Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:49:29.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Representation of sentence meaning (A JNLE Special Issue)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2019

Ondřej Bojar ,
Raffaella Bernardi  and
Bonnie Webber
Ondřej Bojar*
Affiliation:
Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, ÚFAL Malostranské nám 25, Praha 1, 118 00, Czech Republic
Raffaella Bernardi
Affiliation:
DISI and CIMeC, University of Trento, Via Calepina, 14, 38122 Trento TN, Italy
Bonnie Webber
Affiliation:
School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: bojar@ufal.mff.cuni.cz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper serves as a short overview of the JNLE special issue on representation of the meaning of the sentence, bringing together traditional symbolic and modern continuous approaches. We indicate notable aspects of sentence meaning and their compatibility with the two streams of research and then summarize the papers selected for this special issue.

Keywords

continuous representation of sentencessentence meaningvector space
Type
Article
Information
Natural Language Engineering , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , July 2019 , pp. 427 - 432
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alishahi, A., Chrupała, G. and Linzen, T. (2019). A report on the first BlackboxNLP workshop. Natural Language Engineering 25(4), 543–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banarescu, L., Bonial, C., Cai, S., Georgescu, M., Griffitt, K., Hermjakob, U., Knight, K., Koehn, P., Palmer, M. and Schneider, N. (2013). Abstract Meaning Representation for Sembanking. In Proceedings of the 7th Linguistic Annotation Workshop, Sophia, Bulgaria.Google Scholar
Bod, R. (2013). A New History of the Humanities: The Search for Principles and Patterns from Antiquity to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chersoni, E., Santus, E., Pannitto, L., Lenci, A., Blache, P. and Huang, C.-R. (2019). A structured distributional model of sentence meaning and processing. Natural Language Engineering 25(4), 483–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croce, D., Rossini, D. and Basili, R. (2019). Neural Embeddings: accurate and readable inferences based on semantic kernels. Natural Language Engineering 25(4), 519–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahane, S. (2003). The meaning-text theory. In Agel, V., Eichinger, L., Eroms, H.-W., Hellwig, P., Heringer, H. and Lobin, H. (eds), Dependency and Valency. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. 1. Halbband, vol. 1. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 546–570.Google Scholar
Karlgren, J. and Kanerva, P. (2019). High-dimensional distributed semantic spaces for utterances. Natural Language Engineering 25(4), 503–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, B.C. (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Maillard, J., Clark, S. and Yogatama, D. (2019). Jointly learning sentence embeddings and syntax with unsupervised Tree-LSTMs. Natural Language Engineering 25(4), 433–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mel’čuk, I.A. (1988). Dependency Syntax - Theory and Practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Merkx, D. and Frank, S. (2019). Learning semantic representations from visually grounded language without lexical knowledge. Natural Language Engineering 25(4), 451–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G. and Dean, J. (2013). Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. CoRR abs/1301.3781.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T., Cohen, W., Hruschka, E., Talukdar, P., Yang, B., Betteridge, J., Carlson, A., Dalvi, B., Gardner, M., Kisiel, B., Krishnamurthy, J., Lao, N., Mazaitis, K., Mohamed, T., Nakashole, N., Platanios, E., Ritter, A., Samadi, M., Settles, B., Wang, R., Wijaya, D., Gupta, A., Chen, X., Saparov, A., Greaves, M. and Welling, J. (2018). Never-ending learning. Communications of the ACM 61(5), 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sgall, P., Hajičová, E. and Panevová, J. (1986). The Meaning of the Sentence and Its Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects. Prague, Czech Republic/Dordrecht, Netherlands: Academia/Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Talman, A., Yli-Jyrä, A. and Tiedemann, J. (2019). Sentence embeddings in NLI with iterative refinement encoders. Natural Language Engineering 25(4), 467–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xue, N., Bojar, O., Hajič, J., Palmer, M., Urešová, Z. and Zhang, X. 2014. Not an interlingua, but close: Comparison of English AMRs to Chinese and Czech. In Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Declerck, T., Loftsson, H., Maegaard, B. and Mariani, J. (eds), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2014), Reykjavík, Iceland. European Language Resources Association, pp. 1765–1772.Google Scholar