR 98W0000138, The MITRE Corporation.Google Scholar
Mani, I., Klein, G., House, D., Hirschman, L., Firmin, T. and Sundheim, B. (2002). SUMMAC: a text summarization evaluation. Natural Language Engineering 8(1), 4368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mani, I. and Maybury, M.T. (eds) (1999). Advances in Automatic Text Summarisation. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mann, W.C. and Thompson, S.A. (1988). Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organisation. Text 3(8), 234281.Google Scholar
Marcu, D. (1997). From discourse structures to text summaries. In Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization Proceedings of a Workshop, Association for Computational Linguistics, Madrid, Spain, July 11, pp. 8288.Google Scholar
Marcu, D. (2000). The Theory and Practice of Discourse Parsing and Summarisation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Margarido, P.R.A., Pardo, T.A.S., Antonio, G.M., Fuentes, V.B., Aires, R., Aluísio, S.M. and Fortes, R.P.M. (2008). Automatic summarization for text simplification. In Companion Proceedings of the XIV Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web - WebMedia’08, New York, New York, USA, pp. 310. ACM Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mihalcea, R. and Tarau, P. (2004). TextRank: bringing order into texts. In Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 404411.Google Scholar
Minel, J.L., Nugier, S. and Piat, G. (1997). How to appreciate the quality of automatic text summarization? In Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization, Madrid, Spain, pp. 2530.Google Scholar
Mitkov, R., Evans, R., Orăsan, C., Ha, L.A. and Pekar, V. (2007). Anaphora resolution: to what extent does it help NLP applications? In Branco, A. (ed), Anaphora: Analysis, Algorithms and Applications, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNAI 4410). Springer-Verlag, pp. 179190.Google Scholar
Nallapati, R., Zhou, B., dos Santos, C., Gulcehre, C. and Xiang, B. (2016). Abstractive text summarization using sequence-to-sequence RNNs andbeyond. In Proceedings of The 20th SIGNLL Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, Berlin, Germany. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 280290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naserasadi, A., Khosravi, H. and Sadeghi, F. (2019). Extractive multi-document summarization based on textual entailment and sentence compression via knapsack problem. Natural Language Engineering 25(1), 121146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nenkova, A. and McKeown, K. (2012). A survey of text summarization techniques. In Aggarwal, Charu C. and Zhai, Cheng Xiang (eds.), Mining Text Data, Boston, MA: Springer US, pp. 4376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nenkova, A. and Passonneau, R. (2004). Evaluating content selection in summarization: the pyramid method. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: HLT-NAACL 2004, Boston, MA, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 145152.Google Scholar
Neto, J.L., Freitas, A.A. and Kaestner, C.A.A. (2002). Automatic text summarization using a machine learning approach. In Advances in Artificial Intelligence, 16th Brazilian Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Porto de Galinhas/Recife, Brazil, pp. 205215.Google Scholar
Orăsan, C. (2006). Comparative Evaluation of Modular Automatic Summarisation Systems Using CAST. PhD thesis, University of Wolverhampton.Google Scholar
Orăsan, C. and Chiorean, O.A. (2008). Evaluation of a cross-lingual Romanian–English multi-documentsummariser. In Proceedings of 6th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC2008), Marrakech, Morocco, pp. 21142119.Google Scholar
Over, P., Dang, H. and Harman, D. (2007). DUC in context. Information Processing & Management 43(6), 15061520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owczarzak, K., Conroy, J.M., Dang, H.T. and Nenkova, A. (2012). An assessment of the accuracy of automatic evaluation in summarization. In Proceedings of Workshop on Evaluation Metrics and System Comparison for Automatic Summarization, Montreal, Canada, pp. 19.Google Scholar
Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T. and Zhu, W. (2002). BLEU: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics Annual Meeting (ACL), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, pp. 311318.Google Scholar
Passonneau, R.J. (2010). Formal and functional assessment of the pyramid method for summary content evaluation. Natural Language Engineering 16(2), 107131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qazvinian, V. and Radev, D.R. (2008). Scientific paper summarization using citation summary networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2008), Manchester, UK, pp. 689696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radev, D.R., Jing, H. and Budzikowska, M. (2000). Centroid-based summarization of multiple documents: sentence extraction, utility-based evaluation and user studies. In Proceedings of the NAACL-ANLP 2000 Workshop: Automatic Summarization, Seattle, Washington, April 30, pp. 2130.Google Scholar
Reiter, E. and Dale, R. (1997). Building applied natural language generation systems. Natural Language Engineering 3(1), 5787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rush, A.M., Chopra, S. and Weston, J. (2015). A neural attention model for abstractive sentence summarization. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Lisbon, Portugal. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 379389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, S. and Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 3rd Edn. New Jersey, USA: Pearson.Google Scholar
Saggion, H. (2008). Automatic summarization: an overview. Revue française de linguistique appliquée 13(1), 6381.Google Scholar
Salton, G., Singhal, A., Mitra, M. and Buckley, C. (1997). Automatic text structuring and summarization. Information Processing and Management 33(2), 193207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spärck-Jones, K. (1999). Automatic summarizing: factors and directions. In Mani, I. and Maybury, M.T. (eds), Advances in Automatic Text Summarization, Chapter 1. The MIT Press, pp. 112.Google Scholar
Spärck-Jones, K. (2001). Automatic language and information processing: rethinking evaluation. Natural Language Engineering 7(1), 2946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spärck-Jones, K. and Galliers, J.R. (1996). Evaluating Natural Language Processing Systems: An Analysis and Review, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 1083. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Srihari, R.K., Li, W., Cornell, T. and Niu, C. (2008). InfoXtract: a customizable intermediate level information extraction engine. Natural Language Engineering 14(1), 3369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanti, M., Gatt, A. and Camilleri, K.P. (2018). Where to put the image in an image caption generator. Natural Language Engineering 24(3), 467489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teufel, S. and Moens, M. (1997). Sentence extraction as a classification task. In Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization Proceedings of a Workshop, Association for Computational Linguistics, Madrid, Spain, July 11, pp. 5865.Google Scholar
Teufel, S. and Moens, M. (2002). Summarizing scientific articles: experiments with relevance and rhetorical status. Computational Linguistics 28(4), 409445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tigelaar, A.S., Op Den, Akker R. and Hiemstra, D. (2010). Automatic summarisation of discussion fora. Natural Language Engineering 16(2), 161192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, R. (1999). Automatic Summarising and the CLASP System. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
UzZaman, N., Bigham, J.P. and Allen, J.F. (2011). Multimodal summarization of complex sentences. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces - IUI’11, New York, New York, USA. ACM Press, p. 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verberne, S., Boves, L., Oostdijk, N. and Coppen, P.-A. (2010). What is not in the bag of words for why -QA? Computational Linguistics 36(2), 229245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verberne, S., Krahmer, E., Wubben, S. and van den Bosch, A. (2019). Query-based summarization of discussion threads. Natural Language Engineering, 127. doi:10.1017/S1351324919000123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wan, X. (2011). Using bilingual information for cross-language document summarization. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 15461555.Google Scholar
Yang, L., Ai, Q., Spina, D., Chen, R.-C., Pang, L., Croft, W.B., Guo, J. and Scholer, F. (2016). Beyond Factoid QA: effective methods for non-factoid answer sentence retrieval. In Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2016, pp. 115128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, J.-g., Wan, X. and Xiao, J. (2017). Recent advances in document summarization. Knowledge and Information Systems 53(2), 297336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yogatama, D., Liu, F. and Smith, N.A. (2015). Extractive summarization by maximizing semantic volume. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Lisbon, Portugal. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 19611966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, L., Ticrea, M. and Hovy, E. (2004). Multi-document biography summarization. In Proceedings of the Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2004), Association for Computational Linguistics, Barcelona, Spain, July 25–26, pp. 434441.Google Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 96
Total number of PDF views: 169 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 19th September 2019 - 28th February 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Automatic summarisation: 25 years On
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Automatic summarisation: 25 years On
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Automatic summarisation: 25 years On
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *