Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Statistical evidence on the effect of production changes on induced seismicity

  • Danijela Sijacic (a1), Frank Pijpers (a2), Manuel Nepveu (a3) and Karin van Thienen-Visser (a1)
Abstract

Depletion of the Groningen gas field has induced earthquakes, although the north of the Netherlands is a tectonically inactive region. Increased seismic activity raised public concern which led the government to initiate a number of studies with the aim of understanding the cause(s) of the earthquakes. If the relationship between production and seismicity were understood then production could be optimized in such a way that the risk of induced seismicity would be minimal. The main question remains how production is correlated with induced seismicity. The Minister of Economic Affairs of the Netherlands decided to reduce production starting from 17 January 2014, specifically in the centre of the gas field as it has the highest rates of seismicity, the largest-magnitude events and the highest compaction values of the field.

A reduction in production could possibly lead to a reduced rate of compaction. Additionally a reduction of production rate could lead to a reduced stress rate increase on the existing faults and consequently fewer seismic events per year. One might envisage a ‘bonus effect’ in the events reduction in the sense that the total number of events will be less, with the same total production smeared out over a longer period. This is as yet unclear.

In this paper we apply different statistical methods to look for evidence supporting or disproving a decrease in the number of seismic events due to production reduction.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Statistical evidence on the effect of production changes on induced seismicity
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Statistical evidence on the effect of production changes on induced seismicity
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Statistical evidence on the effect of production changes on induced seismicity
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email: daniela.sijacic@tno.nl
References
Hide All
Bak, P. & Tang, C., 1989. Earthquakes as a self-organized critical phenomenon. Journal of Geophysical Research 94 (B11): 15,63515,637.
Bourne, S.J., Oates, S.J., van Elk, J. & Doornhof, D., 2014. A seismological model for earthquakes induced by fluid extraction from a subsurface reservoir. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 119 (12): 89919015.
Gregory, P.C., 2010. Bayesian logical data analysis for the physical sciences. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge).
Gupta, A. & Baker, J.W., 2015. A Bayesian Change Point Model to detect changes in event occurrence rates, with application to induced seismicity. 12th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, 1215 July 2015, Vancouver, Canada. Conference proceedings.
Langenbruch, C. & Zoback, M.D., 2016. How will induced seismicity in Oklahoma respond to decreased saltwater injection rates? Science Advances 2 (11): e1601542.
Main, I.G., O'Brien, G. & Henderson, J.R., 2000. Statistical physics of earthquakes: comparison of distribution exponents for source area and potential energy and the dynamic emergence of log-periodic energy quanta. Journal of Geophysical Research 105 (B3): 61056126.
McClure, M., Gibson, R., Chiu, K.-K. & Ranganath, R. (2017), Identifying potentially induced seismicity and assessing statistical significance in Oklahoma and California. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 122 (3).
McGarr, A., Simpson, D. & Seeber, L., 2002. Case histories of induced and triggered seismicity. In: Lee, W. H. K., Kanamori, H., Jennings, P.C. & Kisslinger, C. (eds): International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology, Part A:. Academic Press (London): 647661.
Muntendam, A.G. & de Waal, J.A., 2013. Reassessment of the probability of higher magnitude earthquakes in the Groningen gas field, including a position statement by KNMI. KNMI Report. State Supervision of Mines (The Hague): 35pp.
NAM. 2013. Wijziging winningsplan Groningen 2013, inclusief technische bijlage Groningen winningsplan 2013. Available at www.namplatform.nl/content/files/2013-11-29-gewijzigd-winningsplan-groningen-2013-openbaar-deel_zonder-contactgegevens.pdf, last accessed 10 December 2015.
Nepveu, M., van Thienen-Visser, K. & Sijacic, D., 2016. Statistics of seismic events at the Groningen field. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 14 (12): 33433362.
Pijpers, F.P., 2014. Phase 0 report 2: significance of trend changes in tremor rates in Groningen. Statistics Netherlands (The Hague). Available at https://www.cbs.nl/-/media/imported/onze%20diensten/methoden/dataverzameling/aanvullende%20onderzoeksbeschrijvingen/documents/2014/49/fase0rep2sodmcbsv13.pdf?la=nl-nl
Pijpers, F.P., 2015a. Phase 1 update May 2015: significance of trend changes in tremor rates in Groningen. Statistics Netherlands (The Hague). Available at https://www.cbs.nl/-/media/_pdf/2016/41/fase1updatemay2015tremors_v1.pdf
Pijpers, F.P., 2015b. Trend changes in tremor rates in Groningen: update November 2015. Statistics Netherlands (The Hague). Available at https://www.cbs.nl/-/media/imported/onze%20diensten/methoden/dataverzameling/aanvullende%20onderzoeksbeschrijvingen/documents/2015/44/tremors_nov2015.pdf?la=nl-nl
Pijpers, F.P., 2015c. A phenomenological relationship between gas production variations and tremor rates in Groningen. Statistics Netherlands (The Hague). Available at https://www.cbs.nl//media/imported/onze%20diensten/methoden/dataverzameling/aanvullende%20onderzoeksbeschrijvingen/documents/2015/44/correlations_nov2015.pdf?la=nl-nl
Pijpers, F.P., 2016a. Trend changes in tremor rates in Groningen: update May 2016. Statistics Netherlands (The Hague). Available at www.cbs.nl/-/media/_pdf/2016/24/tremors_apr2016.pdf
Pijpers, F.P., 2016b. Trend changes in tremor rates in Groningen: update November 2016. Statistics Netherlands (The Hague). Available at www.cbs.nl/-/media/_pdf/2016/47/tremors_nov2016.pdf
Pijpers, F.P., 2016c. A phenomenological relationship between reservoir pressure variations and tremor rates in Groningen. Statistics Netherlands (The Hague). Available at https://www.cbs.nl//media/_pdf/2016/24/correlations_may2016.pdf
Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T. & Flannery, B.P., 1997. Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge).
Raftery, A. & Akman, V., 1986. Bayesian analysis of a Poisson Process with a change point. Biometrika 73 (1): 8589.
Reasenberg, P. 1985. Second-order moment of central California seismicity, 1969–82. Journal of Geophysical Research 90: 5479–95.
Segall, P. (1992), Induced stresses due to fluid extraction from axisymmetric reservoirs. Pure and Applied Geophysics 139 (3–4): 535560.
TNO (Geological Survey of the Netherlands), 2013. Toetsing van de bodemdalingsprognoses en seismische hazard ten gevolge van gaswinning van het Groningen veld. TNO report 2013 R11953, 23 December.
TNO, 2014. Recent developments of the Groningen field in 2014 and, specifically, the southwest periphery of the field. TNO report 2014 R 11703, 9 December.
TNO, 2016. Groningen field 2013 to present; gas production and induced seismicity. TNO report 2016R10425, May. Available at http://nlog.nl/groningen-gasveld-0
van Stiphout, T., Zhuang, J. & Marsan, D., 2012. Seismicity declustering. Community online resources for Statistical Seismicity Analysis.
van Wees, J.D., Buijze, L., van Thienen-Visser, K., Nepveu, M., Wassing, B.B.T. & Orlic, B. 2014. Geomechanics response and induced seismicity during gas field depletion in the Netherlands. Geothermics 52: 206219.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Netherlands Journal of Geosciences
  • ISSN: 0016-7746
  • EISSN: 1573-9708
  • URL: /core/journals/netherlands-journal-of-geosciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 19
Total number of PDF views: 297 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 134 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 17th January 2018 - 24th April 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.