Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T09:14:19.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The networked question in the digital era: How do networked, bounded, and limited individuals connect at different stages in the life course?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2019

Barry Wellman*
Affiliation:
NetLab Network, Toronto
Anabel Quan-Haase
Affiliation:
Western University, London, Ontario, Canada, (e-mails: aquan@uwo.ca; mharpe22@uwo.ca)
Molly-Gloria Harper
Affiliation:
Western University, London, Ontario, Canada, (e-mails: aquan@uwo.ca; mharpe22@uwo.ca)
*
*Corresponding author. Email: wellman@chass.utoronto.ca

Abstract

We used in-depth interviews with 101 participants in the East York section of Toronto, Canada to understand how digital media affects social connectivity in general—and networked individualism in particular—for people at different stages of the life course. Although people of all ages intertwined their use of digital media with their face-to-face interactions, younger adults used more types of digital media and have more diversified personal networks. People in different age-groups conserved media, tending to stick with the digital media they learned to use in earlier life stages. Approximately one-third of the participants were Networked Individuals: In each age-group, they were the most actively using digital media to maintain ties and to develop new ones. Another one-third were Socially Bounded, who often actively used digital media but kept their connectivity within a smaller set of social groups. The remaining one-third, who were Socially Limited, were the least likely to use digital media. Younger adults were the most likely to be Networked Individuals, leading us to wonder if the percentage of the population who are Bounded or Limited will decline over time.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Special Issue Editors: Brea L. Perry, Bernice A. Pescosolido, Mario L. Small, and Ann McCranie

References

Agneessens, F., Waege, H., & Lievens, J. (2006). Diversity in social support by role relations. Social Networks, 28(4), 427441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, B. Y. M. (2015). American demographics of digital device ownership. Retrived from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/29/the-demographics-of-device-ownership.Google Scholar
Bennett, M. (1994). Towards ethnorelativism. In Paige, R. M. (Ed.), Education for the intercultural experience (2nd ed., pp. 2171). Boston: Nicholas Brealey.Google Scholar
boyd, d. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites. In. Buckingham, D. (Ed.), Youth, identity and digital media (pp. 119142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brokaw, T. (1998). The greatest generation. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (2001). Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. In Lin, N., Cook, K., & Burt, R. S. (Eds.), Social capital (pp. 3156). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Campbell, H. (Ed.). (2012). Digital religion. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chang, P. F., Choi, Y. H., Bazarova, N. N., & Lockenhoff, C. E. (2015). Age differences in online social networking. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(2), 221239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 44, S95S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornwell, B., & Laumann, E. (2008). The social connectedness of older adults. American Sociological Review, 73(2), 185203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornwell, E. Y., & Waite, L. J. (2009). Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and health among older adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 50, 3148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickens, A. P., Richards, S. H., Greaves, C. J., & Campbell, J. L. (2011). Interventions targeting social isolation in older people. BMC Public Health, 11(647), 122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dotson, T. (2017). Technically together. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, É. (1893 [1993]). The division of labor in society. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Durkheim, É. (1897 [1951]). Suicide. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Elder, G. H., Johnson, M. K., & Crosnoe, R. (2003). The emergence and development of life course theory. In Mortimer, J.T., & Shanahan, M.J., Handbook of the life course (pp. 319). Boston: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, J. (2008). Learning transitions in adult life course. Sociologia, 32, 117.Google Scholar
Fischer, C. (1982). To dwell among friends. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Florida, R. (2014). The rise of the creative class–revisited: Revised and expanded. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Frank, T. (2004). What’s the matter with Kansas. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Fung, H. H., Carstensen, L. L., & Lang, F. R. (2001). Age-related patterns in social networks among European Americans and African Americans. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 53(3), 185206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, H. (1962). The urban villagers. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Greer, S. (1962). The emerging city. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hagestad, G. O., & Uhlenberg, P. (2005). The social separation of old and young. Journal of Social Issues, 61(2), 343360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, K. N. (2016). Persistent and pervasive community. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(1), 101124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, K. N., & Wellman, B. (2018). Lost and saved again. Contemporary Sociology, 47(6), 643651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargittai, E. (2018). Biases in big data. Social Science Computer Review. doi:10.1177/0894439318788322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargittai, E., & Dobransky, K. (2017). Old dogs, new clicks. Canadian Journal of Communication, 42(2), 196212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, A. R. (2016). Strangers in their own land. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Hogan, D. P. (1981). Transitions and social change. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, D. P., & Astone, N. M. (1986). The transition to adulthood. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 109130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, S. (2011). Never say die. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Kennedy, T., & Wellman, B. (2007). The networked household. Information, Communication & Society, 10(5), 647670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, C.-H. (2019). Motivations, usage, and perceived social networks within and beyond social media. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 24(3), 126145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loach, K., & Laverty, P. (2016). I, Daniel Blake. London: Sixteen Films.Google Scholar
Merton, R. (1957). Patterns of influence: Cosmopolitans and locals. In Merton, R. (Ed.), Social theory and social structure (pp. 387420). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mok, D., Wellman, B., & Basu, R. (2007). Did distance matter before the Internet? Social Networks, 29(3), 430461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mok, D., Wellman, B., & Carrasco, J. A. (2010). Does distance matter in the age of the Internet? Urban Studies, 47(13), 27472783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Payne, M., & Welch, D. (2015). East York. Retrieved from https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/east-york/.Google Scholar
Peplau, L. (1982). Loneliness. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Quan-Haase, A., Mo, G.Y., & Wellman, B. (2017). Connected seniors. Information, Communication & Society, 20(7), 967998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quan-Haase, A., Wang, H., Wellman, B., & Zhang, A. (2018). Weaving family connections on and offline. In Neves, B. B., & Casimiro, C. (Eds.), Connecting families? (pp. 5777). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Quan-Haase, A., Williams, C., Kicevski, M., Elueze, I., & Wellman, B. (2018). Dividing the grey divide. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(9), 12071228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2019). The triple revolution in everyday life. In Graham, M., & Dutton, W. (Eds.), Society and the internet (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, L., Cotton, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., … Stern, M. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 569582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, L. (2018). The identity curation game: digital inequality, identity work, and emotion management. Information, Communication & Society, 21(5), 661680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreurs, K., Quan-Haase, A., & Martin, K. (2017). Problematizing the digital literacy paradox in the context of older adults’ ICT use. Canadian Journal of Communication, 42(2), 359377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Settersten, R. A. Jr., & Ray, B. (2010). What’s going on with young people today? The Future of Children, 20(1), 1941.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simmel, G. (1922 [1955]). The web of group affiliations. In Wolff, K. (Ed.), Conflict and the web of group affiliations (pp. 125195). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A., & Anderson, M. (2018). Social media use in 2018. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewinternet.org/2018/03/01/social-media-use-in-2018/.Google Scholar
Taylor, K., & Silver, L. (2019). Smartphone ownership is growing rapidly around the world, but not always equally. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewglobal.org/2019/02/05/in-emerging-economies-smartphone-adoption-has-grown-more-quickly-among-younger-generations/.Google Scholar
Tönnies, F. (1887 [1955]). Community and organization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Toronto City Planning (2018). Toronto and East York: City of Toronto Community Council Area Profiles 2016 Census. Retrieved from https://www.toronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/977c-City_Planning_2016_Census_Profile_2014_Wards_CCA_TorontoEastYork.pdf.Google Scholar
Toronto Neighbourhood Guide (n.d.). History of East York. Retrieved from http://www.torontoneighbourhoods.net/neighbourhoods/east-york/east-york/history.Google Scholar
Population, Toronto (2017). World population review – Toronto population 2018. Retrieved from http://worldpopulationreview.com/.Google Scholar
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Twenge, J. (2017). iGen. New York: Atria.Google ScholarPubMed
Uchitelle, L. (2019). To add jobs, look past manufacturing. New York Times, pp. BU89. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/02/business/manufacturing-jobs-infrastructure.html.Google Scholar
Voltaire, F. (1769 [2016]). Candide. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. (1992). The new tribalism. Dissent, 39, 164174.Google Scholar
Wang, H., Zhang, R., & Wellman, B. (2018). Are older adults networked individuals? Information, Communication & Society, 21(5), 681696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. (1922[2009]) The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Wellman, B. (1979). The community question. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 12011231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, B. (1988). The community question re-evaluated. In Smith, M. P. (Ed.), Power, community and the city (pp. 81107). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place and cyberspace. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(2), 227252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, B., Hogan, B., Berg, w. K., Boase, J., Carrasco, J.-A., Côté, R., … Tran, P. (2006). Connected lives. In Purcell, P. (Ed.), Networked neighbourhoods. (pp. 157211). Guildford, UK: Springer.Google Scholar
Wellman, B., & Leighton, B. (1979). Networks, neighborhoods and communities. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 14, 363390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 437456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, B., & Tindall, D. (1993). Reach out and touch some bodies. Progress in Communication Science, 12, 6394.Google Scholar
Wellman, B., & Wetherell, C. (1996). Social network analysis of historical communities. History of the Family, 1(1), 97121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, B., & Wortley, S. (1990). Different strokes from different folks. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 558588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology, 44, 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar