Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:24:25.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making fine-grained and coarse-grained sense distinctions, both manually and automatically

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2006

MARTHA PALMER ,
HOA TRANG DANG  and
CHRISTIANE FELLBAUM
MARTHA PALMER
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Colorado, CO, USA e-mail: mpalmer@colorado.edu
HOA TRANG DANG
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA e-mail: hoa.dang@nist.gov
CHRISTIANE FELLBAUM
Affiliation:
Princeton University, NJ, USA e-mail: fellbaum@clarity.princeton.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper we discuss a persistent problem arising from polysemy: namely the difficulty of finding consistent criteria for making fine-grained sense distinctions, either manually or automatically. We investigate sources of human annotator disagreements stemming from the tagging for the English Verb Lexical Sample Task in the SENSEVAL-2 exercise in automatic Word Sense Disambiguation. We also examine errors made by a high-performing maximum entropy Word Sense Disambiguation system we developed. Both sets of errors are at least partially reconciled by a more coarse-grained view of the senses, and we present the groupings we use for quantitative coarse-grained evaluation as well as the process by which they were created. We compare the system's performance with our human annotator performance in light of both fine-grained and coarse-grained sense distinctions and show that well-defined sense groups can be of value in improving word sense disambiguation by both humans and machines.

Type
Papers
Information
Natural Language Engineering , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 2007 , pp. 137 - 163
Copyright
2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)