Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Likelihoods for fixed rank nomination networks

  • PETER HOFF (a1), BAILEY FOSDICK (a2), ALEX VOLFOVSKY (a3) and KATHERINE STOVEL (a4)

Abstract

Many studies that gather social network data use survey methods that lead to censored, missing, or otherwise incomplete information. For example, the popular fixed rank nomination (FRN) scheme, often used in studies of schools and businesses, asks study participants to nominate and rank at most a small number of contacts or friends, leaving the existence of other relations uncertain. However, most statistical models are formulated in terms of completely observed binary networks. Statistical analyses of FRN data with such models ignore the censored and ranked nature of the data and could potentially result in misleading statistical inference. To investigate this possibility, we compare Bayesian parameter estimates obtained from a likelihood for complete binary networks with those obtained from likelihoods that are derived from the FRN scheme, and therefore accommodate the ranked and censored nature of the data. We show analytically and via simulation that the binary likelihood can provide misleading inference, particularly for certain model parameters that relate network ties to characteristics of individuals and pairs of individuals. We also compare these different likelihoods in a data analysis of several adolescent social networks. For some of these networks, the parameter estimates from the binary and FRN likelihoods lead to different conclusions, indicating the importance of analyzing FRN data with a method that accounts for the FRN survey design.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Airoldi, E. M., Blei, D. M., Fienberg, S. E., & Xing, E. P. (2008). Mixed membership stochastic blockmodels. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9, 19812014.
Breiger, R. L., Boorman, S. A., & Arabie, P. (1975). An algorithm for clustering relational data with applications to social network analysis and comparison with multidimensional scaling. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 12 (3), 328383.
Currarini, S., Jackson, M. O., & Pin, P. (2010). Identifying the roles of race-based choice and chance in high school friendship network formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107 (11), 48574861.
Fletcher, J. M., & Ross, S. L. (2012). Estimating the effects of friendship networks on health behaviors of adolescents. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
Frank, O., & Strauss, D. (1986). Markov graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81 (395), 832842. ISSN .
Geweke, J. (1991). Efficient simulation from the multivariate normal and student-t distributions subject to linear constraints and the evaluation of constraint probabilities. In Computing Science and Statistics: Proceedings of the 23rd symposium on the interface, pp. 571–578.
Gill, P. S., & Swartz, T. B. (2001). Statistical analyses for round robin interaction data. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 29 (2), 321331. ISSN .
Goodreau, S. M., Kitts, J. A., & Morris, M. (2009). Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks.* Demography, 46 (1), 103125.
Handcock, M. S., & Gile, K. J. (2010). Modeling social networks from sampled data. Annals of Applied Statistics, 4 (1), 525. ISSN . 10.1214/08-AOAS221 Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/08-AOAS221.
Harris, K. M., Halpern, C. T., Whitsel, E., Hussey, J., Tabor, J., Entzel, P., & Udry, J. R. (2009). The national longitudinal study of adolescent health: Research design. Retrieved from http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design (December 15, 2012).
Hoff, P. D. (2005). Bilinear mixed-effects models for dyadic data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100 (469), 286295. ISSN .
Hoff, P. D. (2007). Extending the rank likelihood for semiparametric copula estimation. Annals of Applied Statistics, 1 (1), 265283. ISSN .
Hoff, P. D. (2009a). Multiplicative latent factor models for description and prediction of social networks. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 15 (4), 261272.
Hoff, P. D. (2009b). A first course in bayesian statistical methods. Springer Texts in Statistics. New York, NY: Springer. ix, 270 p. EUR 64.15; SFR 99.50.
Hoff, P. D., Raftery, A. E., & Handcock, M. S. (2002). Latent space approaches to social network analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97 (460), 10901098. ISSN .
Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1981). An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76 (373), 3350.
Kiuru, N., Burk, W. J., Laursen, B., Salmela-Aro, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2010). Pressure to drink but not to smoke: Disentangling selection and socialization in adolescent peer networks and peer groups. Journal of Adolescence, 33 (6), 801812.
Krivitsky, P. N., & Butts, C. T. (2012). Exponential-family random graph models for rank-order relational data. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.0493 (December 15, 2012).
Li, H., & Loken, E. (2002). A unified theory of statistical analysis and inference for variance component models for dyadic data. Statistics Sinica, 12 (2), 519535. ISSN .
Macdonald-Wallis, K., Jago, R., Page, A. S., Brockman, R., & Thompson, J. L. (2011). School-based friendship networks and children's physical activity: A spatial analytical approach. Social Science & Medicine, 73 (1), 612.
Moody, J., Brynildsen, W. D., Osgood, D. W., Feinberg, M. E., & Gest, S. (2011). Popularity trajectories and substance use in early adolescence. Social Networks, 33 (2), 101112.
Moreno, J. L. (1953). Who shall survive? Foundations of sociometry, group psychotherapy and socio-drama. Mustang, OK: Beacon House.
Moreno, J. L. (1960). The sociometry reader. New York, NY: Free Press.
Nowicki, K., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2001). Estimation and prediction for stochastic blockstructures. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96 (455), 10771087. ISSN .
Pettitt, A. N. (1982). Inference for the linear model using a likelihood based on ranks. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 44 (2), 234243. ISSN .
Rodriguez-Yam, G., Davis, R. A., & Scharf, L. L. (2004). Efficient Gibbs sampling of truncated multivariate normal with application to constrained linear regression. Unpublished manuscript.
Sampson, S. F. (1969). Crisis in a cloister. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Severini, T. A. (1991). On the relationship between Bayesian and non-Bayesian interval estimates. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 53 (3), 611618. ISSN .
Sherman, L. (2002). Sociometry in the classroom: How to do it. Retrieved from http://www.users.muohio.edu/shermalw/sociometryfiles/socio_introduction.htmlx (December 15, 2012).
Snijders, T. A. B., Pattison, P. E., Robins, G. L., & Handcock, M. S. (2006). New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociological Methodology, 36 (1), 99153.
Thomas, S. L. (2000). Ties that bind: A social network approach to understanding student integration and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 71, 591615.
van Duijn, Marijtje A. J., Snijders, Tom A. B., & Zijlstra, Bonne J. H. (2004). p 2: A random effects model with covariates for directed graphs. Statistica Neerlandica, 58 (2), 234254. ISSN .
Warner, R., Kenny, D. A., & Stoto, M. (1979). A new round robin analysis of variance for social interaction data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 17421757.
Wasserman, S., & Pattison, P. (1996). Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. an introduction to markov graphs andp. Psychometrika, 61 (3), 401425.
Weerman, F. M. (2011). Delinquent peers in context: A longitudinal network analysis of selection and influence effects. Criminology, 49 (1), 253286.
Weerman, F. M., & Smeenk, W. H. (2005). Peer similarity in delinquency for different types of friends: A comparison using two measurement methods. Criminology, 43 (2), 499524.
Wong, G. Y. (1982). Round robin analysis of variance via maximum likelihood. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77 (380), 714724. ISSN .

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Likelihoods for fixed rank nomination networks

  • PETER HOFF (a1), BAILEY FOSDICK (a2), ALEX VOLFOVSKY (a3) and KATHERINE STOVEL (a4)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.